Moderator: Community Team
benga wrote:Game 12203169 this loser is better then you all!!!
qwert wrote:benga wrote:Game 12203169 this loser is better then you all!!!
nope these its much better- Game 12097228
these its like farming,playing only on your map, i bet that you refuse to play in any other map if someone want to play on hes favorite map, when you win a game.
qwert wrote:well you restricted your self, you never going to enjoy in CC. Its have to much interesting thing here in CC like Tournaments and Clans Competitions, unfortunately when someone decide that points its all what it hes goal,then all excitement and enjoy not exist anymore. Over 200 maps are here for fun, and you need to try to play in all maps , to achive some more goals,instead to play one map every day,over and over again....boring.
stoicbird wrote:qwert wrote:benga wrote:Game 12203169 this loser is better then you all!!!
nope these its much better- Game 12097228
these its like farming,playing only on your map, i bet that you refuse to play in any other map if someone want to play on hes favorite map, when you win a game.
The Istanbul map is the best normal map to play 1v1 that's why I play it. You start with 3 troops to deploy, you can't get a small bonus from the drop and there is no special strategy to it unlike feudal or the aor's maaps. Every game is different and you have to read the map. I have no advantage on that map yet I have 69 win %
Its a true strategists map.
However, there will always be games where the dice decide. I recently lost 61points to a cadet that missed 4 turns in a 12 round esc game. I've also been beat by 2 cooks. Shit happens but I know I'll bounce back.
stoicbird wrote:qwert wrote:well you restricted your self, you never going to enjoy in CC. Its have to much interesting thing here in CC like Tournaments and Clans Competitions, unfortunately when someone decide that points its all what it hes goal,then all excitement and enjoy not exist anymore. Over 200 maps are here for fun, and you need to try to play in all maps , to achive some more goals,instead to play one map every day,over and over again....boring.
I tried doubles but felt my partner was not in sync with me. I tried a couple of multi player esc games and won both of them, they just took too long. I've played numerous maps but this game I've found is my whole cc experience now and I am happy with it. Points aren't important, my highest is 2381 and I doubt I'll ever beat that due to the game I play.
And I never beat either former conquerer on Istanbul. I beat them on france and ww11 eastern front (or something like that)
laughingcavalier wrote:stoicbird wrote:qwert wrote:well you restricted your self, you never going to enjoy in CC. Its have to much interesting thing here in CC like Tournaments and Clans Competitions, unfortunately when someone decide that points its all what it hes goal,then all excitement and enjoy not exist anymore. Over 200 maps are here for fun, and you need to try to play in all maps , to achive some more goals,instead to play one map every day,over and over again....boring.
I tried doubles but felt my partner was not in sync with me. I tried a couple of multi player esc games and won both of them, they just took too long. I've played numerous maps but this game I've found is my whole cc experience now and I am happy with it. Points aren't important, my highest is 2381 and I doubt I'll ever beat that due to the game I play.
And I never beat either former conquerer on Istanbul. I beat them on france and ww11 eastern front (or something like that)
Yeah stoic you tell the doubters, I am with you. I spent months playing Benelux 1on1s for same sort of reasons you play Istanbul. You'll find some other stuff you enjoy sometime and meantime well done. My record against conquerors is cr*p. I've played 4 or 5 while they've been reigning and lost every game. Not much better after they have slid down the table either.
qwert wrote:well i dont see nothing special , because i defeat 3 former conqueror. These guys are not immortals, and you only play once against these two.
Gillipig wrote:Don't try to tell the man which map and settings he's allowed to play. As long as he plays public games, and that these doesn't attract tons of ?'s, and he doesn't foe all the good players on that map, it's madness to say what he does is immoral or even worse, cheating. Not all immoral ways to play are cheating, and this is not even an immoral way to play! He likes one map, fine, he likes to see how many points he can get, fine, he doesn't play a ton of newbies or very low ranked players, fine, he doesn't hunt down users trying to persuade them to join his games, fine, he doesn't foe all the good players, fine. It's not forbidden to be successful playing only one map you know. If GLG tried to gain points the way stoicbird has, what he did would be alright! But he did foe the good players, he did persuade low ranked players to join his games, and he played a lot of these low ranked players. A glance at stoicbird's list of games played reveals that he plays majors, captains, lieutenants, sergeants, corporals, privates, cadets, cooks. A bit more cooks than average joins his games but the same can be said for majors. Actually way more majors than cooks join his games. He's not selecting his opponents and his opponents are on average not that overly low ranked.
He's won 68% of the games played with these settings on that map, if he's farming what then is my 73% on Das Schloss?
Funkyterrance wrote:Gillipig wrote:Don't try to tell the man which map and settings he's allowed to play. As long as he plays public games, and that these doesn't attract tons of ?'s, and he doesn't foe all the good players on that map, it's madness to say what he does is immoral or even worse, cheating. Not all immoral ways to play are cheating, and this is not even an immoral way to play! He likes one map, fine, he likes to see how many points he can get, fine, he doesn't play a ton of newbies or very low ranked players, fine, he doesn't hunt down users trying to persuade them to join his games, fine, he doesn't foe all the good players, fine. It's not forbidden to be successful playing only one map you know. If GLG tried to gain points the way stoicbird has, what he did would be alright! But he did foe the good players, he did persuade low ranked players to join his games, and he played a lot of these low ranked players. A glance at stoicbird's list of games played reveals that he plays majors, captains, lieutenants, sergeants, corporals, privates, cadets, cooks. A bit more cooks than average joins his games but the same can be said for majors. Actually way more majors than cooks join his games. He's not selecting his opponents and his opponents are on average not that overly low ranked.
He's won 68% of the games played with these settings on that map, if he's farming what then is my 73% on Das Schloss?
Eh?
My point was just that conquerors are not really that superior strat-wise than your average "good" player.
stoicbird wrote:qwert wrote:well i dont see nothing special , because i defeat 3 former conqueror. These guys are not immortals, and you only play once against these two.
That's better mate. So you've beat 5 but how many losses do you have and what's your win %? That's what this thread was about I thought, not which map I prefer to play but I'm easy.
Gillipig wrote:Are you the only one who has posted something in this thread funky? If I didn't quote you, you don't have to automatically assume I'm referring to you. I know you don't actually read most of the posts in a thread you post in, but if you went back and checked, you'd see that I was most likely not talking to you. Now I'm talking to you, see the difference?
josko.ri wrote:Interesting topic, I was curious so I made a research for myself.
Total 59-31 (66%)
JOHNNYROCKET24 12-5
comic boy 1-1
sjnap 3-4
King_Herpes 1-0
karelpietertje 4-3
rabbiton 2-0
Blitzaholic 1-3
Emmdizzle 1-0
thebest712 2-5
ljex 13-5
mc05025 1-0
ccatman 7-3
100mates 2-0
Kaskavel 9-2
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: SneakySheep