You, Sir, are FULL OF SHIT and clearly do not understand the point about significant digits. You bent the definition of half a century to keep from admitting your error. And now you want to claim something invalid, because you do not understand the concept that I bring up about significant digits (aka significant figures). To use a birthday to make your false point shows the extent of your ignorance of the topic. A birthday is a precise date for MOST of us in this modern age. Apparently, that may NOT be true in your case, based on your lack of comprehension of the topic I raised.
I will not read a BOOK that is from one perspective; it is another attempt to denigrate Trump by smearing those around him. NOTHING NEW there. Trump is doing a fine job of demeaning his own character himself and needs NO help to do so. Those who do not like Trump already see and read it in the news almost daily. Hillary is doing so, too, but not as frequently. AND there is already sufficient polarization and reading that book does not change any of that for me.
Barr already told Trump there was no evidence of widespread election fraud before he resigned. That is one big reason for his resignation. Read the BOOK by him, if you dare.
Barr resigned before Jan. 6, 2021. That is one convenient fact you omitted.
On December 14, 2020, Trump announced via Twitter that Barr would be resigning from his post as attorney general, effective December 23.[275] Barr further confirmed his resignation in a letter to Trump on the same day
As for Flynn, he was trapped by the FBI, based on what I know.
btw: That is ONE book, that I will NOT bother to read, because there is NO VALUE TO IT FOR ME. Why read it when
1) I got you to FINALLY give me a 5 minute synopsis, and that
2) clearly shows your bias.
3) I need NOT waste my money or my time on the book.
4) Rather than expect others to read the book by
Barr, I already gave the courtesy of giving you a synopsis (summary).
5) You would not do the same for me until I challenged your previously unsubstantiated claims.
Further:
6) Two individuals intimately involved in a situation can look at its set of circumstances and draw two different conclusions, based on biases and perspectives.
7)
Barr's role under Trump is still in Flux; i.e., has not been definitively determined.
8 ) The same cannot be said about Mitchell. Tell me one person who NOW defends John Mitchell within 50 years of his resignation as AG to run CREEP.
9) And your math is still wrong.
10) Trump is still an egotist.
11) Trump is still a JERK and still bombastic.
12) You are still wrong.
