Okay, so with this new day it is time for a new case. (Well, ghostly already starting this yesterday, but it was never really going to get anywhere.) Chapcrap, I have gone back through your posts and found somethings fthat ghostly didn't bring up yesterday that I find scummy.
chapcrap wrote:Secondly, I believe newguy1 I think, but we have to make a case by Wednesday, so I think it's best to at least have him claim and get some information before I unvote. Sorry newguy. I don't think you're that scummy, but something has to happen on Day 1.
Admits that he didn't think that Newguy was scum but joined the bandwagon anyway. Should going after people that you think are probably town and making them claim just for the sake of having someone claim really even be considered scum hunting?
strike wolf wrote:... I know about as much as town does about Some7hing. ...
Are you saying you're not town?
Odd slip from a usually thorough player.
Here he is taking a line slightly out of context and trying to suggest it to be a scum-slip.
chapcrap wrote:It doesn't make sense to lynch the only claimed doctor. If we're worred about whether or not he's insane, he doesn't have to target people for now, but lynching him does not seem right to me. I've already been burned by this.
If you believe SomethingClever's claim then this is basically telling the doctor not to use his powers. If you disbelieve his claim, then this could be him giving a scum mate a hint on how to avoid having to fake future actions which could be disproved. (by a watcher or something)
Besides these few instances, his actions in the game prior to the feud with ghostly can be primarily described as "safe." I am starting to think too safe. I admit that what I have here right now is a rather weak case. I didn't have time to analyze all the back and forth vs ghostly in the latter part of Day 2 just yet, but how badly does that need to be retreaded? We can probably just take half of it as it is. Anyhow, I have to Vote Chapcrap
today, as something tells me that ghostly was right about something.
While looking back, I also remembered that I don't recall Jak ever answering this for me.
spiesr wrote:I think I would feel more confident, Jak, if you could let us know some of the flavor of your role. (Without doing anything that would stray into quoting of course.) I mean, what sort of nature is your character portrayed as having according to your role pm?