edocsil wrote:edocsil wrote:blah
Dlanor here is mine. Haggis has tried to counter it a few times, but the one he really can't talk his way out of is his vote on Sax/ He has protested that he did it after Sax claimed but that is a lie, he did it only after sax claimed name and not role. IDK your background with the Matrix but the Oracle (sax's claim) is one of the most important good guys out there. The reason we nearly lynched him after his claim was his role was crazy. Now that Strike is just kinda ignoring it I have people connected to him and I think he would be an ideal lynch candidate.
So you admit I countered everything except(in your oppinion) 1 point in that case. yet you quote the whole case instead of stating your one point, cause a long ass "case" is more impressive right?
Now the only thing that is still in your "case". I voted sax after he claimed name but not role, therefore I'm out to kill the oracle correct?
Hmm, interesting that:
Page 26, Sax wagon starts:
strike wolf wrote:Ok my money had been on edoc and sax being scum but at this point I'm leaning slightly less towards edoc and am going to vote sax. I've looked back at his giant analysis post and from what I can tell he pretty much denied being any of the town roles. Other than that the analysis he stated made very little sense as well as most of his other posts.
First vote:
edocsil wrote:strike wolf wrote:Ok my money had been on edoc and sax being scum but at this point I'm leaning slightly less towards edoc and am going to vote sax. I've looked back at his giant analysis post and from what I can tell he pretty much denied being any of the town roles. Other than that the analysis he stated made very little sense as well as most of his other posts.
This is my biggest bone with Sax. He should know that there was no way to have that detailed of an idea for the game.
Unvote Vote Sax for intentional disinformation.
Jump, Jump, Jump on the waggon.
TheSaxlad wrote:Before you start a bandwagon on me, you should know that im unlynchable too guys.
and strike i never denied being a town role, in fact I am but I am not ready to give away what it is yet. There are some clues in my posts in pages before though.
If you can pick up on them they will tell you who I am.
O HAI. Hmm...
TheSaxlad wrote:strike wolf wrote:I'm not a mathematician but I'm pretty sure that unlynchable townie+unlynchable townie=unbalanced. two unlynchable townies that could subsequently be recruited by the cult and become two unlynchable cult members=even more unbalanced. Frankly I think you're lying and the fact that you've claimed unlynchable tells me that there's not really a downside to pushing for your lynch.
Strike I am unlynchable for a reason.
I am also bulletproof until someone dies.
and I am town.
O HAI X2 Wait let me make that bigger for you:
Strike I am unlynchable for a reason.
I am also bulletproof until someone dies.So what is this? Might edoc's sole remaining point against me be a complete lie? interesting
btw, here's me not being interested in sax:
Haggis_McMutton wrote:TheSaxlad wrote:strike wolf wrote:I'm not a mathematician but I'm pretty sure that unlynchable townie+unlynchable townie=unbalanced. two unlynchable townies that could subsequently be recruited by the cult and become two unlynchable cult members=even more unbalanced. Frankly I think you're lying and the fact that you've claimed unlynchable tells me that there's not really a downside to pushing for your lynch.
Strike I am unlynchable for a reason.
I am also bulletproof until someone dies.
and I am town.
I assume you're also a doctor, cop, vigilante and busdriver ...
At this point you've got to claim. You can't just say "oh btw I'm unlynchable and bulletproof. K, thnks" and expect to be left alone ...
Also, this is a comment in general. IF you are indeed a townie, for god's sake stop claiming out of the blue like this in every game. Claiming is a last resort ffs ...
Haggis_McMutton wrote:Plus if we lynch him and he somehow turns out to actually be also unlynchable I'm guessing the mod will give us a few extra days(and piss himself laughing cause we tried to lynch 2 unlynchable characters on D1)
So, yeah. We want to hear you claim Sax, or we'll just test it.
This was before the role claim. Yep i showed no interest in lynching him before I knew he'd claim oracle, completely true there my bud. Also it's not like I ALREADY QUOTED THESE POSTS IN MY DEFENSE.
Furthermore, I have stated this before so many times i've gotten sick of it, but let's try it again in big letters, maybe you'll catch it:
I called Sax out for lying about his role, I kept my vote on him for lying about his role. GUESS WHAT? He was lying about his role ... Apparently being right about people lying and maintaining your position is a scumtell, sorry I didn't flip flop all over the place like you did
There is absolutely no case on me. Nothing. Yet you keep fighting, manipulating and now outright lying to get me to claim. I'm starting to think this was your plan all along. Latch on to somebody, anybody and bite tight, eventually there'll be so much discussion generated on the bullshit case you make that the lynch looks favourable only because "we already have so much info about people supporting/distancing themselves from this guy, so we might as well pursue him".
Well guess what there's two people involved in this lovely dance, how about we look at you for a moment:
1. Scummiest player in the game by far ... check
2. your own case applies better to yourself ... check and admitted
edocsil wrote:Haggis, your right, many of those arguments apply to myself. And guess what? I was nearly lynched for it.
3. two confirmed connections ... check (what happens to them if you die anyway?)
4. only alive because it seems plausible that the merovingian is 3rd party ... check and admitted
Hmm, but there's some interesting issues with this claim of yours:
1. Tails makes a good point, you're a 3rd party survivor with a faction to back you up? You are obviously not mentioning some of your powers/win conditions. Question is are the things you're not mentioning going to help or hurt the town? From the way you've been playing, I'm going to guess it's the latter. Is it perhaps part of your win condition that certain town power roles are killed? That would at least explain your massive push for claims, claims, claims.
2. You've got a 3 man faction. If you are 3rd party there should be a mafia (another 3 people I'd guess). Now you mentioned the kill attempt on Violet, so another anti-town player there? So basically if you team up with the mafia you've got the town outnumbered at this point. This seems highly unlikely.
Well you know what, if it quacks like an anti-town player and it walks like an anti-town player I'm going to guess it's an anti-town player, merovingian or not.
vote edoc