virus90 wrote:well i definitely want to at least try to get the discussion going, maybe a vote cant be reached, but the discussion might be useful, even if no-one gets lynched at all.
I will vote: Anarkistdream
Because he has been kind of leading on 3 cases, Melkor, Safari and Mtamburini and now back onto melkor. Neither of which i think was very solid. Also in other games that I played with him, i get the feeling he is "voting less often" or at least sticks more to the same people.
I explain this to myself as might be scum because; in this game he kind of is the one leading the game, no one else really took initiative, so that leaves opportunity to start a vote and see where it gets you. looking through my possible scum glasses i see: Since melkor did not work, switch to safari, that did not work, okay swich mtamburini, ah that works, well he got modkilled, then try benga again, maybe it will stick this time. He seems eager to lynch on weak cases, the reasoning of his last vote on melkor maybe the weakest yet.
My goodness...you can't even get the names in your case straight. At this point, there is no way we get a lynch...
Nebuchadnezer wrote:Wowzers...this is interesting. Scum bells are ringing loud and clear here...
First we have the safariguy case, where he recommends a lynch on an inactive...this has been discussed.
Anark has some rather rude and snippy comments. I do find that those types of posts usually come from scum. It's an overreaction to a small and unfounded accusation. By hurling insults, he hopes to intimidate anyone from voting him further, while distracting the rest of us from the real issue. I'd vote him, but...
...the most damming to me is...
mtamburani...I would side with him on Anark, not because of the great cases he made, but because of Anark's scummy reaction. However, BOTH of his cases are clear and blatant OMGUS. I mean, seriously, your "scum" hunting consists of accusing the two players that voted you of being scum. That's not hunting, it's freaking out and throwing accusations around hoping to redirect. In fact, they are not even cases, they are assumptions and guesses. You might as well have said, "everyone could be scum, because they could be scum."
So far, my votes goes...VOTE MTAMBURINI You, sir are most deserving of a claiming.
I go back to my original post and
vote Anarkistsdream...getting closer to L-2...