Conquer Club

Tories feel insecure about their penis size

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Postby Telvannia on Wed Oct 10, 2007 1:25 pm

id rather vote for david 'blairwannabe' cameron than, gordon 'the pussy' brown, and alistair 'the copycat' darling
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Telvannia
 
Posts: 1331
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 7:19 am

Postby Norse on Wed Oct 10, 2007 1:29 pm

heavycola wrote:

Anyway tories are hung like racehorses. That's where the swagger comes from. I'll be voting for 'em.


Welcome to my evil lair...
b.k. barunt wrote:Snorri's like one of those fufu dogs who get all excited and dance around pissing on themself.

suggs wrote:scared off by all the pervs and wankers already? No? Then let me introduce myself, I'm Mr Pervy Wank.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Norse
 
Posts: 4227
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 4:14 pm
Location: Cradled in the arms of Freya.

Postby Titanic on Wed Oct 10, 2007 3:38 pm

Telvannia wrote:id rather vote for david 'blairwannabe' cameron than, gordon 'the pussy' brown, and alistair 'the copycat' darling


Gordon Browns a pussy? How exactly? And what exactly did Alistair Darling copycat? On inheritance tax? You know Labour have thought abut raising the limit numerous times since they came into power, and Gordon brown last year actually said that from 2008 onwards the limit would be raise. All Darling did was raise it sooner and higher.

Also, record investment in health and education, thats hardly copycat. In the 18 years the Tories weer in power they bled the health and education sectors almost dry, just so they could please the conservative pussies with "tax cuts".
User avatar
Major Titanic
 
Posts: 1558
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 12:58 pm
Location: Northampton, UK

Postby AlgyTaylor on Thu Oct 11, 2007 2:30 pm

Too fecking right.

Personally I'm very much against this and Labour's support of it:
Image
and have been from the start.

BUT it's important not to forget all the brilliant things they have done that a Tory government would've never even considered: devolution, minimum wage, far better workers rights, record spending in the public sector, written off load of 3rd world debt, letting Pinochet know exactly what he was - a criminal who's not welcome here, ...

When Gordon Brown decides to have an election (which is NOT David Cameron's choice despite DCs attempts to make it so), my vote will 100% be behind what in my opinion is the best government we've had in a very long time.
Corporal AlgyTaylor
 
Posts: 433
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 3:35 pm
Location: Liverpool, UK

Postby Norse on Thu Oct 11, 2007 2:38 pm

Sure, Im guessing that most of you rats have forgotten the "right to buy" policy introduced by the tories.

The single most populatio- wealth enhancing measure ever taken, and because of this, it turned most working classes into middle classes.

Would this have ever happened in a labour government? Doubt it, since they would prefer everyone to rot away in communes.

BTW, there certainly is not better working rights now, in fact labour have shrugged off the unions even more than the tories did. Plus who gives a f*ck about pinochet? Plus I see no benefit to myself writing off the 3rd world debt, especially when considering the British were the only ones to have accrued any debt for the 2nd world war, and despite us "saving the world" we still had to pay the yanks back.
b.k. barunt wrote:Snorri's like one of those fufu dogs who get all excited and dance around pissing on themself.

suggs wrote:scared off by all the pervs and wankers already? No? Then let me introduce myself, I'm Mr Pervy Wank.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Norse
 
Posts: 4227
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 4:14 pm
Location: Cradled in the arms of Freya.

Postby Norse on Thu Oct 11, 2007 2:41 pm

In fact, an independent survey has revealed recently, that in britain, we are now workking longer hours, and being paid less...when taking into account inflation, than we were 15 years ago..


Labour has put us back to the bad old days of the 70's, dont let their spin fool you.
b.k. barunt wrote:Snorri's like one of those fufu dogs who get all excited and dance around pissing on themself.

suggs wrote:scared off by all the pervs and wankers already? No? Then let me introduce myself, I'm Mr Pervy Wank.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Norse
 
Posts: 4227
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 4:14 pm
Location: Cradled in the arms of Freya.

Postby AlgyTaylor on Thu Oct 11, 2007 2:55 pm

Norse wrote:Sure, Im guessing that most of you rats have forgotten the "right to buy" policy introduced by the tories.

The single most populatio- wealth enhancing measure ever taken, and because of this, it turned most working classes into middle classes.

One good policy in how many years of power?

Against selling off the national transport, communications and utilities to line their own profits? Allowing natural gas to be burnt off to make electricity, so now we have to buy in gas from overseas? I could go on.

Norse wrote:BTW, there certainly is not better working rights now, in fact labour have shrugged off the unions even more than the tories did.

Sorry, but this is the most laughable comment I've ever heard. In a word, no.

Norse wrote:Plus who gives a f*ck about pinochet?

I'm sure the families of now deceased people care an awful lot

Norse wrote: Plus I see no benefit to myself writing off the 3rd world debt, especially when considering the British were the only ones to have accrued any debt for the 2nd world war, and despite us "saving the world" we still had to pay the yanks back.

Lovely to see Tories haven't lost any of their selfishness despite Cameron's attempts to make them seem in some way a nice group of people to have in power.

I'd rather poke a fork in my eye than vote for that cnut.
Corporal AlgyTaylor
 
Posts: 433
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 3:35 pm
Location: Liverpool, UK

Postby Norse on Thu Oct 11, 2007 3:12 pm

AlgyTaylor wrote:One good policy in how many years of power?


'twas a massively great policy, as well as many others, such as securing a better future for people in poor situations, who could not afford to buy their own home, like yourself i guess.

This policy did not benefit my parents, but I still agree that it was one of the largest wealth bringing poliicies ever.

Against selling off the national transport, communications and utilities to line their own profits? Allowing natural gas to be burnt off to make electricity, so now we have to buy in gas from overseas? I could go on.


Oh yes, the public secter :lol:

Lazy, inefficient, uncompetitive bone idle wastage.

Even Labour MP's Agree with this one...look what theyve done with the postal service...and also they had put the final nail into the coffin of the publich transport..Maybe you should read up about this.


Sorry, but this is the most laughable comment I've ever heard. In a word, no.


Oh is it?

The bleatings of an ignorant man, i see.


I'm sure the families of now deceased people care an awful lot


What has chile got to do with the price of mature cheddar?

Lovely to see Tories haven't lost any of their selfishness despite Cameron's attempts to make them seem in some way a nice group of people to have in power.

I'd rather poke a fork in my eye than vote for that cnut.


I feel your pain, you cantankerous, blissfully ignorant, probably jobless git.

Bring back the 70's! Hurrah!

Seriously though, Im assuming that you are either a bitter 60 year old ex-miner, or a 1st year politics student. Learn some facts about what you spout off in future.
b.k. barunt wrote:Snorri's like one of those fufu dogs who get all excited and dance around pissing on themself.

suggs wrote:scared off by all the pervs and wankers already? No? Then let me introduce myself, I'm Mr Pervy Wank.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Norse
 
Posts: 4227
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 4:14 pm
Location: Cradled in the arms of Freya.

Postby Titanic on Thu Oct 11, 2007 3:55 pm

The single most populatio- wealth enhancing measure ever taken, and because of this, it turned most working classes into middle classes.


Lol, no it wasnt. It only helped those who could actually afford it, ie, lower middle class. The actual lower class who could barely live on council estates could not afford to buy out their house. The minimum wage has done more to help the lower class close the gap towards the middle class. Btw, the tories were totally against the minimum wage when it was first introduced.
BTW, there certainly is not better working rights now, in fact labour have shrugged off the unions even more than the tories did.


Lol no. The tories did, remember the miners strike? They completely took all power away from unions and left them in a dire situation. Labour do not set out to cause the unions disruption because the unions pay a significant amount of Labours running costs.

Plus who gives a f*ck about pinochet?


Those people who care about human rights, and innocent lives, and freedom of expression and views.

Plus I see no benefit to myself writing off the 3rd world debt, especially when considering the British were the only ones to have accrued any debt for the 2nd world war, and despite us "saving the world" we still had to pay the yanks back.


Firstly, we did not "save the world". We alone could never have won WWII, we only just managed to hold of the Luftwaffe on home territory, and that was because of a huge tactical mistake by Hitler and the high command.

Secondly, it was not only Britain which had debts to the USA and Canada after WWII. Other countries, and European countries, also have debts from the lend-lease programme and the Marshall plan (which alone involved 15 countries).

Writing of 3rd world debt is important. It is this debt which prevents African countries (and the other countries in the world) from expanding their economy, feeding their people, fighting corruption, and eventually leads to the civil wars. Obviously other factors do count, but having billions of pounds of debt removed can help clear air make a difference. Also, it is partly out imperialistic ideas which put them in the situation they are in now, so it should be our duty to their citizens to at least make sure they can live their lives.

In fact, an independent survey has revealed recently, that in britain, we are now workking longer hours, and being paid less...when taking into account inflation, than we were 15 years ago..


Working longer hours..possible..I dunno the statistic on this. Show your proof please.

Being paid less, even after taking inflation into account, pure bullsh*t. Public sectors workers up until this year have recieved an above inflation wage increase (generally 1%-3% above). Private sector workers generally get an even better deal, especially because the finance and service sectors have boomed in the past 10 years within the UK, and these are high paying jobs and have huge amounts of employees (around 65%-70% of the UK workforce).

Oh yes, the public secter Laughing

Lazy, inefficient, uncompetitive bone idle wastage.


The public sector when in good hands can do a very good job. Look at the NHS compares to the private health care in USA. Also, transport fares have rocketed since they were privatised, at least with government subsidies travel resonably priced.


What has chile got to do with the price of mature cheddar?


That depends on how narrow minded your vision and motives are.

I trust the Labour government much more then the Tories. The tories abolished the GLC and made London suffer just because Ken Livingstone, a labour candidate, became the leader of the council. They held back international efforts to end the aparthied in SA. They viewed Nelson Mandela as a terrorist. The bought about a recession in the early 90's. They caused the pound to crash in value. They sucked education and healthcare dry and put them in terrible states. They supported people who had human rights abuses against their names. Want me to continue?
User avatar
Major Titanic
 
Posts: 1558
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 12:58 pm
Location: Northampton, UK

Postby Dancing Mustard on Thu Oct 11, 2007 5:38 pm

Titanic wrote:
The single most populatio- wealth enhancing measure ever taken, and because of this, it turned most working classes into middle classes.


Lol, no it wasnt. It only helped those who could actually afford it, ie, lower middle class. The actual lower class who could barely live on council estates could not afford to buy out their house. The minimum wage has done more to help the lower class close the gap towards the middle class. Btw, the tories were totally against the minimum wage when it was first introduced.
BTW, there certainly is not better working rights now, in fact labour have shrugged off the unions even more than the tories did.


Lol no. The tories did, remember the miners strike? They completely took all power away from unions and left them in a dire situation. Labour do not set out to cause the unions disruption because the unions pay a significant amount of Labours running costs.

Plus who gives a f*ck about pinochet?


Those people who care about human rights, and innocent lives, and freedom of expression and views.

Plus I see no benefit to myself writing off the 3rd world debt, especially when considering the British were the only ones to have accrued any debt for the 2nd world war, and despite us "saving the world" we still had to pay the yanks back.


Firstly, we did not "save the world". We alone could never have won WWII, we only just managed to hold of the Luftwaffe on home territory, and that was because of a huge tactical mistake by Hitler and the high command.

Secondly, it was not only Britain which had debts to the USA and Canada after WWII. Other countries, and European countries, also have debts from the lend-lease programme and the Marshall plan (which alone involved 15 countries).

Writing of 3rd world debt is important. It is this debt which prevents African countries (and the other countries in the world) from expanding their economy, feeding their people, fighting corruption, and eventually leads to the civil wars. Obviously other factors do count, but having billions of pounds of debt removed can help clear air make a difference. Also, it is partly out imperialistic ideas which put them in the situation they are in now, so it should be our duty to their citizens to at least make sure they can live their lives.

In fact, an independent survey has revealed recently, that in britain, we are now workking longer hours, and being paid less...when taking into account inflation, than we were 15 years ago..


Working longer hours..possible..I dunno the statistic on this. Show your proof please.

Being paid less, even after taking inflation into account, pure bullsh*t. Public sectors workers up until this year have recieved an above inflation wage increase (generally 1%-3% above). Private sector workers generally get an even better deal, especially because the finance and service sectors have boomed in the past 10 years within the UK, and these are high paying jobs and have huge amounts of employees (around 65%-70% of the UK workforce).

Oh yes, the public secter Laughing

Lazy, inefficient, uncompetitive bone idle wastage.


The public sector when in good hands can do a very good job. Look at the NHS compares to the private health care in USA. Also, transport fares have rocketed since they were privatised, at least with government subsidies travel resonably priced.


What has chile got to do with the price of mature cheddar?


That depends on how narrow minded your vision and motives are.

I trust the Labour government much more then the Tories. The tories abolished the GLC and made London suffer just because Ken Livingstone, a labour candidate, became the leader of the council. They held back international efforts to end the aparthied in SA. They viewed Nelson Mandela as a terrorist. The bought about a recession in the early 90's. They caused the pound to crash in value. They sucked education and healthcare dry and put them in terrible states. They supported people who had human rights abuses against their names. Want me to continue?


Titanic, I think you're cool and all, and I like your style.

But don't you think that post was excessively long? I mean, how long did it honestly take you, and why do you care that much?
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!

Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.
User avatar
Corporal Dancing Mustard
 
Posts: 5442
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 3:31 pm
Location: Pushing Buttons

Postby Titanic on Thu Oct 11, 2007 5:46 pm

Dancing Mustard wrote:
Titanic wrote:
The single most populatio- wealth enhancing measure ever taken, and because of this, it turned most working classes into middle classes.


Lol, no it wasnt. It only helped those who could actually afford it, ie, lower middle class. The actual lower class who could barely live on council estates could not afford to buy out their house. The minimum wage has done more to help the lower class close the gap towards the middle class. Btw, the tories were totally against the minimum wage when it was first introduced.
BTW, there certainly is not better working rights now, in fact labour have shrugged off the unions even more than the tories did.


Lol no. The tories did, remember the miners strike? They completely took all power away from unions and left them in a dire situation. Labour do not set out to cause the unions disruption because the unions pay a significant amount of Labours running costs.

Plus who gives a f*ck about pinochet?


Those people who care about human rights, and innocent lives, and freedom of expression and views.

Plus I see no benefit to myself writing off the 3rd world debt, especially when considering the British were the only ones to have accrued any debt for the 2nd world war, and despite us "saving the world" we still had to pay the yanks back.


Firstly, we did not "save the world". We alone could never have won WWII, we only just managed to hold of the Luftwaffe on home territory, and that was because of a huge tactical mistake by Hitler and the high command.

Secondly, it was not only Britain which had debts to the USA and Canada after WWII. Other countries, and European countries, also have debts from the lend-lease programme and the Marshall plan (which alone involved 15 countries).

Writing of 3rd world debt is important. It is this debt which prevents African countries (and the other countries in the world) from expanding their economy, feeding their people, fighting corruption, and eventually leads to the civil wars. Obviously other factors do count, but having billions of pounds of debt removed can help clear air make a difference. Also, it is partly out imperialistic ideas which put them in the situation they are in now, so it should be our duty to their citizens to at least make sure they can live their lives.

In fact, an independent survey has revealed recently, that in britain, we are now workking longer hours, and being paid less...when taking into account inflation, than we were 15 years ago..


Working longer hours..possible..I dunno the statistic on this. Show your proof please.

Being paid less, even after taking inflation into account, pure bullsh*t. Public sectors workers up until this year have recieved an above inflation wage increase (generally 1%-3% above). Private sector workers generally get an even better deal, especially because the finance and service sectors have boomed in the past 10 years within the UK, and these are high paying jobs and have huge amounts of employees (around 65%-70% of the UK workforce).

Oh yes, the public secter Laughing

Lazy, inefficient, uncompetitive bone idle wastage.


The public sector when in good hands can do a very good job. Look at the NHS compares to the private health care in USA. Also, transport fares have rocketed since they were privatised, at least with government subsidies travel resonably priced.


What has chile got to do with the price of mature cheddar?


That depends on how narrow minded your vision and motives are.

I trust the Labour government much more then the Tories. The tories abolished the GLC and made London suffer just because Ken Livingstone, a labour candidate, became the leader of the council. They held back international efforts to end the aparthied in SA. They viewed Nelson Mandela as a terrorist. The bought about a recession in the early 90's. They caused the pound to crash in value. They sucked education and healthcare dry and put them in terrible states. They supported people who had human rights abuses against their names. Want me to continue?


Titanic, I think you're cool and all, and I like your style.

But don't you think that post was excessively long? I mean, how long did it honestly take you, and why do you care that much?


Thats a long post? :shock:

It only took me about 5 mins, and most of that was quoting Norse. Actually answering his points was easy.

I do it because I actually do politics as a degree and am in the debating society, so this kind of just gives me practice and is what I do.
User avatar
Major Titanic
 
Posts: 1558
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 12:58 pm
Location: Northampton, UK

Postby duday53 on Thu Oct 11, 2007 5:52 pm

diddle wrote:
Norse wrote:
Anarkistsdream wrote:WTF is a torie?


Conservative...


a party in britian







and that is the extent of my political knowledge :lol:
There is a Progressive Conservative party in Canad too.
lalaland wrote:This is what I love about Spamalot... you click on a title to a thread, and you have no idea what you'll find inside...
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class duday53
 
Posts: 3046
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2007 6:57 pm
Location: 1 hour north of Toronto, Ontario.

Postby joecoolfrog on Thu Oct 11, 2007 11:37 pm

Titanic

Im sorry mate but you are wrong about the right to buy policy, Norse is quite correct when he says that it enabled millions of working class people to aspire to a better lifestyle. I was brought up in a huge council estate which was transformed within a few short years by home ownership, it eventually enabled my parents to retire to a small house in the country rather than rot in urban squallor.
You are also mistaken about the economics of buying a council house at the time, my father told me that his mortgage was only very slightly higher than his rent at the time he bought and within 4 years he was paying less per month than the council tenants !
As I actually lived right through the Thatcher years ( And God help me the Callaghan years that predeeded them ) it is amusing to see her government castigated by todays Brown supporters. You dont seem to realise that the present Labour government has supported policies that would have been thought very right wing 25 years ago, so much has British politics swung towards the centre . Thatcher broke the mould and the old style Torys and Socialists are a relic of the past, there is actually very little difference now between the 2 main parties though the Liberal party of course remains refreshingly Lunatic .
Colonel joecoolfrog
 
Posts: 661
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2006 9:29 pm
Location: London ponds

Postby AlgyTaylor on Fri Oct 12, 2007 5:12 am

Norse wrote:
Against selling off the national transport, communications and utilities to line their own profits? Allowing natural gas to be burnt off to make electricity, so now we have to buy in gas from overseas? I could go on.


Oh yes, the public secter :lol:

Lazy, inefficient, uncompetitive bone idle wastage.

I think it's probably got more to do with them having some civic responsibility - something that the private sector (learn how to spell) shed long ago.

If you provide a civic service (eg sending letters to Orkney for the same price as sending them down the road) you can't hope to compete with the private sector. Doesn't mean that it isn't valuable though, does it?


tory twat \";)\" wrote:What has chile got to do with the price of mature cheddar?

Nothing. But it's got a lot to do with human rights.

tory twat \";)\" wrote:I feel your pain, you cantankerous, blissfully ignorant, probably jobless git.

Bring back the 70's! Hurrah!

Seriously though, Im assuming that you are either a bitter 60 year old ex-miner, or a 1st year politics student. Learn some facts about what you spout off in future.

Wrong on all counts, I'm afraid. Kompute programmer and in my 20s, never studied politics in my life because I wanted to learn some skills that were actually useful to me. Not that there's anything wrong with studying for the sake of, of course - it's just not what I wanted.

The Tories caused untold damage to this country, some of which has been already outlined and there's lots more that hasn't. I don't for one minute think that Maggie Thatcher was the devil incarnate and that everything she touched turned into shite. But a lot of it did.
Corporal AlgyTaylor
 
Posts: 433
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 3:35 pm
Location: Liverpool, UK

Postby joecoolfrog on Fri Oct 12, 2007 5:32 am

Algy
I disagree with your evaluation of the years of Tory rule but its simply a matter of opinion so will leave it at that. What is not in dispute is that the Labour party was forced into reorganising itself along more or less Tory lines in order to get itself elected, it has also you might note singularly failed to overturn the vast majority of Thatcher inspired initiatives :D
Colonel joecoolfrog
 
Posts: 661
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2006 9:29 pm
Location: London ponds

Postby AlgyTaylor on Fri Oct 12, 2007 5:34 am

Agree totally with you there, for better or worse she's changed British politics probably more than any one other individual.
Corporal AlgyTaylor
 
Posts: 433
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 3:35 pm
Location: Liverpool, UK

Postby Titanic on Fri Oct 12, 2007 9:09 am

joecoolfrog wrote:Algy
I disagree with your evaluation of the years of Tory rule but its simply a matter of opinion so will leave it at that. What is not in dispute is that the Labour party was forced into reorganising itself along more or less Tory lines in order to get itself elected, it has also you might note singularly failed to overturn the vast majority of Thatcher inspired initiatives :D


Labour did not go into the Tory lines, all that happened was that Blair made it less socialist. They went the Third Way, not to the right. They are still more left centre then right.

Also, they did change a lot of Thatchers policies (Major changed quite a few himself), but the more noticeable ones like privatisation would have been very hard to overturn because it was just too expensive to buy out the companies again.
User avatar
Major Titanic
 
Posts: 1558
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 12:58 pm
Location: Northampton, UK

Postby AlgyTaylor on Fri Oct 12, 2007 9:25 am

Aye, some of the things Thatcher destroyed are now near impossible to get back. As mentioned before, nationalising stuff out of wartime
Corporal AlgyTaylor
 
Posts: 433
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 3:35 pm
Location: Liverpool, UK

Postby Norse on Fri Oct 12, 2007 11:36 am

Dancing Mustard wrote:
Titanic, I think you're cool and all, and I like your style.

But don't you think that post was excessively long? I mean, how long did it honestly take you, and why do you care that much?


Are you having a fooking giraffe mate?

Style??...what style? If spouting out misguided, ignorant garbage is style, then Get_tonkaed is a fooking glamour model.
b.k. barunt wrote:Snorri's like one of those fufu dogs who get all excited and dance around pissing on themself.

suggs wrote:scared off by all the pervs and wankers already? No? Then let me introduce myself, I'm Mr Pervy Wank.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Norse
 
Posts: 4227
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 4:14 pm
Location: Cradled in the arms of Freya.

Postby Norse on Fri Oct 12, 2007 11:41 am

Plus, I'd like to have seen tony bliar go half way across the world and defeated the Argie-Bargies on their own doorstep....Blair would have probably given the falklands away.

The single most important british military victory in the past 25 years.

I salute you, Lady thatcher!

And, to answer you bolsheviks RE the miners....we're sitting on 300 years supply of coal...why in the fooking world would we need to mine anymore? Just to keep the miners happy? haha! typical foolish pinkoes...
b.k. barunt wrote:Snorri's like one of those fufu dogs who get all excited and dance around pissing on themself.

suggs wrote:scared off by all the pervs and wankers already? No? Then let me introduce myself, I'm Mr Pervy Wank.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Norse
 
Posts: 4227
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 4:14 pm
Location: Cradled in the arms of Freya.

Postby heavycola on Fri Oct 12, 2007 11:42 am

Norse wrote:Sure, Im guessing that most of you rats have forgotten the "right to buy" policy introduced by the tories.

The single most populatio- wealth enhancing measure ever taken, and because of this, it turned most working classes into middle classes.


Actually that was probably the intorduction of inheritance tax whcih effectively destroyed the landed classes. Right-to-buy was a nice idea, but it has decimated the affordable housing supply and we are in a bit of a pickle now as a result.

PS i am a housing journalist, incidentally, a job that took me to the Rowner estate in Gosport on wednesday. Norse i hope you live the right side of the ferry. What an irredeemable shithole.
Image
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class heavycola
 
Posts: 2925
Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2006 10:22 am
Location: Maailmanvalloittajat

Postby Norse on Fri Oct 12, 2007 11:46 am

heavycola wrote:
Norse wrote:Sure, Im guessing that most of you rats have forgotten the "right to buy" policy introduced by the tories.

The single most populatio- wealth enhancing measure ever taken, and because of this, it turned most working classes into middle classes.


Actually that was probably the intorduction of inheritance tax whcih effectively destroyed the landed classes. Right-to-buy was a nice idea, but it has decimated the affordable housing supply and we are in a bit of a pickle now as a result.

PS i am a housing journalist, incidentally, a job that took me to the Rowner estate in Gosport on wednesday. Norse i hope you live the right side of the ferry. What an irredeemable shithole.


My word HC...im suprised you made it out of Rowner alive....Bandit country around there.

I live in a pleasent little hovel, just on the other side of pompey.
b.k. barunt wrote:Snorri's like one of those fufu dogs who get all excited and dance around pissing on themself.

suggs wrote:scared off by all the pervs and wankers already? No? Then let me introduce myself, I'm Mr Pervy Wank.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Norse
 
Posts: 4227
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 4:14 pm
Location: Cradled in the arms of Freya.

Postby joecoolfrog on Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:18 pm

Titanic wrote:
joecoolfrog wrote:Algy
I disagree with your evaluation of the years of Tory rule but its simply a matter of opinion so will leave it at that. What is not in dispute is that the Labour party was forced into reorganising itself along more or less Tory lines in order to get itself elected, it has also you might note singularly failed to overturn the vast majority of Thatcher inspired initiatives :D


Labour did not go into the Tory lines, all that happened was that Blair made it less socialist. They went the Third Way, not to the right. They are still more left centre then right.

Also, they did change a lot of Thatchers policies (Major changed quite a few himself), but the more noticeable ones like privatisation would have been very hard to overturn because it was just too expensive to buy out the companies again.


Hee Hee the Third way is just spin, they could hardly admit to being the copycat party could they :lol: If you look at much of Labours current policy on immigration,security,trade unions or even health then they would have been considered very right wing not so very long ago.
My view is that there is such a general concensus in politics now that a Brown or Cameron government would not be radicaly different, its a question of personality now as much as anything. What I would like to add is that Brown,by ignoring pretty much everybody, made a huge blunder by intoducing the tax on pension dividends. As a direct consequence tens of thousands of ordinary working people have seen their retirement dreams shattered and the pension industry is now in a right old mess. In order to keep public sector workers happy however he has made no attempt to limit the huge strain that will be put on the economy in future years by the index linked pensions that they enjoy, its a ticking time bomb !
Colonel joecoolfrog
 
Posts: 661
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2006 9:29 pm
Location: London ponds

Postby Norse on Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:35 pm

Joe, you're wasting your breath with tit.

Just check any other conversation that is had with him. He isn't particularly bright, and has been fed on a strict diet of "Viva la presidente!". He is happy to be a mindless, autonomous drone. I mean, ffs, he's just started Uni and he posts on the net in this crappy forum.. when I had just started uni, i was on the piss for the first few months, making love to many ugly women, and traffic cones.

This boy has no life, and no free-will.

His Opinions are null, as far as the norse is concerned.
b.k. barunt wrote:Snorri's like one of those fufu dogs who get all excited and dance around pissing on themself.

suggs wrote:scared off by all the pervs and wankers already? No? Then let me introduce myself, I'm Mr Pervy Wank.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Norse
 
Posts: 4227
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 4:14 pm
Location: Cradled in the arms of Freya.

Postby Stopper on Fri Oct 12, 2007 3:12 pm

joecoolfrog wrote:What I would like to add is that Brown,by ignoring pretty much everybody, made a huge blunder by intoducing the tax on pension dividends. As a direct consequence tens of thousands of ordinary working people have seen their retirement dreams shattered and the pension industry is now in a right old mess.


Sorry, but this issue has been massively overblown. The single biggest factor for the apparent failure of so many company pension schemes is Financial Reporting Standard 17, and definitely not Brown's withdrawal of tax relief on dividends.

FRS 17 was hugely controversial way back when it was introduced by the Accounting Standards Board, and I remember disaster was predicted by my lecturers at the time, back in 2001 or whenever. It was finally enforced in 2005, with the trade unions and the National Association of Pension Fund Managers all wanting it scrapped. It forced companies to account for pensions assets and liabilities when they hadn't done before - and the way these were shown in balance sheets makes them look as if they are often massively in deficit. Who is responsible for managing companies' pension funds? Not the chancellor.

Even though I'm a qualified accountant, I don't pretend to fully understand all the issues around it, but I do know that singling Brown out for withdrawing tax relief on dividends back in 1997 is just a desperate attempt by hostile newspapers to inject even the slightest shade of pink into this True-Blue chancellor.
User avatar
Lieutenant Stopper
 
Posts: 2244
Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 5:14 am
Location: Supposed to be working...

Next

Return to Acceptable Content

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users