Moderator: Clan Directors
patrickaa317 wrote:There's actually 250 spots per clan.
25*1= 25
25*2= 50
25*3= 75
25*4=100
Chewie1 wrote:DBC will hold their own against any clan with this.
Vid_FISO wrote:Chewie1 wrote:DBC will hold their own against any clan with this.
You reckon? If (when) they all knock you back then give us a shout, we need to get more maps and varied settings into our lower ranks
denominator wrote:Vid_FISO wrote:Chewie1 wrote:DBC will hold their own against any clan with this.
You reckon? If (when) they all knock you back then give us a shout, we need to get more maps and varied settings into our lower ranks
Then put your money where your mouth is. Don't talk shit and then sit back and watch.
Chewie1 wrote:Over 90 views no takers.
C'mon top clans, too difficult a challenge for you?
jsnyder748 wrote:its funny how all you guys care so much about this elitest crap....its online risk people
plus what silver said there is already a random league most clans are in....i think
jsnyder748 wrote:its funny how all you guys care so much about this elitest crap....its online risk people
plus what silver said there is already a random league most clans are in....i think
silversun6 wrote:where were you when the random league started if you are so into random ?
Osa has 4 wars now (not counting RL3 & CL5) and 2 coming up , no way to add one more now..
crispybits wrote:Yeah but we all know the top clans are far too <<insert word here to your liking>> AWESOME to accept a challenge like this
Bring it DBC - we're the only ones so far to show any willingness to take you on!
silversun6 wrote:where were you when the random league started if you are so into random ?
Osa has 4 wars now (not counting RL3 & CL5) and 2 coming up , no way to add one more now..
chapcrap wrote:crispybits wrote:Yeah but we all know the top clans are far too <<insert word here to your liking>> AWESOME to accept a challenge like this
Bring it DBC - we're the only ones so far to show any willingness to take you on!
Done.silversun6 wrote:where were you when the random league started if you are so into random ?
Osa has 4 wars now (not counting RL3 & CL5) and 2 coming up , no way to add one more now..
This is true. We have CL5, RL3, Empire, VVV, TSM, and CC4, plus negotiations with another clan. Our guys don't want anything else right now.
Chewie1 wrote:jsnyder748 wrote:its funny how all you guys care so much about this elitest crap....its online risk people
plus what silver said there is already a random league most clans are in....i think
Want to go to war then?
swimmerdude99 wrote:Suppose someone were to offer you a challenge if the 1v1s were taken away and each player were only allowed to play X number of times so that everyone got to play almost equal amount of games?
Chewie1 wrote:swimmerdude99 wrote:Suppose someone were to offer you a challenge if the 1v1s were taken away and each player were only allowed to play X number of times so that everyone got to play almost equal amount of games?
Wouldnt be truly random then would it.
Why drop the 1v1 s?
IcePack wrote:Chewie1 wrote:swimmerdude99 wrote:Suppose someone were to offer you a challenge if the 1v1s were taken away and each player were only allowed to play X number of times so that everyone got to play almost equal amount of games?
Wouldnt be truly random then would it.
Why drop the 1v1 s?
Well if you truly want truly random perhaps you should make a list of clans and randomly select your opponent. By excluding so many clans and only targeting a top elitist clan you are removing an element of random as well.
Chewie1 wrote:swimmerdude99 wrote:Suppose someone were to offer you a challenge if the 1v1s were taken away and each player were only allowed to play X number of times so that everyone got to play almost equal amount of games?
Wouldnt be truly random then would it.
Why drop the 1v1 s?
swimmerdude99 wrote:Chewie1 wrote:swimmerdude99 wrote:Suppose someone were to offer you a challenge if the 1v1s were taken away and each player were only allowed to play X number of times so that everyone got to play almost equal amount of games?
Wouldnt be truly random then would it.
Why drop the 1v1 s?
Because 1v1s would make it too random. You might as well just draw straws to determine who wins in a 1v1. Then again maybe you should do that for the whole challenge if you don't mind 25 of the games being based on dice
denominator wrote:swimmerdude99 wrote:Chewie1 wrote:swimmerdude99 wrote:Suppose someone were to offer you a challenge if the 1v1s were taken away and each player were only allowed to play X number of times so that everyone got to play almost equal amount of games?
Wouldnt be truly random then would it.
Why drop the 1v1 s?
Because 1v1s would make it too random. You might as well just draw straws to determine who wins in a 1v1. Then again maybe you should do that for the whole challenge if you don't mind 25 of the games being based on dice
So you actually believe that there is no skill in winning a 1v1 game?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users