FloresDelMal wrote:Skoffin wrote:
As for the whole lynching argument, I'm only going to say that town should always lynch when they can - the only time town should no lynch is when the towns nightgame is stronger than the scums nightgame.
I can see the points made on Masket, on the other hand being on the fence is sortof his trademark. I'll reserve judgement for now.
Dakky is probably town, mostly because he seems exactly the sort of person to start shooting people the moment he's able to.FloresDelMal wrote:Now about the lovely but scummy skoff, i didnt realize that my vote was the fourth, but is not like i putted her at lynch -1, -2, heck not even -3, that was hardly a BW, but as things are my vote stands for now, yeah i might be joking when i say that she is ever scummy, but putting a vote on day 1 on someone who not only scummarine a lot, but also admitted to be skimming seemed, and still seems a good and logic day 1 choice to me, oh and by the way the dead scum also admited to skim before his early dismiss heh (classic scum signs are classic for a reason, they work)
While I don't think there is enough of anything to warrant finding you scummy, I do think "I didn't realise my vote was" is a bit of a cop out. Regardless of mods giving vote counts players should pay attention to how many votes are going where. Slight amusement that you call me out for scumarining a lot as justification for my apparent scummyness when you've done a fair bit of it yourself. For the record, I didn't say I was skimming - I said I didn't read it at all![]()
Skoff can you please elaborate more about dakky, you lost me there, i have not seen anything indicating that he could be town or scum, and also about MM i have been out of the mafia scene for so long that i dont remember much about his playing style, but in my vague memories i remember him as a good player, it doesnt match with half assed being his "trademark" but my memory is indeed cloudy, so if you could enlighten me i couldnt thank you enough
I suck at keeping vote counts, thats why i trust the mods, is their job after all, but it seems super weird to me the way you exaggeratedly reacted at the so called BW and even called a witch hunt, like if everyone who voted skoff must be scum seems like a super easy breezy way to try to get townies distracted from all the scumminess that is going on
Now about the submarining and the pot calling the kettle black business, you do have a point, but since i never log in i took longer than most to realize that the game had already started, and when i actually checked my role pm things were well into the joke vote stage, so to me it feels like i have been active, just that i prefer to adress to several concerns at once instead of doing individual posts for every little thing, i have always been fond of walls of text, heck i have read everything here; including the web generated funny text of kwan (which is only funnier if i replace skoff for fuku, our dog name)
Because i read and re read before posting it takes time, then i was on easter holidays with the frenchy and i forgot to pack my comp, and he forgot the tablet, so there goes a couple of days on standby, i accused you of skimming, you boldly said you didnt even bother to read, which is even worst, so what is your excuse for not posting
Dakky - someone, presumably a town vig, shot another player, I'd say dakky is a possibility for being that person. Along with people such as mandy. so for now now those two are in my likely town list.
MM - He is a decent player and I'm not suggesting he half-arses anything, but I do notice a tendency in his play to be 'on the fence', he's certainly not an aggressive player by any means. He's just slower to pick sides and advocate hard for them.
Yeah it's the mods jobs to give vote counts, but that isn't really a good excuse not to pay attention to where votes are going. Otherwise people could build up bandwagons or accidentally hammer and claim "oops didn't realise they were that close". 'Exaggeratedly' reacted? Personally I thought my reaction was mild at best; a suggestion as to a place to start looking considering it's D1 with no real leads yet, and barely a sentence mention when my standard these days is paragraphs.
Well since we are in the business of comparing posting habits; the last game you joined you were replaced D1 due to inactivity, and your claim here isn't entirely accurate - you actually did confirm in a reasonable time frame, it was actually after that that you had 'gone inactive' for a period of 5-6 days, around the same time as me actually. Hence why I find it somewhat odd, unfair even, that you are calling me out for submarining and basing my scummyness on it.
In the time since my return to this site I have only 'gone inactive' on two occasions and both medical related, outside of that I think I have proven I am one of the most active people in games at the moment and honestly I think I have earned a little slack. I do not talk a great deal instantly for any D1's, however once the game gets going I do get quite vocal - other games here are a testimony to that. You can even refer to BNI mafia that people have already referenced.
So I must ask, why are your excuses for being inactive for days valid but my reasons for being inactive for days are not and warrant being labelled scum?
As for the skimming/"I didn't read!" bit I thought it would be taken as the light hearted joke that it was intended to be. I didn't think people would take it seriously that I am refusing to even read the game, let alone accuse me of being scum for it.
mandalorian2298 wrote:FloresDelMal wrote:Now about the lovely but scummy skoff, i didnt realize that my vote was the fourth, but is not like i putted her at lynch -1, -2, heck not even -3, that was hardly a BW, but as things are my vote stands for now, yeah i might be joking when i say that she is ever scummy, but putting a vote on day 1 on someone who not only scummarine a lot, but also admitted to be skimming seemed, and still seems a good and logic day 1 choice to me, oh and by the way the dead scum also admited to skim before his early dismiss heh (classic scum signs are classic for a reason, they work)
This last part of Flores' quote IMO shows the flaw in the logic behind calling Day 1 lynch "random". There is such thing as scum tells. How many there are to be found depends on Scum's skill and will they be found and interpreted correctly depends on Town's skill, but the Town is far from helpless during Day 1. It's like that American saying about trespassers: "It's not the matter of 'if' - it's a matter of shooting at your bushes enough times."
Skoffin stopped posting for four days. Then I called her out on that. She came back, tried to defend herself, reacted to Flores' accusation and said he has a good feeling about dakky. That's basicaly it. Her play translates to: Avoid being lynch and scum can take care of themselves.
FOS Skoffin. Also, while emotionaly I would prefer to see if I'm right about Samlen, Skoffin is by far the most solid lynch target at this point so unvote vote Skoffin
The problem with classic scum tells is when you try to apply it to people where it is not a scumtell for that person. The notion here being that I am scum because I am exhibiting 'classic scumtells' of submarining and skimming. The first issue being that the skimming didn't happen and I joked that it did (why would I as scum gloat about not reading the game?) and the second is that in my history of gaming submarining has always been my tell as town, not as scum. But regardless of that, my inactivity this game was due to being distracted by health issues and is not alignment indicative. I'm not too worried about being lynched here,
on one hand townside can lose people and still do ok without me and on the other I'm fairly sure I'm not likely to be lynched today anyway. Soz, I have an ego as big as yours.

While I'm here, I concur with your statement on dakky, Tim and mitch. For Dakky I do believe I am getting better at scoping him out, but the other two no clue. As for mitch, he could literally be anything at any given time - he has zero tells because he isn't really playing. Dakky appears to be making efforts to improve his play (which I commend him for) whereas mitch appears to not care about getting better.
As for Sam, I have to disagree. My feels of Sam is that he would have come out with those posts as a townie, and he might have made those posts as scum too. I don't think that's a tell for him, while he certainly could be scum I don't think that's a reason to peg him as such.