heavycola wrote:
Accidents of geography and environment brought about the domination of European whites, not racial differences.
Put simply, we had more animal species to domesticate, more native crops, and a dense population (as a result) that bred immunities to diseases by living in close proximity to each other and to our livestock.
It was luck.
I have a distinct feeling of deja-vu here.
Anyhow, I will continue.
The siole reason for the domination, advanced thinking, hard working in built mentality of the north european peoples, was due to the hardships that were faced during their expansion into the north of europe.#
It is laughable that you have this idea that the cold, biting tundra of northern europe somehow had "more animals to domesticate"...as opposed to the warmer climates of africa, for instance.
What you fail to comprehend, is that there were no native crops in northern europe....corn was originally an unpalatable crop from the asian peninsula...this had been nurtured by the northern europeans into being an edible crop, to which we built a tolerance for, as with cows milk, too.
See, the reason why the white race has a higher level of industrious thought, is that the long baron winters, and lack of native wildlife readily available, caused said peoples to have to develop a strong sense of community, and also overcome far greater challenges, than, say africans, who had walking meals on their doorsteps, for whenever they could be assed to throw a spear.
This is one of the reasons why there is wide-famine issues within africa, as they just ate, and ate without any foresight for future production. They have not got the in-built tools to cope with forward thinking, or overcoming challenges...It's pretty simple Cola, white people had challenges = bigger brains.
"Give a black man a fish,. he eats for a day...give him a fishing rod, he tries to attack someone with it, and steal their fish"
