I get the sense that if I were to give the average player an "average" rating, I'd quickly become very unpopular.

I should probably stay away from ratings.

Gameplay or attitude seems like the best place, but 1 star seems harsh. Maybe 3 stars with an "uncooperative", "rude", or "silent" would be more descriptive.

3 stars? Is this the "average" gameplay I can expect from people here?

If I were you, I wouldn't touch the issue of PMing a person ...

I appreciate the suggestion to put something on the wall. Do people tend to check their wall more often than their PMs?

I think I'm leaning toward Gameplay, under the "enjoyable game" clause, as well as "diplomacy." But if I do it in Gameplay I can't just leave 1 star, because the player's strategy ...

Edit: Responded to Joodoo's post, but the user edited out what I was responding to. D'oh!

The game seems to be #4664737 <CLICKY> .

It's not in the habits of most to leave a player a 1 star rating for not checking the chat, but nevertheless- it's annoying when people refuse to communicate. Some ...

I just finished my first game - and first of all thanks to everyone at Conquer Club for such a great site.

Four player game, classic shapes. I noted that one player was dominating the game and had myself and another player in a rough spot. The number of territories was (Leader): 15, (Other): 12 ...