Biden fakes downing a Balloon in Alaska!!!

[jonesthecurl]

Why would the Chinese need a spy balloon when all they have to do is ask Biden, who is supposedly on their payroll?

[mookiemcgee]

Winning!

[Maxleod]

Why would the Chinese need a spy balloon when all they have to do is ask Biden, who is supposedly on their payroll?

No, it's my understanding that it's Biden's son, and he's on Russia's payroll, not China (so I heard on CC).

[HitRed]

Dr. Strange Love

[mookiemcgee]

New close up image of the ballon has been released, turns out it's just doordash

[ConfederateSS]

------Pew!Pew!!.... Scratch on Commie Pinko Balloon... Surfside Beach,S.C...2:38pm est time...7 days to late...As it flew all over top nuclear sites....Air Bases...etc...From one end of The USA to the other...But yay ...It desends to Earth...With a 1,000 holes in it.... Ironic, Just like Biden's re-election ...... ConfederateSS.out!(The Blue and Silver Rebellion)...

[ConfederateSS]

Why would the Chinese need a spy balloon when all they have to do is ask Biden, who is supposedly on their payroll?

----------Why do hookers let Hunter , put it in their ass???....The Bidens have made America, China's hooker...... ConfederateSS.out!(The Blue and Silver Rebellion)...

[HitRed]

Scratch one balloon. Will Brazil follow suit?

[bigtoughralf]

It may be accidental but it may still be a threat to a sovereign state.

It's a blow up balloon.

more like ralf's blow-up doll that escaped

saxi +1

jp's in support of any post that gives him a chance to think about me with an erection

[jusplay4fun]

Finally, US shoots down Chinese balloon. CPC still say it was a weather balloon. Let’s see what analysis of it shows:

[HitRed]

Allowing it to cross is a lack of order.

[saxitoxin]

It may be accidental but it may still be a threat to a sovereign state.

It's a blow up balloon.

more like ralf's blow-up doll that escaped

saxi +1

jp's in support of any post that gives him a chance to think about me with an erection

wouldn't you have the opposite of an erection if your blow-up doll escaped

[Dukasaur]

Allowing it to cross is a lack of order.

No, it's a sign of basic restraint. Using power wisely is the opposite of using it recklessly. Just because you can shoot anything that moves, doesn't mean you should.

[mookiemcgee]

Yet another image of the balloon has emerged

[jimboston]

Yet another image of the balloon has emerged

If someone had photoshop skilz and repainted Winnie to look like a Panda…

[HitRed]

Allowing it to cross is a lack of order.

No, it's a sign of basic restraint. Using power wisely is the opposite of using it recklessly. Just because you can shoot anything that moves, doesn't mean you should.

He did shot something that moved.

[saxitoxin]

Allowing it to cross is a lack of order.

No, it's a sign of basic restraint. Using power wisely is the opposite of using it recklessly. Just because you can shoot anything that moves, doesn't mean you should.

Looks like the "Joe Biden Warrior Monk" narrative just went the way of the "Joe Biden Wise Elder Statesman" narrative.

[HitRed]

[saxitoxin]

Biden just spent $700,000 to launch an AAM against a weather balloon when he could have (a) let it harmlessly float off, or, (b) fired four rounds of F35 30mm cannon ammo at it for about $500.

But he needed the air intercept for TV. Needed to swing that dick to whip the public up into war hysteria. The wise warrior monk at work.

[Dukasaur]

Allowing it to cross is a lack of order.

No, it's a sign of basic restraint. Using power wisely is the opposite of using it recklessly. Just because you can shoot anything that moves, doesn't mean you should.

He did shot something that moved.

Yes, after due consideration of the possibilities, as it should be. Not at the first impulse, as the hotheads would have preferred.

[HitRed]

Allowing it to cross is a lack of order.

No, it's a sign of basic restraint. Using power wisely is the opposite of using it recklessly. Just because you can shoot anything that moves, doesn't mean you should.

He did shot something that moved.

Yes, after due consideration of the possibilities, as it should be. Not at the first impulse, as the hotheads would have preferred.

If it was threat enough to shoot down in the Atlantic it should have been dropped in the Pacific.

[jusplay4fun]

Allowing it to cross is a lack of order.

No, it's a sign of basic restraint. Using power wisely is the opposite of using it recklessly. Just because you can shoot anything that moves, doesn't mean you should.

He did shot something that moved.

Yes, after due consideration of the possibilities, as it should be. Not at the first impulse, as the hotheads would have preferred.

If it was threat enough to shoot down in the Atlantic it should have been dropped in the Pacific.

Two key points, it seems to me, is when did we know for sure it belonged to the Chinese and when did we get a clear idea of its likely purpose (weather, military, espionage or surveillance, or other). If surveillance, why use a balloon when satellites would be the "better" way? My understanding that is that it drifted over Canada before getting to Montana. What did the Canadiens know? And when did they understand what it is?

[mookiemcgee]

Republican thought leader says:











less than 24 hours later:






Oops!

[HitRed]

So why did we shot it down then?

[HitRed]

Is the Cartels sending fentanyl across the southern boarder an unacceptable violation of U.S. sovereignty? How about human smuggling or sex trafficking?