Moderator: Cartographers
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...

jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
Typoes fixed.TaCktiX wrote:The legend still has the "corresponding" and "assaulted" typoes.
meh, it'd be easier to erase your memory.pimpdave wrote:Even if those typos are corrected, I'll never ever be able to play this map with the knowledge that they once existed. KILL THIS MAP! NEVER LET IT SEE THE LIGHT OF DAY!
Nobody can tell you when the map will be in play. However, if you want to speed it up, you can help by participating in the development, offering constructive criticism to the mapmaker, etc. While posts like yours stroke the mapmaker's ego, posts that offer legitimate feedback and/or criticism are a hundred times more valuable to him. Just saying...Seamus76 wrote:This is a great map, seriously when will this be available for play? Should skip the graphics workshop as well.

Natty do you have any suggestions? I think the gameplay is pretty much where I want it. I've been waiting for some new suggestions but the lack there of is kind of telling me that it's time for a sticky. At the very least it'll draw more peoples attention and might pull out a few last minute changes before this goes in graphics.natty_dread wrote:Nobody can tell you when the map will be in play. However, if you want to speed it up, you can help by participating in the development, offering constructive criticism to the mapmaker, etc. While posts like yours stroke the mapmaker's ego, posts that offer legitimate feedback and/or criticism are a hundred times more valuable to him. Just saying...Seamus76 wrote:This is a great map, seriously when will this be available for play? Should skip the graphics workshop as well.

Yes. Each player will start with at least 1 European power, as well as a relatively random host of African territories. I'll probably have to code in bonus blocks like on Thyseneal, just to make sure everyone has a fair start.natty_dread wrote:Will you be coding the european powers as starting positions? If so, I think you could code them so that each player only gets one.

Hooray! I'm so glad to hear that you'll be a part of this. I look forward to working with you again.ender516 wrote:I have been keeping up on this map since about page 4, until this evening. TBK has asked me to pitch in on the XML and I look forward to it, as I believe this map has some very interesting gameplay. Getting those starting positions worked out will no doubt be a challenge. I guess I will have to fire up the old bonus calculators and see what falls out.
I think we are agreeing. If you mean that each player will start with more than one territory but only one European power then yes we are agreeing. Each player only should on;y start with 1 European power even in a 1 v 1.natty_dread wrote:No I mean code them so that each player only gets one. It would make sense thematically - each starts with one country.
Most excellent I'll have to figure those out in the next couple of days with Ender. I'll be out until Sunday though. Also what were the golden start numbers? like in the 60-70 range?MarshalNey wrote:I'll give this a nudge to a sticky, but before this gets stamped it will require an updated first post. The gameplay starting positions and deployment should be there, for instance, along with bonus values if possible.
-- Marshal Ney
You can find them here.The Bison King wrote:Most excellent I'll have to figure those out in the next couple of days with Ender. I'll be out until Sunday though. Also what were the golden start numbers? like in the 60-70 range?
Yes, a necessary change, it's a shame but I was rather fond of B.S.P.S. I see that what started as Djibouti, and then became B. S. () (British Somaliland, I presume) has been turned over to the Ottomans as a landing point named O. S. I presume that means we want to call it Ottoman Somaliland, a term slightly out of date by 1914, but acceptable I think for the sake of gameplay.
Please explain that one for me. I've never heard that one and I'm curious.P.P.S Some of the bonus region names seem a bit anachronistic. I would suggest the following changes:
Tanzania -> Tanganyika
Those are just too long to fit, at the moment, if some space opens up I'll consider changing them.Angola -> Portuguese West Africa
Mozambique -> Portuguese East Africa
Namibia -> German South-West Africa
I think that's how I had it originally.Cameroon -> Kamerun [it was a German colony, so the German spelling seems appropriate]
Maybe we'll see about that. Yellow just seems to "happy" for Germany. All of the colors are bound to change so this problem will probably disappear at the hands of an alternative solution later on.Also, when the shading goes onto Germany and Portugal, I find their colours hard to distinguish. I guess it's because Portugal is a small area and most of its yellowness is shaded over. The distinction is clear in the mini-maps, but on the main map, I just don't see the colour connection between Portugal and its colonies. I suggest swapping the colours of Germany and Portugal. That way, in Europe, there will be a larger yellow area which will be more clearly yellow, while the brown will be shaded and still brown.
A bit pet peevish but I have no problem with those changes, you might have to remind me later on though.I have never been really comfortable with continents and territories sharing names. It is legal, but just seems like something that might be confusing at some point. So, I would like to suggest using "Spanish Sahara" for the bonus zone in place of "Spanish Morocco", and "Anatolia" in place of "Ottoman" (the European homeland).

I don't know whether or not that was the legit name of the territory back then, but I do know that there's a lake that borders Tanzania called, Lake Tanganyika:The Bison King wrote:Please explain that one for me. I've never heard that one and I'm curious.P.P.S Some of the bonus region names seem a bit anachronistic. I would suggest the following changes:
Tanzania -> Tanganyika

that's right. That's actually the lake featured in the map. I'm not sure it should be the region name though.Victor Sullivan wrote:I don't know whether or not that was the legit name of the territory back then, but I do know that there's a lake that borders Tanzania called, Lake Tanganyika:The Bison King wrote:Please explain that one for me. I've never heard that one and I'm curious.P.P.S Some of the bonus region names seem a bit anachronistic. I would suggest the following changes:
Tanzania -> Tanganyika
-Sully