safariguy5 wrote:Well, considering this is Knox, having played with him before, I do believe this is how he plays anyways. Sure, that was an OMGUS vote on /, but I'm inclined to give more leeway to someone who managed to convince us to not hammer him yesterday without revealing role. It could very well be that the role is so important for town to not lose. After all, to me, it's easier to kill talkative scum than submarining scum because the talkative ones will probably make a mistake or freudian slip or something eventually. I'm actually going to go with the original line of argument and vote streaker. Submarining has me worried about him as clearly there is some very contentious debate going on as well as failing to respond to knox's case on him from yesterday.
Wait right there. You say that I am submarining, while there are others out there with less then HALF my posts? Yes, I'm pointing my finger to Sax...
About Knox' case on me, at that time there was no need yet to make a big defense. When a few votes were turned on me, at the beginning of the day, I explained myself... That could hardly be considered 'failing' to respond on the case against me.
As for the 'contentious' debate, as you call it, that's just the point. A lot has been said, leaving little for me to add. I'd hate to repeat other players cases.
It is quite obvious how you are trying to protect Knox, here. Draw away attention from him by shifting focus on him, to me. Al this while you aren't even paying attention to ALL of the arguments against Knox?
Ofcourse it's possible for Knox to be town, but if he's lynched and turns out scum, safariguy will make a lovely target for the next day... (It feels like he's protecting his fellow maffia, maybe even boss).
That said, I really won't repeat much of the case against Knox other then that it's very suspicious of how he has been manipulating town. And I don't like being manipulated. It's what scum would do. The part that stands out above all, to me, is where he immediatly halts conversation that is aimed towards him, or at someone he doesn't want investigated. Instead, he only focuses or promotes cases that he lead to in the first place.
I'll try and see if I can find some more evidence to the cooperation between safari and Knox, hoping to better support the case.
For now, Knox is at L-2 if I counted correctly, and I won't put him at L-1 until he can claim. (Nothing wrong with asking for a claim at this point, right?)
FoS safariguy5
[/quote]
) 
