Moderator: Community Team
Pirlo wrote:Fix Round Limit of Team Games
Make the system count the overall team troops instead of counting the highest individual
In this Game 9923462, team 1 was given the win because one of its members had the highest amount of troops, while team 2 (who lost the game) had more troops in total. I think total troops of ONE team should be the decisive instead.
chapcrap wrote:Pirlo wrote:Fix Round Limit of Team Games
Make the system count the overall team troops instead of counting the highest individual
In this Game 9923462, team 1 was given the win because one of its members had the highest amount of troops, while team 2 (who lost the game) had more troops in total. I think total troops of ONE team should be the decisive instead.
Totally agree!
Maybe this is a bug?
L M S wrote:Thanks for doing the dirty work and posting this in here Pirlo.
Clearly I agree with this suggestion. Whats the point of a team game again?
just sayin'.
chapcrap wrote:Pirlo wrote:Fix Round Limit of Team Games
Make the system count the overall team troops instead of counting the highest individual
In this Game 9923462, team 1 was given the win because one of its members had the highest amount of troops, while team 2 (who lost the game) had more troops in total. I think total troops of ONE team should be the decisive instead.
Totally agree!
Maybe this is a bug?
TheForgivenOne wrote:chapcrap wrote:Pirlo wrote:Fix Round Limit of Team Games
Make the system count the overall team troops instead of counting the highest individual
In this Game 9923462, team 1 was given the win because one of its members had the highest amount of troops, while team 2 (who lost the game) had more troops in total. I think total troops of ONE team should be the decisive instead.
Totally agree!
Maybe this is a bug?
Not a bug, lack coded it this way.
Evil Semp wrote:It is a team game so the total team troops should be what is used.
greenoaks wrote:Evil Semp wrote:It is a team game so the total team troops should be what is used.
i agree.
any word from our master about why he wants team games to not be decided by the teams total effort
Metsfanmax wrote:greenoaks wrote:Evil Semp wrote:It is a team game so the total team troops should be what is used.
i agree.
any word from our master about why he wants team games to not be decided by the teams total effort
There wasn't particularly serious objection at the time, partially because you can achieve the same result just by forting all your troops to your teammate. There's nothing unfair about that approach because it doesn't benefit one team at the expense of another. Everyone has the same standard applied to them.
greenoaks wrote:but you can't always fort ALL of your troops to one player due to map design, neutrals and the other team's terits blocking the path. adjacent forts would make it nigh on impossible.
Metsfanmax wrote:greenoaks wrote:but you can't always fort ALL of your troops to one player due to map design, neutrals and the other team's terits blocking the path. adjacent forts would make it nigh on impossible.
OK, but those things apply to both teams. If you didn't plan ahead and make your troops movable to one of your partners well in advance, then you weren't planning properly.
If you want to criticize the current system, fine. It's not very logical. But don't say it's unfair unless you can back up that claim.
Evil Semp wrote:It is a team game so the total team troops should be what is used.
Metsfanmax wrote:greenoaks wrote:but you can't always fort ALL of your troops to one player due to map design, neutrals and the other team's terits blocking the path. adjacent forts would make it nigh on impossible.
OK, but those things apply to both teams. If you didn't plan ahead and make your troops movable to one of your partners well in advance, then you weren't planning properly.
If you want to criticize the current system, fine. It's not very logical. But don't say it's unfair unless you can back up that claim.
Metsfanmax wrote:greenoaks wrote:Evil Semp wrote:It is a team game so the total team troops should be what is used.
i agree.
any word from our master about why he wants team games to not be decided by the teams total effort
There wasn't particularly serious objection at the time, partially because you can achieve the same result just by forting all your troops to your teammate. There's nothing unfair about that approach because it doesn't benefit one team at the expense of another. Everyone has the same standard applied to them.
Evil Semp wrote: By forting all troops to one player changes it from PLAYING the game and just trying to win. The journey to winning the game should be playing the game.
greenoaks wrote:where in the Instructions or the announcement thread by Lack does it state team games are decided by 1 individual?
Return to Archived Suggestions
Users browsing this forum: No registered users