SirSebstar wrote:You are mixing up the site rule of farming noobs with clanfarming. 2 completely different things, I would have thought you knew that.
No clanmedals will be given if a clanwar is deemed unfair in the eyes of the TD. It is assumed that any game but the finals or the final 4 is not going to recieve a clanwar medal.
Try to compare it with a multi event tournament. You can only get a medal for actually winning the damm thing. If you won an underlying tournament that awards you the finals spot, you do not also get another medal for winning the finals
Then the final 8 and final 4 aren't getting clan war medals, but a tournament medal for the conqueror's cup?
That's the only thing that makes sense if you're pulling this horse patooey
and since I never EVER saw an official definition of "clanfarming" it's horse patooey anyway. but if there is one? it should be in accordance with site rules for other types of farming
otherwise, why the f* should any top clan want to be bothered with 41- plus skirmishes against peons since it's not recognized?
Oh, and if that's the case? then any of those "wins" those top clans make should not count in any win percentage for any ranking purposes whatsoever.
But which ranking system is being used? A not-too-long-ago news thread discussed not one, not two, not three, but four EXISTING rank systems and an additional one being evaluated/created because none of those other four were deemed worthy enough.
Perspective again.
It's my perspective that this whole thing is a crock.
Especially on a site that CLAIMS they don't want "rank bias"
"Clan farming" should be defined similarly to "noob farming" - inappropriate if done repeatedly; innocent if just giving some new clans a swing at the experienced fellas.and should never have been applied to serial skirmishes.
And, your assessment of only giving top 4 or winner a medal is in the garbage when at the same time, you look, and a different "clan tournament" series is being given medals for ALL rounds.
Existing interpretations are full of reverse-Rank bias. Newcomers can earn clan war medals for clan tournaments, ALL rounds (they have, go look!), but participants in a series that's less discriminatory (but still requires EXPERIENCED clans) cannot.
(THOTA, did you forget to bags on your horses during the last parade? I'm seeing a lot of horsesh*t all over the place and wonder where it came from
)
p.s. OSA had a chance to beat us. Slim perhaps, but at least three of the games they lost (probably more, but I was personally in 3 so know what happened in those) was primarily due to one of their members deadbeating (which overcame drop and early dice effects and resulted in Legends taking the games after all). So what if they'd won, would they have gotten a medal? They would've deserved it, wouldn't they?
p.p.s. nippersean, I hear that things "might" be sorted by the end of June.
Meanwhile, there's still this existing inconsistency in determining what occurs re: clan war medals with "serial clan tournaments" and that shouldn't be.