Moderator: Cartographers
natty_dread wrote:Nope, it does get lifted. The updates just haven't gone live yet.
+1 per 3 territory bonus removed - you get +3 for any amount
Seamus76 wrote:+1 per 3 territory bonus removed - you get +3 for any amount
Maybe my brain is not working properly today, but I don't get this. Should this be a region bonus instead of a "territory" bonus? You already get +1 for every 2 territories within a region, so is this an additional +1 for just getting more territories? Or should it be +1 for holding 3 total "regions", i.e. hold all of Victoria Land, Scott Land, and Halley Land equals an additional +1?
SirSebstar wrote:natty_dread wrote:Nope, it does get lifted. The updates just haven't gone live yet.
what the man above me said..
natty_dread wrote:Sigh...
People complained when we reduced the starting positions to 4. We increased it back to 8, and now...
How about a compromise? If we set them at 6 everyone should be happy, right?
Or 5?
HighlanderAttack wrote:I suggest checking into the new 1v1 games that are starting and checking the chat out. I wish more players did express opinions though because if only a few do so it skews what most people probably think.
greenoaks wrote:i don't care how many people complain about you reducing starting territories. increasing starting territories to a point where the game is over before the 1st round takes all the skill and strategy out of playing the map.
you might as well put in a victory condition of whoever goes first wins and save everyone some time.
greenoaks wrote:i don't care how many people complain about you reducing starting territories. increasing starting territories to a point where the game is over before the 1st round takes all the skill and strategy out of playing the map.
you might as well put in a victory condition of whoever goes first wins and save everyone some time.
Silvanus wrote:perch is a North Korean agent to infiltrate south Korean girls
Silvanus wrote:perch is a North Korean agent to infiltrate south Korean girls
HighlanderAttack wrote:if u started the bases with 1 army then it becomes more even --even with 8 starting points--I still like three starting points either way--I see that not too many players were shocked with the new 8 starting points based on all the comments
mr. CD wrote:On a side note, I would like to thank you for the map, it's awesome (even if it was more awesome).
HighlanderAttack wrote:if u started the bases with 1 army then it becomes more even --even with 8 starting points--I still like three starting points either way--I see that not too many players were shocked with the new 8 starting points based on all the comments
isaiah40 wrote:I am thinking that maybe we should go with getting a flat 3 men per turn no matter how many territories you hold, but that may cause players to just stack on their bases.
Users browsing this forum: manrayeyes