PLAYER57832 wrote:Becuase those "plans" were abusive, not real insurance. They were mildly better than no insurance, but not real coverage.
No, those were called choices. Who are you to demand that people have the kind of insurance plans that YOU deem appropriate? Some people would rather have insurance for its true purpose: catastrophic care, than have to pay massive premiums for a policy that covers everything down to a splinter. What gives you the right to dictate what policy people choose? You get pissed off that people want to protect the unborn child in a womb, yet you're perfectly okay with dictating the policies covering every other body part on other people. Could you actually be consistent in anything besides "government must get bigger and more powerful"?
PLAYER57832 wrote:Ah here we go... the old rant against any government regulation...
Try sticking to the topic.
Considering there have already been thousands of regulations written (and never passed by Congress) under this law alone, with thousands more coming in the future, I'd say it's very much on topic.