I am complaining that just because [the dice are] random doesn't mean that their good. In fact, that means they might be bad, as chance is very uncontrollable. I would much rather have a fair random numbers algorithm. Just a point for the dice are random argument.

So TNine, and others, what would ...

a MORE fair type of "random" dice.


"Random" is NOT "fair". It's random.

It can be though. You're trying to argue what has already been discussed. Completely friggin' irrelevant and unnecessary post. You can discuss why you'd rather have "more" random dice (which are STILL predetermined ANYWAYS ...

So are you saying that you would like it to produce more 3s and 4s than other numbers? Or are you saying that you would like the attacker's dice to show more 4s, 5s, and 6s? Since we are (hypothetically) controlling the dice we can do this. Also, I just want you to realize that any changes to the ...

So are you saying that you would like it to produce more 3s and 4s than other numbers? Or are you saying that you would like the attacker's dice to show more 4s, 5s, and 6s? Since we are (hypothetically) controlling the dice we can do this. Also, I just want you to realize that any changes to the ...

I'm not saying that the improbable shouldn't be totally impossible. But i am saying that a good random numbers algorithm would be better, as it is more controlled and fair. I'm simply saying this due to the large amounts of totally unfair rolls i've had, but maybe it's just me.
That inherently ...

I'm not saying that the improbable shouldn't be totally impossible. But i am saying that a good random numbers algorithm would be better, as it is more controlled and fair. I'm simply saying this due to the large amounts of totally unfair rolls i've had, but maybe it's just me.
That inherently ...

Timminz wrote:Random DOES NOT equal fair. The sooner you realize this, the sooner you will be able to incorporate the dice into your strategy, and rise through the ranks.

That's exactly what i am saying.
And i don't really care about my rank.

I'm not saying that the improbable shouldn't be totally impossible. But i am saying that a good random numbers algorithm would be better, as it is more controlled and fair. I'm simply saying this due to the large amounts of totally unfair rolls i've had, but maybe it's just me.

In the last five games i've played i've lost four to suiciders who get unnaturally lucky with the dice, no matter what i do.

A "suicider who gets unnaturally lucky with the dice" is just another way of saying "the guy who killed me".
Like that guy who took three armies to my seven, and got a ...

The dice ARE random, lots and lots of analysis has been done on them both internally and by community members. -Conquer Club I am not complaining that the dice aren't random, let's just get that out of the way.
I am complaining that just because there random doesn't mean that their good. In fact ...

The dice ARE random, lots and lots of analysis has been done on them both internally and by community members. -Conquer Club I am not complaining that the dice aren't random, let's just get that out of the way.
I am complaining that just because there random doesn't mean that their good. In fact ...

Great advice. I'll try to use these strategies.

I say niger, because then he has to fort his army, meaning red will most likely hit him because of the fact that he has most of Africa.

delboy01 wrote:I would wait till he gets up to 2000 points again and 'accidentally' reset him again.

Cocky git deserves it.

You have a cruel mind.

Idiot. He gave two acconts the same name and expected to get away?