Grapes and Sex

hecter · Post by **hecter** » Mon Mar 05, 2007 9:19 pm

*holds Vincent*

Vincent M · Post by **Vincent M** » Mon Mar 05, 2007 9:23 pm

thank you hecter i think it is over

hecter · Post by **hecter** » Mon Mar 05, 2007 9:24 pm

phew.

adam3b58 · Post by **adam3b58** » Mon Mar 05, 2007 9:29 pm

he only got as far as...

G - arnish
R - estaurant
A - sian
P - rince
E - cononmy book
S- tamp

s.xkitten · Post by **s.xkitten** » Mon Mar 05, 2007 9:30 pm

and he left out "and"

hecter · Post by **hecter** » Mon Mar 05, 2007 9:31 pm

Here.

adam3b58 · Post by **adam3b58** » Mon Mar 05, 2007 9:31 pm

s.xkitten wrote:and he left out "and"

well, no

it's "grapeS and sex" grapes is plural.. but you might have been right if you had continued that thought all the way to "and he left out "and sex"

Vincent M · Post by **Vincent M** » Mon Mar 05, 2007 9:31 pm

hecter wrote:Here.

*takes 2 passes out*

hecter · Post by **hecter** » Mon Mar 05, 2007 9:32 pm

hecter · Post by **hecter** » Mon Mar 05, 2007 9:32 pm

Now we are done. Minus the s in grapes of course.

adam3b58 · Post by **adam3b58** » Mon Mar 05, 2007 9:36 pm

hecter wrote:Now we are done. Minus the s in grapes of course.

the stamp was the that 's'

hecter · Post by **hecter** » Mon Mar 05, 2007 9:38 pm

Okay, then we are done.
We got;

G-arnish
R-estaraunt
A-sian
P-rince
E-conomy book
S-tamp

S-pam
E-x Lax
X-indi

Colaalone · Post by **Colaalone** » Mon Mar 05, 2007 9:39 pm

wtf... it was just random pictures
i was never spelling it lol

hecter · Post by **hecter** » Mon Mar 05, 2007 9:40 pm

To bad lol

Colaalone · Post by **Colaalone** » Mon Mar 05, 2007 9:41 pm

adam3b58 · Post by **adam3b58** » Mon Mar 05, 2007 9:41 pm

Colaalone wrote:wtf... it was just random pictures
i was never spelling it lol

never underestimate the ingenuity of fools

hecter · Post by **hecter** » Mon Mar 05, 2007 9:42 pm

Maybe you should leave out the sex part…

UCAbears · Post by **UCAbears** » Mon Mar 05, 2007 9:42 pm

yess. dont you EVER!

Colaalone · Post by **Colaalone** » Mon Mar 05, 2007 9:42 pm

hecter · Post by **hecter** » Mon Mar 05, 2007 9:43 pm

I have one of those leather things that's on the dummy

It drives Cynthia crazy

Colaalone · Post by **Colaalone** » Mon Mar 05, 2007 9:44 pm

hecter · Post by **hecter** » Mon Mar 05, 2007 9:44 pm

hecter wrote:I have one of those leather things that's on the dummy It drives Cynthia crazy

Backglass · Post by **Backglass** » Mon Mar 05, 2007 9:51 pm

Colaalone · Post by **Colaalone** » Mon Mar 05, 2007 9:53 pm

unriggable · Post by **unriggable** » Mon Mar 05, 2007 10:27 pm

From the onion:

This is not the first time a McDonald's character has stirred controversy for its violent nature. In 1982, the company introduced "Shakes McJunkie," an emaciated addict who robbed characters of their possessions, which he then sold to buy McDonald's shakes. He was later reworked as "The Machead," a homeless, wild-eyed Big Mac addict who turned to panhandling and gay prostitution as a means of supporting his severe burger habit.

The Hammurderer is quickly becoming regarded as the worst-received advertising mascot since Kool-Aid's 1989 discontinuation of "The Grapist," a huge purple monster who sodomizes thirsty children.