[Abandoned] - Mexican-American War

Abandoned and Vacationed maps. The final resting place, unless you recycle.

Moderators: Cartographers, Global Moderators

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

[Abandoned] - Mexican-American War

Postby Gemineye on Thu Mar 29, 2007 9:18 pm

LET ME KNOW IF YOU GUYS WANT ME TO START THIS BACK UP!





update 9
Image

update 9
changed Railway
cosmetic adjustments
added ship
moved image from Gulf of Mexico
added Stations to the railway
took out the black abyss in the NE corner
adjusted New Mexico's bonus



Update 8:
Changed Legend
Changed Bridges

Update 3:
Changed Railway from dashes to dots. [update 2]
Removed The Alamo. [update 2]
Changed width of Rivers. [update 2]
Changed border width of Regions and Territories
Added another Region (unorganized), with Indian Territories.
Darkened the red in the Unorganized region.
Added Textures to the entire map.
Toned down the "plastic/rubbery" effect.

Update 4:

Changed the effect of the water.
Changed the Legend.
Re-worded the railroad explanation.
Added Mountains
Added "one way" attacks from Choctaws.
Changed the Railway to red, to help from blending in.

Update 5
Removed "extra" rivers.
Changed Legend Art.
Changed Railroad.
Added Art to the Gulf of Mexico.
Changed Railroad description.
Moved the Los Angeles script to the ocean border.
Changed ocean graphic.
Fine tuned a few of the circles/numbers.

Update 6
Changed Bridges.
Added info on one way attacks.
Lightened ocean color to help match w/ the Gulf of Mexico.
Cleared a path in the New Mexico Mountains for the railway.


1st draft:

Image
Last edited by Gemineye on Mon Jul 14, 2008 6:55 am, edited 37 times in total.
Major Gemineye
 
Posts: 46
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 1:10 am
Medals: 11
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (2) Ratings Achievement (2)

Postby Bad Speler on Thu Mar 29, 2007 10:45 pm

yes, continue, but it will need some work. I vote either making it just the Alamo, or the American Mexican war.
Highest Score: 2532
Highest Position: 69 (a long time ago)
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Bad Speler
 
Posts: 1027
Joined: Fri Jun 02, 2006 8:16 pm
Location: Ottawa
Medals: 24
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (3) Assassin Achievement (2) Freestyle Achievement (2)
Fog of War Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (3) Ratings Achievement (1) Tournament Achievement (4)
Map Contribution (2)

Postby ClessAlvein on Fri Mar 30, 2007 12:44 am

I've in favour of an American-Mexican war. There's something about having a building the size of Texas that bothers me.
Major ClessAlvein
 
Posts: 151
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 9:30 pm
Medals: 5
Standard Achievement (1) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (2)

Postby Gemineye on Fri Mar 30, 2007 1:08 am

havent you heard?

everything's BIGGER in Texas! (Texan speaking)

lol

in all seriousness, i have started an edit, taking the Alamo out, it should be up soon.
Major Gemineye
 
Posts: 46
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 1:10 am
Medals: 11
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (2) Ratings Achievement (2)

updated to mexican american war

Postby Gemineye on Fri Mar 30, 2007 1:30 am

here is the updated map, taking out the Alamo. i also toned the rivers down a bit, they seemed a bit much, as well as adjusted the "railway".

thoughts/suggestions please.

Image
Major Gemineye
 
Posts: 46
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 1:10 am
Medals: 11
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (2) Ratings Achievement (2)

Postby Samus on Fri Mar 30, 2007 2:11 am

My initial thoughts:

I count 29 territories. For playability sake, I feel the minimum any map should have is 8 territories per player. For a 4 player map, that would be 32 territories, so you need to add at least 3 territories. I feel 36 or more would be much better, and I know others agree.

You have a lot of rivers that serve no purpose as boundaries, I would limit them to only the ones that divide territories.

The railroad will need some work graphically. Make it actual railroad tracks and railroad stations.
User avatar
Major Samus
 
Posts: 372
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 12:33 pm

Postby Gemineye on Fri Mar 30, 2007 2:12 am

Figured i could post the breakdown.


New Mexico - 7 territories - 4 borders
Mexico - 8 territories - 4 borders
Texas - 4 territories - 3 borders
S US - 6 territories - 3 borders
N US - 4 territories - 3 borders


also, if you guys think it would be a good idea, i can add territories to "unorganized territory" and "Oregon country"....just to add more to the board.
Major Gemineye
 
Posts: 46
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 1:10 am
Medals: 11
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (2) Ratings Achievement (2)

Postby Samus on Fri Mar 30, 2007 2:20 am

Gemineye wrote:also, if you guys think it would be a good idea, i can add territories to "unorganized territory" and "Oregon country"....just to add more to the board.


Yes, I definitely do. Five regions is rather few anyway, and you need more territories.
User avatar
Major Samus
 
Posts: 372
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 12:33 pm

Postby Gemineye on Fri Mar 30, 2007 2:29 am

Samus wrote:You have a lot of rivers that serve no purpose as boundaries, I would limit them to only the ones that divide territories.


well, i explained this in my first post, that seemed to get overlooked. i do understand that there are a lot of "extra" rivers--reason being that i was hoping to keep w/ a very accurate play map. if you guys think i should take off a few of them, i will, but in the newest updated map, i made the rivers much less conspicuous. as far as taking the ones out that dont divide territories, all of them divide a territory-its just a matter of where they divide it. example: the river coming through Louisiana...it cuts through, but eventually serves as TWO borders, one for the mid part of texas, bordering unorganized territory, and one that goes up through the middle of the US.

working on adding some more territories, i just dont know if i can find some accurate ways to divide up "unorganized.." or "oregon.."


let me know what you guys think i should do, im all ears
Major Gemineye
 
Posts: 46
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 1:10 am
Medals: 11
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (2) Ratings Achievement (2)

Postby cairnswk on Fri Mar 30, 2007 3:18 am

Hi Gemineye....yes i think this would be a good map with some work.

* Remove the rivers that aren't borders of territories
* the mountains at the bottom of Oregon Country don't seem to fulfill a purpose; are there mountains that can be made into borders between territories in that region
* i like the idea of having the Alamo in there, but some design work needs to be included in texas if it is to exist there; perhaps it could have bonuses for holding it
* are the dotted lines actually rail lines or just links between railheads? If they are just railheads, then perhaps the dotted line can be removed to clear up the map a bit and bonuses notated for holding the railheads. If the dotted lines are rail lines, then perhaps explore ways to express that in a manner that doesn't clutter the map; i think the idea of rail-lines would give your map some definite graphic enhancement to make it appealing, but rail-lines would have to be expressed unobtrusively and not in cflict with the territory borders - do explore that however.
* is this the large map at 772 pixels wide? if this is the large map then any enhancements need to be accommodated comfortably in the small map, I have discovered that many players prefer to use a small map.
* I think perhaps the territory border line will be too thick.
* I like the colours generally, they are not too bright, but perhaps rethink red to a softer tone it stands out wildely.
* perhaps try a pattern on the ocean to see what that looks like also

Keep up the great work.
Hope this helps some.
User avatar
Corporal cairnswk
 
Posts: 11490
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 8:32 pm
Medals: 50
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (1) Teammate Achievement (1)
Cross-Map Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (3) General Achievement (2) Map Contribution (35) General Contribution (3)

Postby Gemineye on Fri Mar 30, 2007 4:11 am

cairnswk wrote:* Remove the rivers that aren't borders of territories


every river is a border somewhere. are you guys wanting me to not let the river have a "mouth" to the ocean, and just appear as if from no where?

cairnswk wrote:* the mountains at the bottom of Oregon Country don't seem to fulfill a purpose; are there mountains that can be made into borders between territories in that region


well, i was just experimenting w/ some hand drawn mountains, and forgot to take them off, can easily be removed.

cairnswk wrote:* i like the idea of having the Alamo in there, but some design work needs to be included in texas if it is to exist there; perhaps it could have bonuses for holding it


well, in the first version, it has bonus for holding texas AND the alamo, but i actually think it is just too much to have the Alamo building take up pretty much all of Texas-which it would have to do, to make it worth having on the map.

cairnswk wrote:* are the dotted lines actually rail lines or just links between railheads? If they are just railheads, then perhaps the dotted line can be removed to clear up the map a bit and bonuses notated for holding the railheads. If the dotted lines are rail lines, then perhaps explore ways to express that in a manner that doesn't clutter the map; i think the idea of rail-lines would give your map some definite graphic enhancement to make it appealing, but rail-lines would have to be expressed unobtrusively and not in cflict with the territory borders - do explore that however.


i dont plan on putting bonus on the railways. they are simply a connection between un-bordering territories, and give an added strategy to this map. they only connect through the railway line. i.e. the rail "station" in Montanas only connects to the one in Texas and Iowa Territory, not to Louisiana or Mexico City. if the brown dots dont work well for the railway, what would? i know that Samus suggested actual railroad tracks, but i thought THAT would be very obtrusive...ideas?

cairnswk wrote:* is this the large map at 772 pixels wide? if this is the large map then any enhancements need to be accommodated comfortably in the small map, I have discovered that many players prefer to use a small map. * I think perhaps the territory border line will be too thick.


this is, in fact, the large map. as far as the borders being too thick-i have looked at the 600 version, and they dont seem too big-in the big map the region borders are 6px, and the territory are 4px. so, the small map makes them significantly smaller. if they are too large, i will gladly change them.


cairnswk wrote:* perhaps try a pattern on the ocean to see what that looks like also


i will happily start some textures once we work out the other details.



the feedback is much appreciated, hopefully my first map will be a decent one. :D
Major Gemineye
 
Posts: 46
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 1:10 am
Medals: 11
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (2) Ratings Achievement (2)

Postby cairnswk on Fri Mar 30, 2007 4:25 am

Rivers...sorry in understand now. Forget that one.

Mountains - this is a good graphic, use it more to your advantage, don't remove, reposition them so they give the map some terrain content - do you know what i mean?

Alamo - OK but I like the idea of it being there somehow.

Try the railroad tracks and give veiwers a look at what it looks like. I agree with Samus.

The borders on most maps - most being the key word - appear to be 1 pixel on small maps between territories. Maybe do an adjustment and see what it looks like.
User avatar
Corporal cairnswk
 
Posts: 11490
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 8:32 pm
Medals: 50
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (1) Fog of War Achievement (1) Speed Achievement (1) Teammate Achievement (1)
Cross-Map Achievement (1) Ratings Achievement (3) General Achievement (2) Map Contribution (35) General Contribution (3)

Postby mibi on Fri Mar 30, 2007 8:48 am

i think a lot of CC map drafts recently are looking too plastic or rubbery due to all the blending options going on.

learn to reduce the transparency on those! 100% is rarely necessary. unless the map is suppose to look like a kids toy.
User avatar
Captain mibi
 
Posts: 3360
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 8:19 pm
Location: The Great State of Vermont
Medals: 13
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (1) Terminator Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (1) Map Contribution (5)
General Contribution (3)

Postby Gemineye on Fri Mar 30, 2007 2:10 pm

mibi wrote:learn to reduce the transparency on those! 100% is rarely necessary. unless the map is suppose to look like a kids toy.


well, transparency was at about 70% or less on all of the effects, i never make them 100%, but i did tone it down even more.

here is what i changed this round, let me know what should be next:

Changed border width of Regions and Territories
Added another Region (unorganized), with Indian Territories.
Darkened the red in the Unorganized region.
Added Textures to the entire map.
Toned down the "plastic/rubbery" effect

Image
Major Gemineye
 
Posts: 46
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 1:10 am
Medals: 11
Standard Achievement (3) Doubles Achievement (2) Fog of War Achievement (2) Speed Achievement (2) Ratings Achievement (2)

Postby Gozar on Fri Mar 30, 2007 2:15 pm

It has a much nicer look now.

Cheers,

Gozar
User avatar
Lieutenant Gozar
 
Posts: 2577
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 3:15 pm
Location: Nova Scotia (G1)
Medals: 27
Standard Achievement (2) Doubles Achievement (2) Triples Achievement (2) Terminator Achievement (1) Cross-Map Achievement (2)
Ratings Achievement (1) Tournament Achievement (5) Clan Achievement (2) Tournament Contribution (9) General Contribution (1)

Next

Return to Recycling Box

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

Login