anarchist dream nost random votes at the beginning of day one usually mean nothing they are a way of getting people to talk and from this you can start to make your educated guesses, so they are actually a very good way to start. especially when nothing happens in the night so there are no leads
Battles are won by slaughter and manoeuvre. The greater the general, the more he contributes in manoeuvre, the less he demands in slaughter. Winston Churchill
Anarkistsdream wrote: I believe using random.org is stupid... It will be a random vote, obviously, but we can at least bother to make educated guesses before jumping to conclusions... True randomness is not what is called for here... Eductaed guesses, however, are very useful.
I never said that my vote was unchangable. The vote is just to get the ball rolling on this game. Of course if the discussion is showing that someone seems pretty guilty, then of course I'm going to change my vote. Right now, there really isnt anything at all to go on though
Well if im going to random vote, i vote spinwizard for that bonehead comment about minkish and random.org voting. I don't think he is dumb enough to do so, but it could be he is trying to start people on a bandwagon against minkish.
I have to agree with wicked about initially keeping a lid on town info. Loose lips sink ships.
Anarkist, absent a full-on meltdown by someone under light questioning, there are no educated guesses to be made on day one. When we lynch, it'll be pretty random.
Thankfully no one's been pushing the no-lynch. That seems like a dead issue.
Call me blindly prejudiced, but I'd be more inclined to lynch someone that either A) hasn't played in one of auto's (or, failing that, andy's or AK's) games or B) has a history in other mafia games of submarining. Especially B.
THOTA: dingdingdingdingdingdingBOOM
Te Occidere Possunt Sed Te Edere Non Possunt Nefas Est
wicked wrote:I have a new strategy. I will vote the last person to post.
unvote koolaidman
The last person to post by when? You mean the last person in the list of players who posts? That is fairly logical...
Also, to everyone here who felt the need to lecture me on my viewpoints... I disagree with all of you. But thanks for giving your AGE-OLD wisdom to me...
I find that a what all of you have already said has allowed me to make educated guesses, without ever needing a vote on anyone...
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Minkish wrote:for now Vote for dummies becasue of random.org. Until there is some more evidence, thats who my vote is for
That is quite silly. You should at least wait and make sure no one slips up and says something stupid. Or you can base your vote off the way people played in previous games. even on the first day votes should have a little reason in them.
viperbitex wrote: what the f*ck were the dinosaurs all about?? Did G-Dog wear his silly pants one day 10 million years ago and make them??
If someone is against randomvote.org or whatever, that tells me the person in not mafia, or whatever we're calling them. The bad guys would be in total favor of random votes on day 1 or any day for that matter.
So I somewhat trust Anarkistsdream at the moment.
"You know what they say about Love and War...." "Yeah, one involves a lot of physical and psychological pain, and the other one's War."
Minkish wrote:for now Vote for dummies becasue of random.org. Until there is some more evidence, thats who my vote is for
That is quite silly. You should at least wait and make sure no one slips up and says something stupid. Or you can base your vote off the way people played in previous games. even on the first day votes should have a little reason in them.
unvote for dummies glad to see an early post. I also will fos minkish. He claims that his vote is from random.org, but who do we really know that? He could just be saying that, to cover him hoping on my bandwagon for dummies.
He's looking scummy.
"You know what they say about Love and War...." "Yeah, one involves a lot of physical and psychological pain, and the other one's War."
this is possible but with 8 votes needed to lynch it seems unprobable. we all have experience and he must have known that trying to get a pointless bandwagon started so soon would make him seems suspicious. I doubt any mafia members are that stupid. then again i could be wrong. you have played more mafia then i have
viperbitex wrote: what the f*ck were the dinosaurs all about?? Did G-Dog wear his silly pants one day 10 million years ago and make them??
Master Bush wrote: unvote for dummies glad to see an early post. I also will fos minkish. He claims that his vote is from random.org, but who do we really know that? He could just be saying that, to cover him hoping on my bandwagon for dummies.
He's looking scummy.
It was far from a bandwaggon attempt. I'd show you the printscreen of number 13 coming up, but that was a good half hour ago now. The fact that it happened to land on a person already randomized is a mere coincidence.
As stated on the previous pages, the random vote on day 1 is mainly to get discussion up. If people actually stareted voting for dummies, then I would see your point. As it is though, 2 people voted for him, and we need 8 to lynch.
well I see nothing has changed since i last posted, so i am off to me cabin for a nights sleep. will check in tomorrow night after work
Battles are won by slaughter and manoeuvre. The greater the general, the more he contributes in manoeuvre, the less he demands in slaughter. Winston Churchill