kwanton wrote:MM you're next cuz ur starting to annoy me![]()
You're not the first.
Moderator: Community Team
kwanton wrote:MM you're next cuz ur starting to annoy me![]()
Minister Masket wrote:FOOL! T'WAS NOT IN BOLD!dominationnation wrote:dominationnation wrote:Ill hop on that train! Thats extreamly stupid to do huck since about 3 or 4 more times the amount of unions are dead than confeds. Im not sure that even he can be that dumb. I think that its a false claim. But thats scummy to so UNKILL KILL DUSTIN
Whoops. Wrong name there. UNKILL KILL HUCK
spurgistan wrote:Huckleberryhound wrote:Koesen wrote:unkill
I'm not sure what to think of nagerous, so I'm leaving him aside for now. The Neutrino-theory is interesting, but doesn't convince me to vote yet. I am therefore going to introfuce a brand new lead and
kill dustn
His predecessor complained of a 'boring role'. Dustn replaced him and voiced no such complaints, but resorted to submarining instead. I went back 15 pages, and all I could find was one rather unimportant question to the mod and one unmotivated bandwagon kill.
I think perhaps his predecessor joined hoping to actually fight in the civil war, then found out he got stuck with a third party role and Dustn now is lying low in the hopes to avoid attention and limiting his actions to whatever his nightrole allows him. He might be one of our native killers.
That theory works for me, at least we wont kill another union
kill dustin
Huck, did you just role-claim as Union? Gutsy call this late in the game, with the score like it is. And by gutsy I mean kinda dumb Kill: Huckleberryhound
spurgistan wrote:You didn't intentionally roleclaim, but the way you said "at least we won't kill another Union" kinda insinuates that you don't want to kill Union, which would only make sense if you were wearing a navy blue uniform
Huckleberryhound wrote:Considering how dumb the sides are here, and the fact that i can't be nightkilled, i don't mind roleclaiming in the slightest
If you want me to , just ask.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Anarkistsdream wrote:Huckleberryhound wrote:Considering how dumb the sides are here, and the fact that i can't be nightkilled, i don't mind roleclaiming in the slightest
If you want me to , just ask.
I could care less if you can't be nightkilled... That's why we're lynching ya, genius.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
dominationnation wrote:you obviosly dont understand Huck. You are being a retard. re read the last few pages and then post.
Anarkistsdream wrote:I don't understand your ENORMOUS leap of logic...
We are killing you because you are a Union soldier. However, why would I care about your roleclaim? You'll die before it ever becomes night.
Huckleberryhound wrote:Anarkistsdream wrote:I don't understand your ENORMOUS leap of logic...
We are killing you because you are a Union soldier. However, why would I care about your roleclaim? You'll die before it ever becomes night.
You are so sure that i am a union soldier....would you like to bet money on it ?
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
The1exile wrote:works for me. Kill Huck cuz i never liked him anyway.
spurgistan wrote:OK Huck, feel free to explain why you said you didn't want to lynch Union soldiers.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users