Anarkistsdream wrote:edocsil wrote:Anarkistsdream wrote:edocsil wrote:Blow me. You're in no danger of being lynched.
As flores said, there is just no case. Admit that its a random lynch at best or piss off, I'm not impressed.
I mean seriously. I expected way too much here I guess.
....
Are you on the rag? It's a game, it's day one, and you made an ass out of yourself attacking me with that vote... I waited until now to vote because, so far, you are the scummiest person in the game. You have no other ideas but to tell me to blow you? Get over yourself, Edoc... Seriously.
What, these a reason 3 out of 18 people have picked this up. All you got is an OMGUS and vote you didn't like, but that I was able to decently rationalize.
You have it right there, the only reason I am getting voted is that I'm an ass. Woopie, don't expect me to respect this, or to take it seriously.
And if I viewed this as typical, maybe I wouldn't have voted you. But a temper tantrum gets us nowhere except up your ass. Deal with it and make wellthough out arguments. Name calling with no reason earns my vote
Fastposted with abetter post. What is your prob, Edoc...? You usually are not like this... Septic shock? Try removing the first tampon before ramming the next one in.
Unvote to get Newguys panties out of a twist. I note that you don't care about the 2-3 other votes lying around.
Insults aside Anark, when am I not a dick to stupid actions? I mad my arguments, and you three don't care. I'll do it again.
A: The vote you placed made no sense to me. I did not understand it, and that is the EXACT same reason that you three are voting me now. You do not understand the WHY of my vote. I voted you for your action, this forces an explanation from you. Feel free to disagree if it was vote worthy, but that was the exact action and reaction that I intended, and that I provoked. It promotes discussion, ends the joke phase, and gives us actual content that we can later discuss.
THIS INCIDATES PROTOWN BEHAVIORB: You clarified it was a jest, and that should of been the end of it. I would expect there to be discussion afterwards, but not focused around hanging you provide that your reasoning was sound.
C: Jonty and Ker jump me for it. I don't get why. (Note: hypocrisy here, their argument, the act that an invalid vote is scummy, is the same as mine. Their argument is entirely self defeating, because it validates my primary vote.) The vote wasn't unreasonable. (Can someone back me up on this here, or does everyone just want to watch us belittle each-other?)
D: I explain why I voted, and it's insisted by you three that it was so scummy, and that I didn't unvote was a surefire scum tell. This simply stupid opinion runs counter to all logic (referencing my lack of unvote). There are MANY other votes on the field ATM, that have far less, or similar amounts of thought behind them than mine. DO NOT pretend that this part of your argument is totally, utterly, and completely invalid.
There is a VC, page 12, edited to present
Votey County:
virus90 - 1 (Flores)
gregwolf121 - 3 (TFO)
Commander9 - 3 (HotShot, ga7, Saf5)
HotShot53 - 1 (epic pie)
JamesKer1 - 1 (rish)
ga7 - 1 (TWO)
Flores - 1 (Nark)
Edoc'sil - 3 (James, jonty Anark)
So there, there is my argument. Cut the period jokes and deal with that if you can Anark.