Moderator: Community Team
What are you TALKING about? You didn't even read it AT ALL, 'cause that's the utter entire opposite of what I said ENTIRELY TOTALLY. I bagged me a goof, three points!D.IsleRealBrown wrote: Ok, I read it all, my retort....
That's even more absurd, Oceania should get the extra bonus?
What are you smokin, and give me some.
You're only looking at two factors to form your opinion. # of countries and # of borders.Master Bush wrote:Then why not only give Oceania 1 bonus then. Cause S. America is harder to hold then Oceania, so they shouldn't give the same bonus.
goofbagger.ZawBanjito wrote:What are you TALKING about? You didn't even read it AT ALL, 'cause that's the utter entire opposite of what I said ENTIRELY TOTALLY. I bagged me a goof, three points!D.IsleRealBrown wrote: Ok, I read it all, my retort....
That's even more absurd, Oceania should get the extra bonus?
What are you smokin, and give me some.
Someone suggested S. America should get three and/or Australia one bonus army instead of two, and I worked through what I thought were the reasoning why NEITHER SHOULD CHANGE.
From now on I'm talking in FORUMESE - "thats the gayest idea ever l0l!!!1"
I ABANDON FOREVER SERIOUS DISCUSSION GOODBYE!