Conquer Club

intentional deadbeating[CLEARED]es

All previously decided cases. Please check here before opening a new case.

Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]

intentional deadbeating[CLEARED]es

Postby PROFESSOR BRAINY on Thu Mar 21, 2013 7:36 pm

i'm in a feudal epic game 12200671
player

Titan Wood

is intentionally deadbeating.

I KNOW he is, because his "last visited" stat shows him logging-on..just not entering this particular game
he is doing it so I wont get cards.
he has done this to me in the past


PLACE THE NAME OF THE ACCUSED IN THE SUBJECT LINE!!!

Replace or delete any xxxxxxx with the appropriate information.
Delete any accusations or entries which do not apply.

You can upload image attachments to your post by using the 'Upload Attachment' feature below [Preview] and [Submit] buttons.

Be sure before you accuse someone!
</DELETE ME>

Accused:

xxxxxxx
xxxxxxx
xxxxxxx



The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis
Conducting Secret Diplomacy
Severe PM Abuse
Other: <Explanation>



Game number(s):

[game]xxxxxxx[/game]
[game]xxxxxxx[/game]
[game]xxxxxxx[/game]
[game]xxxxxxx[/game]


Comments:
User avatar
Sergeant PROFESSOR BRAINY
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2010 4:55 pm

Re: intentional deadbeating Titan Wood

Postby PROFESSOR BRAINY on Thu Mar 21, 2013 7:40 pm

i'm not sure I filled the form out right
Titan Wood
is intentionally deadbeating in game 12200671

his "last visited" stat shows that he DOES log-on but doesn't take turns in game 12200671

he has done this same thing to me in the past to make-sure I lose

he is intentionally deadbeating to keep me from getting his cards...he already missed two turns-in-a-row

if and when he misses his third..i don't get the cards...isn't that cheating?...the rules say it is
User avatar
Sergeant PROFESSOR BRAINY
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2010 4:55 pm

Re: intentional deadbeating

Postby Evil Semp on Thu Mar 21, 2013 8:00 pm

At this time he hasn't deadbeated so he hasn't broken a rule. He has missed 8 turns in this game. If or when he deadbeats you might have a complaint. There is no rule stating the he must take a card. If he has done this to you before I suggest you put him on FOE so he can't join any games that you are in.
Image
User avatar
Lieutenant Evil Semp
Multi Hunter
Multi Hunter
 
Posts: 8352
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 8:50 pm

Re: intentional deadbeating

Postby Gumby1 on Thu Mar 21, 2013 8:00 pm

In future you should leave a link to the game in question:

http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=12200671

I had to scroll through several pages of your game to find it.

It appears that he is deadbeating because he has lost. Most (if not all) deadbeating is intentional, that is why there is a option to tag this in the rating system. I can't see how it is cheating, however. He has 2 cards, just eliminate him and take his cards. Unless I am missing something.
User avatar
Lieutenant Gumby1
 
Posts: 36
Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 10:52 pm
Location: Toronto

Re: intentional deadbeating[pending]es

Postby hotfire on Thu Mar 21, 2013 10:19 pm

isnt there also a rule about holding a freemium hostage?
User avatar
Colonel hotfire
 
Posts: 528
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2007 7:50 pm

Re: intentional deadbeating[pending]es

Postby nicestash on Thu Mar 21, 2013 10:29 pm

hotfire wrote:isnt there also a rule about holding a freemium hostage?

There's a rule against holding anyone hostage actually.
Major nicestash
 
Posts: 472
Joined: Fri May 07, 2010 8:50 pm

Re: intentional deadbeating[pending]es

Postby hotfire on Thu Mar 21, 2013 10:52 pm

nicestash wrote:
hotfire wrote:isnt there also a rule about holding a freemium hostage?

There's a rule against holding anyone hostage actually.

and the OP is clearly doing this, correct?
User avatar
Colonel hotfire
 
Posts: 528
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2007 7:50 pm

Re: intentional deadbeating[pending]es

Postby rishaed on Thu Mar 21, 2013 11:36 pm

hotfire wrote:
nicestash wrote:
hotfire wrote:isnt there also a rule about holding a freemium hostage?

There's a rule against holding anyone hostage actually.

and the OP is clearly doing this, correct?

Yup. . . Thats not exactly kosher! No wonder the guy isn't "Taking" his turns. He doesn't have a single chance to win and should be eliminated already. . .
aage wrote: Maybe you're right, but since we receive no handlebars from the mod I think we should get some ourselves.

Image
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class rishaed
 
Posts: 1052
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2007 8:54 pm
Location: Somewhere in the Foundry forums looking for whats going on!

Re: intentional deadbeating[pending]es

Postby rishaed on Thu Mar 21, 2013 11:40 pm

After looking at the log, Red "person posting in the OP" has had the opportunity to eliminate him for the past 2 turns? Both of which blue has missed. . . I don't exactly see why red isn't taking his cards and using them.
aage wrote: Maybe you're right, but since we receive no handlebars from the mod I think we should get some ourselves.

Image
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class rishaed
 
Posts: 1052
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2007 8:54 pm
Location: Somewhere in the Foundry forums looking for whats going on!

Re: intentional deadbeating[pending]es

Postby Gumby1 on Fri Mar 22, 2013 7:37 am

hotfire wrote:isnt there also a rule about holding a freemium hostage?


I'm not sure if he is technically holding blue hostage because he has left blue 1 spot to attack. He certainly has him boxed in however, so I guess a case could be made for it. That being said, red has now lost those 2 cards by not finishing off blue because it is blue's turn, and if he doesn't take this turn, he will be kicked out for 3 missed in a row. Still not sure why red just didn't take him out instead of complaining about it.

As for intentionally deadbeating so that red can't get his cards, that is just not the case. Red could have eliminated blue and taken his 2 cards. Blue just didn't play because his game was over. Rate him poorly, foe him is you have to, and move on.
User avatar
Lieutenant Gumby1
 
Posts: 36
Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 10:52 pm
Location: Toronto

Re: intentional deadbeating[pending]es

Postby Koganosi on Fri Mar 22, 2013 10:03 am

gumby7524 wrote:
hotfire wrote:isnt there also a rule about holding a freemium hostage?


I'm not sure if he is technically holding blue hostage because he has left blue 1 spot to attack. He certainly has him boxed in however, so I guess a case could be made for it. That being said, red has now lost those 2 cards by not finishing off blue because it is blue's turn, and if he doesn't take this turn, he will be kicked out for 3 missed in a row. Still not sure why red just didn't take him out instead of complaining about it.

As for intentionally deadbeating so that red can't get his cards, that is just not the case. Red could have eliminated blue and taken his 2 cards. Blue just didn't play because his game was over. Rate him poorly, foe him is you have to, and move on.


Dont agree on the holding hostage part untill now, I have to check back later in hte logs. But let me remind you guys its trench! Looking further back it seems like helding hostage, though blue has more then 327 troops, biggest fort the guy has done in turn 89. 2013-03-19 14:33:58 - Titan Wood reinforced Feudal Empire 7 with 324 troops from Feudal Empire 5!! So thats still a big effort to put into with troops, seeing there is also other people knocking on your front wall. In the end blue just suicided into him then red started killing him. And deadbeating meanwhile. This so that if he woudl have gone through with it his troops would go neutral and his cards lost, so red could not get them. In 10 hours well see if blue goes through and deadbeats all the way.

Urs

Koganosi
Image
User avatar
Major Koganosi
 
Posts: 1597
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 1:06 pm
Location: Netherlands

Re: intentional deadbeating[pending]es

Postby Titan Wood on Fri Mar 22, 2013 7:04 pm

PROFESSOR BRAINY
Is a real unfriendly player I have nothing nice to say about his actions. He could have killed blue in this map a long time ago.
Cook Titan Wood
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon May 10, 2010 12:38 pm

Re: intentional deadbeating[pending]es

Postby Titan Wood on Sat Mar 23, 2013 3:14 pm

by choosing to drag me through the coals your an *******
The game is lost and its a shame that you dont see it.
Cook Titan Wood
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon May 10, 2010 12:38 pm

Re: intentional deadbeating[pending] Professor Brainy

Postby Woftam on Sun Mar 24, 2013 1:28 pm

Professor Brainy is an overbearing know it all who's tactic is to acuse his oponents of everything from deadbeating to multi's ...the nagging, whineing, abuse continues throughout the game till his opponents either quit or intentionally lose to escape the madness...i have blocked him out and do not wish to ever play this player again for any reason, I strongly suggest that you all do the same or suffer the same as all of his oponents have in the past. DO NOT PLAY THIS GUY , ...frustrating would be the nicest thing i could say about him and his tactics...i am sure this is not what this site is about .
Sergeant Woftam
 
Posts: 13
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 1:37 am

Re: intentional deadbeating[pending]es

Postby Woftam on Sun Mar 24, 2013 1:29 pm

Titan Wood wrote:PROFESSOR BRAINY
Is a real unfriendly player I have nothing nice to say about his actions. He could have killed blue in this map a long time ago.

I understand what you have gone through...this is his tactic, to offend and abuse...he should be kicked out.
Sergeant Woftam
 
Posts: 13
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 1:37 am

Re: intentional deadbeating[pending]es

Postby Evil Semp on Sun Mar 24, 2013 4:44 pm

Titan Wood did not deadbeat so he is CLEARED.
Image
User avatar
Lieutenant Evil Semp
Multi Hunter
Multi Hunter
 
Posts: 8352
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 8:50 pm


Return to Closed C&A Reports

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users