Moderator: Tournament Directors
Gillipig wrote:When I search for my tournament games only 1 come up, but it says there are 8 games.
greenoaks wrote:Gillipig wrote:When I search for my tournament games only 1 come up, but it says there are 8 games.
you can only see fully invited games if you are in them.
it is not a bug. CC wants to make it easier for freemiums to join games so they removed TO's ability to easily track their tournaments.
Night Strike wrote:They're supposed to be redoing it so at the very least organizers can see their own tournament games.
greenoaks wrote:Night Strike wrote:They're supposed to be redoing it so at the very least organizers can see their own tournament games.
that would be great but that still doesn't help us see if a freemium has slots available.
Gilligan wrote:greenoaks wrote:Night Strike wrote:They're supposed to be redoing it so at the very least organizers can see their own tournament games.
that would be great but that still doesn't help us see if a freemium has slots available.
Doesn't it?
You couldn't see pending reservations before this anyway.
Once a single invite is accepted, isn't it back to its original state?
Gilligan wrote:
Gillipig wrote:And somebody should fix the underlying problem. This update is clearly not appreciated by the TO's, why else would the natural response be that it must be some kind of bug?
chapcrap wrote:Gillipig wrote:And somebody should fix the underlying problem. This update is clearly not appreciated by the TO's, why else would the natural response be that it must be some kind of bug?
It's already been stated somewhere else that they are working on a fix for this.
I'm hoping it will come soon.
greenoaks wrote:chapcrap wrote:Gillipig wrote:And somebody should fix the underlying problem. This update is clearly not appreciated by the TO's, why else would the natural response be that it must be some kind of bug?
It's already been stated somewhere else that they are working on a fix for this.
I'm hoping it will come soon.
working, they were made aware this would be a problem 1 month prior to implementing this
Night Strike wrote:So everyone's clear, none of the TDs can do anything about this, so continually posting about it won't help. I've already been told by rds that it should be fixed by the end of the week but hopefully sooner. He's pestering the coder to get it fixed, and if the deadline passes, I'll bug him again for a fix. The TDs were not involved in submitting or consulting on the update that caused the problem, so we were just as in the dark about it going to happen as you all were.
greenoaks wrote:Night Strike wrote:So everyone's clear, none of the TDs can do anything about this, so continually posting about it won't help. I've already been told by rds that it should be fixed by the end of the week but hopefully sooner. He's pestering the coder to get it fixed, and if the deadline passes, I'll bug him again for a fix. The TDs were not involved in submitting or consulting on the update that caused the problem, so we were just as in the dark about it going to happen as you all were.
i wasn't aware anyone thought you guys had anything to do with this.
why weren't you asked to give input/feedback?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users