natty dread wrote:I'm going to start my own site and name it General Command.
Unfortunately, after a bit of discussion, behind the scenes, with the site admins, it has been brought to my attention that the theme of a larger world map has been reserved for future use, for this reason "the site" can't give to you the approval for a map of that type.
If you have problem with this decision, feel free to send a PM directly to AndyDufresne.
The Bison King wrote:Is he serious?
DiM wrote:general? pff, go for field marshal. it's higher ranked.
also you need to fit this in the soon to be new sizes of 500*500 for large and 350*350 for small.
maybe if you play nice you'll be allowed a supersize of 600*600.
DiM wrote:The Bison King wrote:Is he serious?
i would be too if somebody told me:
"hey nice map you have there bud. too bad you wasted your time with it cause we decided we're gonna get your idea and make a behind the stage map so yours is not allowed"
i'm also assuming i'm no longer allowed to pursue my world 3.0 map.
Natty Dread wrote:Now guys, can we PLEASE stop doing this? This whole thing of "if I don't get my way I'll just quit working on this!"
The Bison King wrote:Whatever happened to Map making is a privilege not a right?
DiM wrote:The Bison King wrote:Whatever happened to Map making is a privilege not a right?
so if lackattack came to you and told you to abandon your colonial africa because he's planning on letting somebody make a colonial africa map behind the scenes sometime in the future, would you simply say: "yes sir, your wish is my command" and then abandon your work?
The Bison King wrote:Yeah, but is it that surprising that the site lay claim to the basic world map?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users