Moderator: Community Team
Jdsizzleslice wrote:Find a map you are extremely good at, find out specific settings that you feel comfortable with, then put them out in the public. You won't win all of them, but most of them. For me, it is 8 man Assassin Middle Ages games.
nagerous wrote:Dibbun is a well known psychotic from the forums
Army of GOD wrote:Congrats to Dibbun, the white jesus, and all of his mercy and forgiveness.
Jdsizzleslice wrote: So you can crawl back to whatever psychosocial nutjob hole you came from.
rhp 1 wrote:2000 points is a baseline with the better players on here... you need to find a map/settings you're strong on so if you go on a bad streak you can recharge... I'd say all and all holding brig or higher is the toughest unless you have a map/settings that you dominate on and play almost exclusively (boring and takes a lot of discipline)... if you play a wide variety of maps, # players, settings, 1900+ is good...
codierose wrote:go to live chat invite as many newbies noobs etc as you can you never know you could make it to conquerer sooner than you think
personally i like just playing for medals you will find as you pick up the medals your rank will improve have fun. CC will love you and hate you
all hail randombullshit.org
Agent 86 wrote:codierose wrote:go to live chat invite as many newbies noobs etc as you can you never know you could make it to conquerer sooner than you think
personally i like just playing for medals you will find as you pick up the medals your rank will improve have fun. CC will love you and hate you
all hail randombullshit.org
So funny and where is the fun of beating noobs. But with the randombullshit.org you will not rise to to the top unless you manipulate your games.
Boring CC..fix the set up you have..
86
swimmerdude99 wrote:When I stick to team games I easily stay above 2500 but when I start playing 1v1s or any type of standard games with lower ranks no matter how many I win (unless its like 50%) I can't stay up because when lower ranks win they take like 40 points.
chang50 wrote:When I manage to claw my way up to 2000 points,I find I have to win 2.5 games for every loss just to hold rank.
chapcrap wrote:chang50 wrote:When I manage to claw my way up to 2000 points,I find I have to win 2.5 games for every loss just to hold rank.
I find this to be unbelievable. You have to win 71% of your games to break even? Maybe as a Brig or higher. Not as a major.
chapcrap wrote:chang50 wrote:When I manage to claw my way up to 2000 points,I find I have to win 2.5 games for every loss just to hold rank.
I find this to be unbelievable. You have to win 71% of your games to break even? Maybe as a Brig or higher. Not as a major.
agentcom wrote:I thought for sure I'd hold on to my hat the last time I got it based on the games I was involved in. Alas, no luck. What chap said earlier is exactly right. It will depend on what types of games you're playing. For example, I consider myself a fairly solid player who likes to mix up maps and settings. I join a fair share of tournaments and also have multiple groups of people that I like to play with whether it's dubs, trips or quads. I have a couple go to maps that I know I'll gain points on, but I don't like to have too many games of the same type going on at a time. I don't think that I'm in danger of losing these swords anytime soon, but I know that it's going to be awhile before I'll hold on to a hat for any extended period of time. So for my style of play, I'd say it gets "hard" for me to hold on to my rank at colonel. If I played exclusively 1 v 1 games on my strongest maps, it would probably start getting hard much higher than that.
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users