dugcarr1 wrote:it didnt work, I am invincible
LOL
Moderator: Community Team
When you said you didn't deny doing whatever it was that you did. I believe it was around page 2 or 3.dugcarr1 wrote:What a joke,,,,,, answer my questions
and dont ever put words in my mouth.
and get a real job
RobinJ wrote: Seems like a bit of a light punishment but I will respect the decision as it will make no difference to me anyway.
dugcarr1 wrote:under protest i will be GIVING AWAY ALL MY POINTS
I WILL NOT PLAY IN ANY GAMES I CREATE FOR 7 days..
if you want my points come get them , i will not fight back
autoload wrote:mandalorian2298 wrote:You see, Dung, you are not pathetic because you tried to bribe/threaten someone to make up for your strategical weakness. That was just lame.
Was that a typo?
Talapus wrote:I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
AndyDufresne wrote:Thus, Dugcarr1 will be BANNED from the FORUM and PERSONAL MESSAGES for 4 months (I.E. 1/3 year) as the forum was the root of this all.
tahitiwahini wrote:Clearly someone should have read Dug his Miranda rights.
Rarely have I seen a case where the right to remain silent could have been put to better use.
AndrewB wrote:EDIT: Actually I'll bet Premium Membership for a year. It is seems to be an acceptable "present". Either way I win, lol
subjekt wrote:Free Dugcarr1 commies !!!!
proactive measures to enforce fair-play.
Free Dugcarr1 commies !!!!
Frigidus wrote:but now that it's become relatively popular it's suffered the usual downturn in coolness.
XenHu wrote:steve monkey wrote:thank **** it doesn't
![]()
-X
My point being is this...whilst what dugcarr1 did was wrong in intent it is still sporting in a twisted way...all about ADVANCED STRATEGY in a way. Ok I may be stretching things far here but it is possible. Either way I am very much not pleased with the outcome and think it is a mistake.
Frigidus wrote:but now that it's become relatively popular it's suffered the usual downturn in coolness.
qeee1 wrote:communism is not by definition repressive
tahitiwahini wrote:qeee1 wrote:communism is not by definition repressive
except when it's practiced.
Frigidus wrote:but now that it's become relatively popular it's suffered the usual downturn in coolness.
AndyDufresne wrote:[size=14]As we do not specifically have a rule covering this, we believe we are well within our proactive measures to stomp this out right here now.
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users