vodean wrote:and now he seems to be soft-claiming the j-word, so definitely time to kill him vote chapcrap
What? Weakest voting reason ever. Especially since I specifically said I was not a jester...
pancakemix wrote:At any rate, I answered the question, chap. Now will you explain why you'd have killed everywhere?
Because he seemed scummy to me. When I read through, he wasn't adding anything to the discussion and multiple times went a week without posting. And when he did, it was just a one liner. Let's take a look, starting after the joke voting stopped:
everywhere116 wrote:freezie wrote:I also don't see why Edoc intervened on this one...Meta is definitly not a good way to build a real case, but in this particular case..it's somewhat a valid note for day 1. I don't see why everyone jumped for this.
Possibly because of the connections with a game that saf has all knowledge of.
That is a post about Meta. Nothing super signifigant.
everywhere116 wrote:Ginsberg?
everywhere116 wrote:pancakemix wrote:everywhere116 wrote:Ginsberg?
Strike's post autocorrected. I'm just making fun of him.
Ah. I see. Hilary us. Carrie on.
6 days later, he has a couple of posts about strike's chronic auto correct issues. So, instead of commenting on a case, he comments on that. Obviously following along, but no contribution.
everywhere116 wrote:Didn't you just tell us that you're a mason, though?
Questions vodean about Thor mason claim on May 31.
everywhere116 wrote:/ wrote:Well, there was the matter of him and jonty defending each other.
But, this new evidence does seem incriminating, vote saf, any ideas why night may have turned out this way?
Wait, how does saf being targeted by the vig signify him being scum? Can you clarify that for me? I agree he was acting somewhat scummy yesterday, but I don't see how this tips the scales.
He went over two weeks without posting and then posted this. Defends saf early in the case against him.
everywhere116 wrote:/ wrote:Well, since the mod has said the scene is innacurate, I suppose the case of the target being the potential killer isn't really there anymore, Unvote.
All of the scenes used to come with disclaimers that no game related info would be provided. Now people are divining info from the scenes.
So, I guess the only legitimate case remains in clever, then?
everywhere116 wrote:Some7hingCLEVER wrote:i will claim now since i dont know when i will be back on.
i am the FREYR when i am killed my hammer dies along with me and when i die i result a double night meaning two nights follow so mafia would get more kills (i assume thats how it works i was only told it was a double night.)
Your claim isn't without it's doubts. Freyr wasn't associated with a hammer (That's Thor's thing); he was a fertility god that was associated with a magical sword (phallic symbolism definitely intended). Although he is very important and I would expect him to be in the game.
Continues with a more veiled defense saying that CLEVER is the only legitimate case. And then tries to poke holes in CLEVER's claim.
everywhere116 wrote:In that case, Vote saf
Once it's clear that saf is going to be lynched, he goes ahead and votes him.
The whole game he hasn't contributed a thing and he has pretty much been non-committal about most things. He seems to just be trying to fly under the radar instead of remaining active and seeking cases. Add to that, he even tried to defend a mafia member multiple times. He only finally voted when it was evident that it was going to happen anyway.
So, that's why I would have vigged him. Since I'm not going to be able to vig him (I'm saying I'm not a vig, that's not a vig soft claim, vodean), I'll vote him.
unvote vote everywhere