Moderator: Community Team
Ishiro wrote:I think he's talking more about a real physical test to determine if certain people consistantly "beat the odds".
PerkinsRooster wrote:Fine, I'd participate.
For a person to be "unlucky", they would have to be what....cursed or something? And cursed by what? What kind of power would create "bad luck" and bestow it on the "unlucky"?
If we do 200,000 rolls and someone looks unlucky, all that means is their chances of having a better next 200,000 rolls is better than others. Nothing more, nothing less.
The wonders of reality...
joeyjordison wrote:PerkinsRooster wrote:Fine, I'd participate.
For a person to be "unlucky", they would have to be what....cursed or something? And cursed by what? What kind of power would create "bad luck" and bestow it on the "unlucky"?
If we do 200,000 rolls and someone looks unlucky, all that means is their chances of having a better next 200,000 rolls is better than others. Nothing more, nothing less.
The wonders of reality...
i just think some large scale data from CC would help illustrate the point a bit more
hulmey wrote:Sumtimes the dice are good and sometimes they are bad....
I have noticed that when throwing with 2 dice against the defenders 1 die you have a 85% chance of losing !!!!!
And thats a fact
hulmey wrote:Sumtimes the dice are good and sometimes they are bad....
I have noticed that when throwing with 2 dice against the defenders 1 die you have a 85% chance of losing !!!!!
And thats a fact
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users