Moderator: Community Team
riskllama wrote:Koolbak wins this thread.
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.
dagreatbroomhead wrote:*cough* back on topic...
i think have 2 player games would be good because i think it would create alot of competition and new kinds of tournaments, and epically find out whose the best of two people.
Frigidus wrote:but now that it's become relatively popular it's suffered the usual downturn in coolness.
riskllama wrote:Koolbak wins this thread.
KoolBak wrote:Can't believe it took you so long to post your thots Jay.....excellent idea by the way! You should start a poll.....
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.
haha wrote:if this was an option muties could just set up a 2 person game and let the other one win
KoolBak wrote:OK, we beat this to death in the wrong column previously, and hope to do it again here.
Yeah, I've heard the potential abuse issue with multis but that exissts in 3, 4, etc person games as well.....I simply think it would be great to improve real time action to have the 2 person option like on the board game. There are many times I KNOW one other person is on line and avail, but finding a third or fourth proves to be impossible...and I do not think I have ever seen one of my real time games come to a conclusion REAL TIME.....
Twill / Lack asked for a poll to determine interest....here we go!
Return to Archived Suggestions
Users browsing this forum: No registered users