Moderator: Community Team
You say that the unions don't pay you, and that's mostly true. Yet the unions DO have a hand in how much you are paid, as well as your benefits. So to pretend that the unions are just taking your money and giving you nothing in return is really...well, not very smart.Night Strike wrote:There's a huge difference between thinking you deserve to be paid more and having your money taken by a group that you don't agree with simply because you work there. Those unions don't actually pay you, you pay them. Employers pay you, you don't pay them.GreecePwns wrote:If the members really care so much about having their money spent like that, then they should reconsider their membership. If your job forces you to be part of a union, get a new job. Of course finding a job is easier said than done, but thats an argument made by conservatives for those pesky lazy poor people.
yeah but the extra money made, is that more than the union dues you gotta pay?Woodruff wrote:You say that the unions don't pay you, and that's mostly true. Yet the unions DO have a hand in how much you are paid, as well as your benefits. So to pretend that the unions are just taking your money and giving you nothing in return is really...well, not very smart.Night Strike wrote:There's a huge difference between thinking you deserve to be paid more and having your money taken by a group that you don't agree with simply because you work there. Those unions don't actually pay you, you pay them. Employers pay you, you don't pay them.GreecePwns wrote:If the members really care so much about having their money spent like that, then they should reconsider their membership. If your job forces you to be part of a union, get a new job. Of course finding a job is easier said than done, but thats an argument made by conservatives for those pesky lazy poor people.
Your school district must not be "progressive" enough then but it sounds like they give you a 'real education" as opposed to those pesky home schoolers who keep winning the national spelling bees.You will have to show me evidence of even a single school district that passes out condoms to 8 year olds. Here, not even high schoolers get them in school.

Hahahahaha......Ok I'll just go get a new job. I did not realize it would be that easy to do right now. Well, like you hint at, it may not be really hard to find a job but to find one that pays decent, good luckGreecePwns wrote:If the members really care so much about having their money spent like that, then they should reconsider their membership. If your job forces you to be part of a union, get a new job. Of course finding a job is easier said than done, but thats an argument made by conservatives for those pesky lazy poor people.

PopeBenXVI wrote:Hahahahaha......Ok I'll just go get a new job. I did not realize it would be that easy to do right now.GreecePwns wrote:If the members really care so much about having their money spent like that, then they should reconsider their membership. If your job forces you to be part of a union, get a new job. Of course finding a job is easier said than done, but thats an argument made by conservatives for those pesky lazy poor people.

the real question is who are the fleebaggers receiving all their financial support from? It's illegal for them to take money outside of their state.PopeBenXVI wrote:it looks like $1 out of $5 campaign dollars for the missing 14 Dems comes from Public sector unions. For some of them it's over half. I am sure that has nothing to do with all this. It's all about workers "rights" even though they still would have more bargaining power than all federal employees under Obama as well as most other states public unions.
In WI? Not according to polls. Of course, the right wing has a long history of claiming it is in the majority when it isn't.Phatscotty wrote:sure, but it can, and it is, being fixed. More people can now get what they want.PLAYER57832 wrote:That's what happens in groups. Not everyone always gets what they want.Phatscotty wrote:But you can understand why a lot of independents and conservatives in those unions who pay those dues have a problem right?GreecePwns wrote:Oh, unions donate to democrats? Thanks for that. I didn't know that.
polls from people about what they think might happen is not the same thing as what will happen.PLAYER57832 wrote:In WI? Not according to polls. Of course, the right wing has a long history of claiming it is in the majority when it isn't.Phatscotty wrote:sure, but it can, and it is, being fixed. More people can now get what they want.PLAYER57832 wrote:That's what happens in groups. Not everyone always gets what they want.Phatscotty wrote:But you can understand why a lot of independents and conservatives in those unions who pay those dues have a problem right?GreecePwns wrote:Oh, unions donate to democrats? Thanks for that. I didn't know that.
Having won a majority in the last election does not mean the majority agree with every action that party decides to implement.Phatscotty wrote:polls from people about what they think might happen is not the same thing as what will happen.
P.S. WI Republicans have a hardcore majority. Not "claiming" common knowledge
It's the same argument conservatives used against welfare programs. The poor people are too lazy and aren't working hard enough to find a job is what is always said. If that argument can be made, so can mine. Of course it's an absurd one that really can't be made and I said that right there but go ahead and run with it.PopeBenXVI wrote:Hahahahaha......Ok I'll just go get a new job. I did not realize it would be that easy to do right now.GreecePwns wrote:If the members really care so much about having their money spent like that, then they should reconsider their membership. If your job forces you to be part of a union, get a new job. Of course finding a job is easier said than done, but thats an argument made by conservatives for those pesky lazy poor people.
Chariot of Fire wrote:As for GreecePwns.....yeah, what? A massive debt. Get a job you slacker.
Viceroy wrote:[The Biblical creation story] was written in a time when there was no way to confirm this fact and is in fact a statement of the facts.
Sure. they can change it democratically in 2012 election. All Walker is doing is exactly what he said he would do in his campaign.PLAYER57832 wrote:Having won a majority in the last election does not mean the majority agree with every action that party decides to implement.Phatscotty wrote:polls from people about what they think might happen is not the same thing as what will happen.
P.S. WI Republicans have a hardcore majority. Not "claiming" common knowledge
Win.PopeBenXVI wrote:I will actually side with Juan on this topic. Their are WAY too many things that are labeled as a "felony" and the main purpose of it in my book is to take away our gun rights as individuals. Whatever your belief on the reason for so many little things being a felony is less important but it takes away too many of our rights any way you look at it.
I believe in rights in both senses, but am referring to the Constitutional one. I don't have the right to vote if the government has the authority to take it away. In that sense I only have the privilege to vote.thegreekdog wrote:Juan - your definition of right does not apply to any of the rights that I think we have in the US. For example, arguably we have the right to life, but that can be taken away by anyone including the government (whether directly or indirectly).
I think maybe what you mean is that a right is something guaranteed in the Constitution. But I don't want to put words in your mouth, especially since collective bargaining is not a right guaranteed by the Constitution. If Congress repealed the National Labor Relations Act, there would be no more unions.
No, voting someone into office does not mean you suddenly give up your right to a voice and have installed a dictator. No elected leader responds 100%, they cannot please everyone. However, when those in office step too far outside their bounds, then you see protests and action such as is happening right now in WI.Phatscotty wrote:Sure. they can change it democratically in 2012 election. All Walker is doing is exactly what he said he would do in his campaign.PLAYER57832 wrote:Having won a majority in the last election does not mean the majority agree with every action that party decides to implement.Phatscotty wrote:polls from people about what they think might happen is not the same thing as what will happen.
P.S. WI Republicans have a hardcore majority. Not "claiming" common knowledge
The people have decided. Power to the people.
Without question. Union dues, at least in my experience with teacher's unions (my only experience, admittedly), are not large at all.Phatscotty wrote:yeah but the extra money made, is that more than the union dues you gotta pay?Woodruff wrote:You say that the unions don't pay you, and that's mostly true. Yet the unions DO have a hand in how much you are paid, as well as your benefits. So to pretend that the unions are just taking your money and giving you nothing in return is really...well, not very smart.Night Strike wrote:There's a huge difference between thinking you deserve to be paid more and having your money taken by a group that you don't agree with simply because you work there. Those unions don't actually pay you, you pay them. Employers pay you, you don't pay them.GreecePwns wrote:If the members really care so much about having their money spent like that, then they should reconsider their membership. If your job forces you to be part of a union, get a new job. Of course finding a job is easier said than done, but thats an argument made by conservatives for those pesky lazy poor people.
I don't seem to recall you having this perspective regarding Obamacare. Why is that, Phatscotty?Phatscotty wrote:Sure. they can change it democratically in 2012 election. All Walker is doing is exactly what he said he would do in his campaign.PLAYER57832 wrote:Having won a majority in the last election does not mean the majority agree with every action that party decides to implement.Phatscotty wrote:polls from people about what they think might happen is not the same thing as what will happen.
P.S. WI Republicans have a hardcore majority. Not "claiming" common knowledge
The people have decided. Power to the people.
Install a dictator? Doesn't that totally ignore the whole "2012 election" thingy?PLAYER57832 wrote:No, voting someone into office does not mean you suddenly give up your right to a voice and have installed a dictator.Phatscotty wrote:Sure. they can change it democratically in 2012 election. All Walker is doing is exactly what he said he would do in his campaign.PLAYER57832 wrote:Having won a majority in the last election does not mean the majority agree with every action that party decides to implement.Phatscotty wrote:polls from people about what they think might happen is not the same thing as what will happen.
P.S. WI Republicans have a hardcore majority. Not "claiming" common knowledge
The people have decided. Power to the people.

To quote a famouse Wisconsonian:Phatscotty wrote:
Install a dictator? Doesn't that totally ignore the whole "2012 election" thingy?
Not a respectable poll.PopeBenXVI wrote:That was classic!!! I just got a call from aflcio taking a poll. (I asked him who he was with) They gave me their 1 minute lecture and then asked if they could "mark me down" that I agreed Government officials in Wisconsin needed to look out for the worker. What an over generalized question leading into a vary specific answer. Instead of answering their ridiculous question I said "who is looking out for the taxpayers?" He then said excuse me? I then asked the question a second time and then the Union drown hung up! I wonder if he "marked me down" as opposing for their survey.
I agree, other polls questions are much more fair. Their union is a disgrace for that phone call I got. The only real difference I can see in gallup etc would be to ask how many in the sampling are public employees. To really know what wisconsin residents without Gov pensions think I would like to see a survey that excludes them in the polling. Just polling the working poor who do not have but pay for others cadillac healthcare plans from the union owned insurance company.....that would be interesting. To my knowledge that poll does not exist but I could be wrong. With 300,000 public employees in a state of 5.5 million people, obviously many want to keep their own benefits.PLAYER57832 wrote:Not a respectable poll.PopeBenXVI wrote:That was classic!!! I just got a call from aflcio taking a poll. (I asked him who he was with) They gave me their 1 minute lecture and then asked if they could "mark me down" that I agreed Government officials in Wisconsin needed to look out for the worker. What an over generalized question leading into a vary specific answer. Instead of answering their ridiculous question I said "who is looking out for the taxpayers?" He then said excuse me? I then asked the question a second time and then the Union drown hung up! I wonder if he "marked me down" as opposing for their survey.
Since I am usually registered as a Democrat and my husband a Republican, we tend to get them from both sides.
Gallup, etc do not use those tactics.

The direction the democracy is going to take is in fact decided in one day.PLAYER57832 wrote:To quote a famouse Wisconsonian:Phatscotty wrote:
Install a dictator? Doesn't that totally ignore the whole "2012 election" thingy?
"Democracy does not happen for just 1 day".
Do a google search, would you, before you claim I don't know what I am talking about next time..Phatscotty wrote:The direction the democracy is going to take is in fact decided in one day.PLAYER57832 wrote:To quote a famouse Wisconsonian:Phatscotty wrote:
Install a dictator? Doesn't that totally ignore the whole "2012 election" thingy?
"Democracy does not happen for just 1 day".
you really are something