Moderator: Community Team
Aegnor wrote:Alright, then it looks very fishy to me, I hope I didn't make a mistake by voting him.
Colaalone wrote:Aegnor wrote:Alright, then it looks very fishy to me, I hope I didn't make a mistake by voting him.
REALLY makes me think he is scum. Looks like an attempt for a mafia who knows he voted to lynch townie trying to clear his name for later.
VOTE: Aegnor
unriggable wrote:You always need a degree of uncertainty when voting to lynch. FOS Colaalone
unriggable wrote:Colaalone wrote:Aegnor wrote:Alright, then it looks very fishy to me, I hope I didn't make a mistake by voting him.
REALLY makes me think he is scum. Looks like an attempt for a mafia who knows he voted to lynch townie trying to clear his name for later.
VOTE: Aegnor
You always need a degree of uncertainty when voting to lynch. FOS Colaalone
As for hitman, I would consult against voting for him. Why? Becuase I am trying to catch the serial killer (one poerson, one kill each night). We know that the serial killer A. killed mandy (very unlikely) B. got his kill protected (also unlikely) or C. Never set his action. Since hitman posted during the nighttime, we know that he did not have an action to send. SO he is not the serial killer OR the vig.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
unriggable wrote:Colaalone wrote:Aegnor wrote:Alright, then it looks very fishy to me, I hope I didn't make a mistake by voting him.
REALLY makes me think he is scum. Looks like an attempt for a mafia who knows he voted to lynch townie trying to clear his name for later.
VOTE: Aegnor
You always need a degree of uncertainty when voting to lynch. FOS Colaalone
As for hitman, I would consult against voting for him. Why? Becuase I am trying to catch the serial killer (one poerson, one kill each night). We know that the serial killer A. killed mandy (very unlikely) B. got his kill protected (also unlikely) or C. Never set his action. Since hitman posted during the nighttime, we know that he did not have an action to send. SO he is not the serial killer OR the vig.
Colaalone wrote:unriggable wrote:You always need a degree of uncertainty when voting to lynch. FOS Colaalone
Yeah of course, but publicly annoucing it like that seems like nothing more than "DONT BLAME ME WHEN HE IS A TOWNIE"
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
unriggable wrote:As for hitman, I would consult against voting for him. Why? Becuase I am trying to catch the serial killer (one poerson, one kill each night). We know that the serial killer A. killed mandy (very unlikely) B. got his kill protected (also unlikely) or C. Never set his action. Since hitman posted during the nighttime, we know that he did not have an action to send. SO he is not the serial killer OR the vig.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Anarkistsdream wrote:Supposed to be...? They are pro-town, but they can make mistakes and kill the wrong person.
Syzygy wrote:Anarkistsdream wrote:Supposed to be...? They are pro-town, but they can make mistakes and kill the wrong person.
But if you have an experiened vig. who doesn't target people for stupid reasons then wouldn't he'd be more of an asset than a liabilty?
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Users browsing this forum: mookiemcgee