Moderator: Community Team

Barney FrankMr_Adams wrote:Mouch=Obama
Phatscotty wrote:Barney FrankMr_Adams wrote:Mouch=Obama
I was introduced to the pirate recently. I like where this is going.
Chariot of Fire wrote:As for GreecePwns.....yeah, what? A massive debt. Get a job you slacker.
Viceroy wrote:[The Biblical creation story] was written in a time when there was no way to confirm this fact and is in fact a statement of the facts.
The movie comes to wherever there is a demand for it. The movie has not been advertised. People have to vocally demand it otherwise it won't be shown. I don't know what is going on with that except opening weekend 299 theaters? Maybe they are just seeing how it sill stand all by itself without all the hollywood BS? I wouldn't put it past the movie. It's running on pure demand.GreecePwns wrote:We in the biz like to call this a 20 million dollar fail:
Week 1: 299 theatres, 1.6 million dollars
Week 2: 465 theatres, .8 million dollars
Week 3: 371 theatres, .4 million dollars
http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=atlasshrugged.htmAtlas Shrugged Domestic Total as of May. 1, 2011: $3,947,827
Yeah well if you look at the comment I made a page or two ago about the guy complaining that liberals in Hollywood wouldn't give him a 50 million budget, you'd see that he clearly didn't deserve one and the free market won out here.Mr_Adams wrote:Haha, a movie with a smaller production budget than most movies have in their advertisement budget and Greecepwns won't shut the hell up over it not making money. IT'S AN INDEPENDENT FILM, THESE HARDLY EVER MAKE MONEY.
Chariot of Fire wrote:As for GreecePwns.....yeah, what? A massive debt. Get a job you slacker.
Viceroy wrote:[The Biblical creation story] was written in a time when there was no way to confirm this fact and is in fact a statement of the facts.
Was he really complaining? or stating as a joke (because everyone knows why hollywood wouldn't give him 50 million?)?GreecePwns wrote:Yeah well if you look at the comment I made a page or two ago about the guy complaining that liberals in Hollywood wouldn't give him a 50 million budget, you'd see that he clearly didn't deserve one and the free market won out here.Mr_Adams wrote:Haha, a movie with a smaller production budget than most movies have in their advertisement budget and Greecepwns won't shut the hell up over it not making money. IT'S AN INDEPENDENT FILM, THESE HARDLY EVER MAKE MONEY.
I'll watch it whenever I can find a torrent before I make final judgement.
Chariot of Fire wrote:As for GreecePwns.....yeah, what? A massive debt. Get a job you slacker.
Viceroy wrote:[The Biblical creation story] was written in a time when there was no way to confirm this fact and is in fact a statement of the facts.
Are you going to see it?GreecePwns wrote:Source? Sorry but maybe your numbers include the recent weekend.
Atlas Shrugged Producer: "Critics: You Won"
"Atlas Shrugged" was the top-grossing limited release in its opening weekend, generating $1.7 million on 299 screens and earning a respectable $5,640 per screen. But the the box office dropped off 47% in the film's second week in release even as "Atlas Shrugged" expanded to 425 screens, and the movie seemed to hold little appeal for audiences beyond the core group of Rand fans to whom it was marketed."
It goes on to say later that it has made $3.1 million (as of April 26 I believe)
Chariot of Fire wrote:As for GreecePwns.....yeah, what? A massive debt. Get a job you slacker.
Viceroy wrote:[The Biblical creation story] was written in a time when there was no way to confirm this fact and is in fact a statement of the facts.
Let's not forget that final production cost will be around $25 million.Total Grosses Domestic: $3,947,827
Domestic Summary Opening Weekend: $1,686,347
It's been out for 3 weeks. Opening weekend what 1.7 mil. The next 2 weeks are 2.3 mil more, making the average after the opening week 1.15 mil, which seems strong for something opening to 1.7. More weeks will roll by, more millions will come in.
tobinov wrote:Let's not forget that final production cost will be around $25 million.Total Grosses Domestic: $3,947,827
Domestic Summary Opening Weekend: $1,686,347
It's been out for 3 weeks. Opening weekend what 1.7 mil. The next 2 weeks are 2.3 mil more, making the average after the opening week 1.15 mil, which seems strong for something opening to 1.7. More weeks will roll by, more millions will come in.
(...and before you blow a nut, that figure comes from Producer John Aglialoro and the movie website)
Ah the irony that the film championing the ideals of free market capitalism and anti-government sentiment, the film darling of the Tea Party movement, might have trouble balancing it's own budget.
I say, the public shrugged.
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
And the films producer, John Aglialoro, said estimated costs closer to $25 mil...pimpdave wrote: EDIT: oh hey, what do you know. I start reading that LA Times article and in the second paragraph they mention the 20 mil figure.
No, Chicago School of Economics pornography is not my thing.Phatscotty wrote:Will you see it tobi? It beats reading the book
Producers often publicly inflate estimated costs, to prepare to gyp their actors and crew and any other investor that was awarded points in lieu of salary. Look up the scandal surrounding Tim Burton's Batman, concerning paying out the windfall points. I think a book may have even been written about it.tobinov wrote:And the films producer, John Aglialoro, said estimated costs closer to $25 mil...pimpdave wrote: EDIT: oh hey, what do you know. I start reading that LA Times article and in the second paragraph they mention the 20 mil figure.
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
Do you know anything about the ideas in the book?tobinov wrote:No, Chicago School of Economics pornography is not my thing.Phatscotty wrote:Will you see it tobi? It beats reading the book
Yes. I am well aware of Ayn Rand's Objectivist philosophy. Like I said, I am not into Chicago School of Economic pornography.Phatscotty wrote:Do you know anything about the ideas in the book?tobinov wrote:No, Chicago School of Economics pornography is not my thing.Phatscotty wrote:Will you see it tobi? It beats reading the book
Why do you label Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged as "Chicago School of Economic pornography"?tobinov wrote: Yes. I am well aware of Ayn Rand's Objectivist philosophy. Like I said, I am not into Chicago School of Economic pornography.
Is he talking about Chicago style politics? I've heard that phrase bandied about like crazy during the last three years.BigBallinStalin wrote:Why do you label Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged as "Chicago School of Economic pornography"?tobinov wrote: Yes. I am well aware of Ayn Rand's Objectivist philosophy. Like I said, I am not into Chicago School of Economic pornography.