superbowl

[UCAbears]

ex. what division can you be 8-8 in and go to the playoffs? the NFC west....

Nope, that'd be the NFC East champ

what the division can include the Packers AND the Lions? the NFC North....

What's so bad about the Packers? They were 8-8

what division can have the Super Bowl Favorites (panthers) go on a downward spiral? the NFC south....

They've been superbowl favorites the last 3 years. That's more of a team issue than a conference issue.

what division can have 3 teams in the playoffs, yet none of them have more than 10 wins? The NFC East....

All those teams have the worst fans anyways.

it's a fact, the AFC is far superior than the NFC

The NFC was the original NFL, before they were invited the AFL into our league.

The AFC has the Cleveland Browns and the Oakland Raiders...nuff said

Superbowl wins:
NFC 21
AFC 19

NFC= better

well said brothern, well said

[Evil Semp]

hey Gizzle you forgot one question.

Which division has the team that choked in the playoff that P Gizzle likes so much. NFC West.


Go BEARS

might i start with the "world's greatest defense" giving up 24 points? that's not so great is it? might i also mention that the only reason we lost was because Matt "im a retard" Hasselbeck decided that holding on to the ball would have been better than throwing it away, puttin the hawks outside of FG territory. out play calling (as usual) sucked due to holmgren's inability to realize that Alexander can only run inside and does much better that way....


just be glad ur in the Super Bowl, you'll be the butt of many jokes, much like i was, after it.......

I don't think anyone has called them the worlds greatest defence for quite awhile.

The first time the Bears played the SeaChicks you said Alexander would have made a difference. He didn't. Blame it on whom ever you want.

I am very happy the Bears are in the Super Bowl But the difference between the two of us is I won't make excuses if the Colts win.

[Lord Canti]

Dan Marino, Jim Kelly,... Peyton Manning

[P Gizzle]

ex. what division can you be 8-8 in and go to the playoffs? the NFC west....

Nope, that'd be the NFC East champ

That would be the Seahawks a couple years ago

what the division can include the Packers AND the Lions? the NFC North....

What's so bad about the Packers? They were 8-8

they've always sucked

what division can have the Super Bowl Favorites (panthers) go on a downward spiral? the NFC south....

They've been superbowl favorites the last 3 years. That's more of a team issue than a conference issue.

has the AFC done that?

what division can have 3 teams in the playoffs, yet none of them have more than 10 wins? The NFC East....

All those teams have the worst fans anyways.

what's ur point?

it's a fact, the AFC is far superior than the NFC

The NFC was the original NFL, before they were invited the AFL into our league.

The AFC has the Cleveland Browns and the Oakland Raiders...nuff said

Superbowl wins:
NFC 21
AFC 19

NFC= better

ok, so what? the NL was before the AL in baseball...the AL is better....the NFC has the lions, cards, hawks...would you like me to go on....

look RECENTLY at SB wins.....

AFC=loads better[/quote]

[millej11]

That would be the Seahawks a couple years ago

And 20 other teams in both conferences through out history.

what the division can include the Packers AND the Lions? the NFC North....

What's so bad about the Packers? They were 8-8

they've always sucked

3 superbowl wins
1 loosing season in the last 16 years
One of the greatest franchises in NFL history
yeah...they've always sucked

what division can have the Super Bowl Favorites (panthers) go on a downward spiral? the NFC south....

They've been superbowl favorites the last 3 years. That's more of a team issue than a conference issue.

has the AFC done that?

How about the colts the last 4 years? Everyone knew by midseason that the panthers were't as great as they appear on paper. The colts on the other hand go undefeated 3/4 of the season, and the media's saying 16-0, but come playoff time, it's a blowout

it's a fact, the AFC is far superior than the NFC

The NFC was the original NFL, before they were invited the AFL into our league.

The AFC has the Cleveland Browns and the Oakland Raiders...nuff said

Superbowl wins:
NFC 21
AFC 19

NFC= better

ok, so what? the NL was before the AL in baseball...the AL is better....the NFC has the lions, cards, hawks...would you like me to go on....

look RECENTLY at SB wins.....

I'm looking at recent SB wins, and sure, the last 10 years it's been 7-3, AFC. But leading up to that was a 13 year streak of NFC superbowl champs.

[P Gizzle]

hey Gizzle you forgot one question.

Which division has the team that choked in the playoff that P Gizzle likes so much. NFC West.


Go BEARS

might i start with the "world's greatest defense" giving up 24 points? that's not so great is it? might i also mention that the only reason we lost was because Matt "im a retard" Hasselbeck decided that holding on to the ball would have been better than throwing it away, puttin the hawks outside of FG territory. out play calling (as usual) sucked due to holmgren's inability to realize that Alexander can only run inside and does much better that way....


just be glad ur in the Super Bowl, you'll be the butt of many jokes, much like i was, after it.......

I don't think anyone has called them the worlds greatest defence for quite awhile.

The first time the Bears played the SeaChicks you said Alexander would have made a difference. He didn't. Blame it on whom ever you want.

I am very happy the Bears are in the Super Bowl But the difference between the two of us is I won't make excuses if the Colts win.

weren't you saying that earlier this year. "oh our defense is so good noone can stop us!"


and Alexander made ALL the difference....are we watching the same game


i call it BS, you call it an excuse....tomato, tomahto, right?

[millej11]

And mind you, 8-8 is a hell of a lot better than a 9-7 team <cough> seahawks <cough> who play in the worst division in the NFL.

[Evil Semp]

hey Gizzle you forgot one question.

Which division has the team that choked in the playoff that P Gizzle likes so much. NFC West.


Go BEARS

might i start with the "world's greatest defense" giving up 24 points? that's not so great is it? might i also mention that the only reason we lost was because Matt "im a retard" Hasselbeck decided that holding on to the ball would have been better than throwing it away, puttin the hawks outside of FG territory. out play calling (as usual) sucked due to holmgren's inability to realize that Alexander can only run inside and does much better that way....


just be glad ur in the Super Bowl, you'll be the butt of many jokes, much like i was, after it.......

I don't think anyone has called them the worlds greatest defence for quite awhile.

The first time the Bears played the SeaChicks you said Alexander would have made a difference. He didn't. Blame it on whom ever you want.

I am very happy the Bears are in the Super Bowl But the difference between the two of us is I won't make excuses if the Colts win.

weren't you saying that earlier this year. "oh our defense is so good noone can stop us!"


and Alexander made ALL the difference....are we watching the same game


i call it BS, you call it an excuse....tomato, tomahto, right?

A loss is a loss. The score might have been closer but the end result was the same.

[UselessTriviaMan]

Man, P Gizzle just really hates dem Bears doesn't he?

You get right down to it, there's really only one primary reason why the Bears' defense is giving up more yardage and points than they did earlier in the year. Tommie Harris got sidelined for the rest of the season with a hamstring injury in Week 12. While his replacement Alfonso Boone has done an adequate job for the most part, Harris was a juggernaut who consistently required double coverage to be stopped at all (and he still managed to get in 5 sacks and a fumble recovery). With Harris in the mix, the defensive front four could consistently collapse the pocket and flush out or even sack a QB, leaving seven guys back in pass coverage.

If Harris were able to play against the Colts, it'd be a much different game. Regardless, it's going to be one helluva game, and I think it's going to be a close contest.

[sfhbballnut]

P Gizzle the seahawks are not that bad, give it up. And yes the NFC has some bad teams but my point was they have more good teams that the AFC and the beat each other up. The AFC has a few great teams that dominate the bad ones. so they're about even overall

[P Gizzle]

P Gizzle the seahawks are not that bad, give it up. And yes the NFC has some bad teams but my point was they have more good teams that the AFC and the beat each other up. The AFC has a few great teams that dominate the bad ones. so they're about even overall

tell that to Semp



i disagree, though....

the AFC has.....Chargers, Pats, Colts, Bengals (when they aren't in trouble), Ravens....

The NFC has.....Bears.........


End O' Story

[Caleb the Cruel]

Although I have rooted for the Colts in the past, the Bears will win the Super Bowl, but not by much. It'll be an exciting game.

[P Gizzle]

hey Gizzle you forgot one question.

Which division has the team that choked in the playoff that P Gizzle likes so much. NFC West.


Go BEARS

might i start with the "world's greatest defense" giving up 24 points? that's not so great is it? might i also mention that the only reason we lost was because Matt "im a retard" Hasselbeck decided that holding on to the ball would have been better than throwing it away, puttin the hawks outside of FG territory. out play calling (as usual) sucked due to holmgren's inability to realize that Alexander can only run inside and does much better that way....


just be glad ur in the Super Bowl, you'll be the butt of many jokes, much like i was, after it.......

I don't think anyone has called them the worlds greatest defence for quite awhile.

The first time the Bears played the SeaChicks you said Alexander would have made a difference. He didn't. Blame it on whom ever you want.

I am very happy the Bears are in the Super Bowl But the difference between the two of us is I won't make excuses if the Colts win.

weren't you saying that earlier this year. "oh our defense is so good noone can stop us!"


and Alexander made ALL the difference....are we watching the same game


i call it BS, you call it an excuse....tomato, tomahto, right?

A loss is a loss. The score might have been closer but the end result was the same.

really? if the roethlisberger is not a td, then it is 14-10.....add that with the "pushing off" then, it is now 17-14, no?


and i'd like to see the packers without Favre, and Green, and then see if they're 9-7.....

[millej11]

and i'd like to see the packers without Favre, and Green, and then see if they're 9-7.....

ooookaaaaay..... I'm not sure where you're going with that one, but I know it was directed at me.

How about we take Alexander and Tutapu from the hawks, and lets see how they fair.

[P Gizzle]

and i'd like to see the packers without Favre, and Green, and then see if they're 9-7.....

ooookaaaaay..... I'm not sure where you're going with that one, but I know it was directed at me.

How about we take Alexander and Tutapu from the hawks, and lets see how they fair.

ok, we took Alexander and Hasselbeck....they were 9-7....now get hurt favre and green, i wanna see the packers fail, as usual

[millej11]

and i'd like to see the packers without Favre, and Green, and then see if they're 9-7.....

ooookaaaaay..... I'm not sure where you're going with that one, but I know it was directed at me.

How about we take Alexander and Tutapu from the hawks, and lets see how they fair.

ok, we took Alexander and Hasselbeck....they were 9-7....now get hurt favre and green, i wanna see the packers fail, as usual

For someone to say the phrase, "as usual", there needs to be a trend. And since the packers have the best record in the NFL since 1993, with one losing season during that period and 2 superbowls, I fail to see a trend. But maybe that's just me.

Anyone here other than me think that PeeGuzzle is just flaming others because he can't back up his own side?

[P Gizzle]

and i'd like to see the packers without Favre, and Green, and then see if they're 9-7.....

ooookaaaaay..... I'm not sure where you're going with that one, but I know it was directed at me.

How about we take Alexander and Tutapu from the hawks, and lets see how they fair.

ok, we took Alexander and Hasselbeck....they were 9-7....now get hurt favre and green, i wanna see the packers fail, as usual

For someone to say the phrase, "as usual", there needs to be a trend. And since the packers have the best record in the NFL since 1993, with one losing season during that period and 2 superbowls, I fail to see a trend. But maybe that's just me.

Anyone here other than me think that PeeGuzzle is just flaming others because he can't back up his own side?

how well would you do, if you didnt have 2 of the best players on ur team, not to mention a hurt secondary, which ALREADY sucks something awful

[millej11]

All I can say is holmgren. He's been known to bring out the best in everyone.

[P Gizzle]

OMFG, you weren't kidding?!?

[millej11]

hey, he didn't do half bad in Green Bay

[P Gizzle]

haven't watched a seattle game yet, huh?

[millej11]

he can't be that bad. After all, he did get you guys to the superbowl. Tends to make odd decisions every once in a while though. Like completely failing to stop the run in SB XXXII against the broncos

[P Gizzle]

he can't be that bad. After all, he did get you guys to the superbowl. Tends to make odd decisions every once in a while though. Like completely failing to stop the run in SB XXXII against the broncos

EVERY ONCE IN A WHILE!! try every play, or two....


ok, in the bears game, he decided that Shaun Alexander was only gonna run outside....it so happens that when he runs outside we lose 3-6 yds. when he runs inside, we gain at least 10 yards!! WTF!

[millej11]

Well if a Seahawks fan says he sucks, than I guess I can't disagree with you.

[P Gizzle]

thank you...


let's agree to disagree about the conferences, mmkay?