My gut feeling is that it will happen around 20% of the time, (or whatever the actual prob. is) and I would be willing to put cash on that.

nuh uh :roll:

No not 'nuh uh' at all. The point is that you and the OP are arguing about the randomness of the dice using 3 vrs 3 as the basis of your ...

Moosegun wrote: My gut feeling is that it will happen around 20% of the time, (or whatever the actual prob. is) and I would be willing to put cash on that.

nuh uh

I knew it.

Those bassturds.

We should start a game where only 3 vs 3 attacks are made. Just pile all of your other troops on an out of the way territory and lets see how many times the attacker wins. Regardless of the odds, it should happen.

My gut tells me it will be a rarity far below what the odds suggest success should be ...

The problem with 3 vs 3 and people contentions that the dice are random and even out is that no matter how stupid it is to attack 3 vs 3 with the insane streaks of randomness in this game it should actually happen more than it does.

The op asked if anyone has won a 3 vs 3. Have you?

It's petty and poor gamesmanship.

I'd ignore and leave negative feedback against any player who chose to act in that way.

All I could think about after watching this video was bed.

Sorry, I'm shallow I s'pose.

G'night!