aage wrote:WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:Aage Streaker - Thoughts? Madmitch is confusing things for me.
Mitch is a wild card, I'm not interested in lynching him right away because of that. In HP mafia he never removed his vote on day 1 without immediately re-voting, so that kind of speaks for him, but the problem with Mitch is that he has no clear tell because his town play is also very scummy.
The interactions between Mitch and others are more interesting though. I'm not sure how to read Dakky's vote right now. Combined with his provoking remarks towards Mitch, his vote on Mitch is a self fulfilling prophecy. I'm really not liking that, it's the easiest of easy votes. If Dakky never played with Mitch and hasn't realised that this is just what Mitch does, I could understand, but Dakky himself said he played with Mitch before - in fact, the entire interaction between them seems based on Dakky's reference to this. He voted Mitch in the full expectation that Mitch would vote back, and when Mitch does vote, Dakky says it's a scum tell. I really want Dakky to explain this logic. Why is it scummy that Mitch does something you predicted he'd do?
@Streaker, only 7 players in the game, small game like this it's easy to replace. If people aren't posting after a while but aren't being replaced, sure we can hang them because that's scummy. At the moment I don't think inactivity is any indication of scumminess though, we're way too early in the game.
Here's my comments on Mitch's dodgy voting behaviour, by the way. It's a response to your post, and you responded to this post.
I'm avoiding cases right now because everyone seems to be vote / trigger happy. I don't want to make hasty decisions because they are usually bad decisions. You ask me to hammer Dazza - what is the case on Dazza based on again? Inactivity. That's all. He posted once, and therefore apparently three guys think he is mafia (why else vote him), although I'm not sure all those who vote Dazza actually believe this. Hotshot voted Dazza to "put pressure on him", as an incentive to post. Mitch is, as you said, suffering from dodgy voting behaviour and he seems to be voting Dazza (a) because Dakky did, and (b) because Dazza isn't posting. I'll repeat, I do not at all believe that this is a valid case against him. Wait for the prod to resolve before you kill off absentees.
I don't like how we're now suddenly on opposite sides of the spectrum, Wing. You're antagonising me. You called me Dakky's scumbuddy but fail to give arguments. You claimed all actual thought process is coming from you, which tells me you don't think I've spoken out about my reads, which I have. Now you ask me to hammer a case which (a) you're not even voting and (b) is being voted by your top picks for werewolf and mafia. Any reason why I shouldn't OMGUS you right now?
[/quote]
