Moderator: Community Team
jennifermarie wrote:This has been suggested a multitude of times...no matter what system we use, people will become unhappy with it.
have a nice day!
jennifermarie
There is, you can only lose 100 in any game. I'd say that's a pretty good cut off.killthejoe wrote:There's gotta be a new way to do the calculations that narrows the margin of how much you can lose against lower ranked players,
BaldAdonis wrote:There is, you can only lose 100 in any game. I'd say that's a pretty good cut off.killthejoe wrote:There's gotta be a new way to do the calculations that narrows the margin of how much you can lose against lower ranked players,
amazzony wrote:Herakilla wrote:i was your rank a couple days ago then i lost to some with 600 points XD but i didnt cry about it
Who was that pointed at?
Mentos- wrote:I definitely think a change to the score calculations would be good to make point loss/gain not as extreme when there are low and high ranks in the game...
Maybe something like (loser's score)/(winner's score)*10 + 10
Herakilla wrote:amazzony wrote:Herakilla wrote:i was your rank a couple days ago then i lost to some with 600 points XD but i didnt cry about it
Who was that pointed at?
at you, you are (or were at the time of my post i didnt bother looking again) a sarge first class and so was i
amazzony wrote:Herakilla wrote:amazzony wrote:Herakilla wrote:i was your rank a couple days ago then i lost to some with 600 points XD but i didnt cry about it
Who was that pointed at?
at you, you are (or were at the time of my post i didnt bother looking again) a sarge first class and so was i
I never ever cry about losing points. Either learn to read or... yeah, learn to read
And now, on-topic. As mentioned a lot before - if you lose to a cook then you deserve itIf I lose to a cook then he either had better strategy than I had or had better luck. Either way it's a fair win as both elements are part of this game.
Return to Archived Suggestions
Users browsing this forum: No registered users