Moderator: Community Team
riskllama wrote:Koolbak wins this thread.
Yes and no.mrswdk wrote:You do realize you're free to simply not buy food that's bad quality, right?Dualta wrote:Unregulated capitalism is responsible for the obesity epidemic across the world. Corporations have been allowed to run rampage with the food supply.
Yeah, but i bet you that "poor" person you're talking about has a smart phone, a couple of plasma tvs, a laptop or two and a PS4. Not to mention that he/she decided to move to the city and pay 1500 dls of rent because it's the right thing to do when in his father's farm there's plenty of space to build a nice room for himself and not have to pay rent.tkr4lf wrote:Yes and no.mrswdk wrote:You do realize you're free to simply not buy food that's bad quality, right?Dualta wrote:Unregulated capitalism is responsible for the obesity epidemic across the world. Corporations have been allowed to run rampage with the food supply.
If you can afford the better food, then sure, you're free to not purchase crap food. However, if you're poor, then you're stuck with what you can afford, which is the cheap, processed crap food. Eating healthy can be an expensive habit. Eating unhealthy is cheap. You do the math.
Well, I personally don't know anybody that lives in the city that had the option of living on their father's farm. Maybe that's just a Mexico thing??nietzsche wrote:Yeah, but i bet you that "poor" person you're talking about has a smart phone, a couple of plasma tvs, a laptop or two and a PS4. Not to mention that he/she decided to move to the city and pay 1500 dls of rent because it's the right thing to do when in his father's farm there's plenty of space to build a nice room for himself and not have to pay rent.tkr4lf wrote:Yes and no.mrswdk wrote:You do realize you're free to simply not buy food that's bad quality, right?Dualta wrote:Unregulated capitalism is responsible for the obesity epidemic across the world. Corporations have been allowed to run rampage with the food supply.
If you can afford the better food, then sure, you're free to not purchase crap food. However, if you're poor, then you're stuck with what you can afford, which is the cheap, processed crap food. Eating healthy can be an expensive habit. Eating unhealthy is cheap. You do the math.
Nay. Fruit, vegetables, pasta, rice etc. are not expensive.tkr4lf wrote:Yes and no.mrswdk wrote:You do realize you're free to simply not buy food that's bad quality, right?Dualta wrote:Unregulated capitalism is responsible for the obesity epidemic across the world. Corporations have been allowed to run rampage with the food supply.
If you can afford the better food, then sure, you're free to not purchase crap food. However, if you're poor, then you're stuck with what you can afford, which is the cheap, processed crap food. Eating healthy can be an expensive habit. Eating unhealthy is cheap. You do the math.
riskllama wrote:Koolbak wins this thread.
Yeah, that's a real Sophie's Choice you've got there.tkr4lf wrote:honestly, given these two choices, which would you choose? Eat super healthy and have no entertainment at all in your house, or eat crappily and be entertained at home. Or I guess there could be a middle ground, where you have a mid-size plasma tv and a smart phone and cable, and still eat reasonably healthy. The middle path is much harder for most, though.
For the same price you can buy large family lasagna's at Aldi over here, and those include meat and take no time to prepare.KoolBak wrote:Yeah I call bullshit on processed food being cheaperDone all the shopping and cooking for our family of 4 (20 years now) and its a hell of a lot cheaper to buy a bag of rice / pasta and ingredients (fresh veggies, cheap protein, generic shit to make sauces)....meal comes to a buck and change or less per person if you're smart and it's good food. Cant buy a fucking 1500 calorie hungry man TV dinner for that
mrswdk wrote:You do realize you're free to simply not buy food that's bad quality, right?Dualta wrote:Unregulated capitalism is responsible for the obesity epidemic across the world. Corporations have been allowed to run rampage with the food supply.
I don't smoke, don't often drink and have never taken heroin. mrswdk - 1, evil corporations - 0.Dualta wrote:You're simply free not to smoke tobacco, drink alcohol or take heroin, but as the article I linked clearly shows, the food corporations are designing their foods to get people addicted, so the argument that we're free to eat this stuff weakens considerably.mrswdk wrote:You do realize you're free to simply not buy food that's bad quality, right?Dualta wrote:Unregulated capitalism is responsible for the obesity epidemic across the world. Corporations have been allowed to run rampage with the food supply.
Don't you guys have labeling on your food?There's also ignorance involved. Many people simply don't know the full extent of junk in the food supply. We all know that chocolate, pastries and fast food are fattening, but so many people are not aware of how much fat and sugar is being put into what we would normally consider to be relatively healthy foods, like salad dressings, pasta sauces, curry sauces and so on.
lol. I live in a country that is constantly having the gnarliest food safety scandals you could ever imagine, and despite eating at cheap restaurants and from street vendors relatively often I'm still doing just fine.So people are eating what they think is a reasonably healthy diet, but they're getting fat and blaming themselves for over-eating when they're most probably not, rather than questioning their food choices. Reflecting what the former corporate food scientist in that article said, I also feel sorry for the public who are truly being kept in the dark and fed bullshit.
Exactly. I don't see why you're so convinced that it's difficult for other people to also do that.Most people are not greedy for food. The average person will eat their fill and leave it at that. The problem is, processed foods are highly calorie laden and our bodies can't tell the difference between 100g of spinach and 100g of white bread. We can eat to full on whole foods or processed foods but only the latter will make us fat. I eat a whole foods diet, with minimal processed foods, and I eat to full four or five times a day, and at lunch and dinner I'm at 'need-to-sit-down-for-a-bit full', yet I have a near perfect BMI for my age and height.
You can buy a 4 lb frozen lasagne for $4? Decent prepackaged frozen lasagne here is about $2 - $3 / lb (and no where near as good as homemade ;o). My homemade lasagne is about $1.50 / lb and 100% better.....waauw wrote:to be fair, tkr4lf isn't entirely wrong. I don't know about the food in your countries but over here Bio-vegetables/fruit are more expensive than their less healthy counterparts.
For the same price you can buy large family lasagna's at Aldi over here, and those include meat and take no time to prepare.KoolBak wrote:Yeah I call bullshit on processed food being cheaperDone all the shopping and cooking for our family of 4 (20 years now) and its a hell of a lot cheaper to buy a bag of rice / pasta and ingredients (fresh veggies, cheap protein, generic shit to make sauces)....meal comes to a buck and change or less per person if you're smart and it's good food. Cant buy a fucking 1500 calorie hungry man TV dinner for that
riskllama wrote:Koolbak wins this thread.
I'm rather sceptical about that. Can't buy cheese, even crappy cheese, for less than about $5/lb. Can't buy beef, even crappy beef, for less than about $7/lb, so unless you raise your own cattle, I'd be very sceptical about what kind of lasagne you can make for $1.50/lb. At that price it has to be mostly pasta and fillers, and very skimpy on the meat and cheese.KoolBak wrote:You can buy a 4 lb frozen lasagne for $4? Decent prepackaged frozen lasagne here is about $2 - $3 / lb (and no where near as good as homemade ;o). My homemade lasagne is about $1.50 / lb and 100% better.....waauw wrote:to be fair, tkr4lf isn't entirely wrong. I don't know about the food in your countries but over here Bio-vegetables/fruit are more expensive than their less healthy counterparts.
For the same price you can buy large family lasagna's at Aldi over here, and those include meat and take no time to prepare.KoolBak wrote:Yeah I call bullshit on processed food being cheaperDone all the shopping and cooking for our family of 4 (20 years now) and its a hell of a lot cheaper to buy a bag of rice / pasta and ingredients (fresh veggies, cheap protein, generic shit to make sauces)....meal comes to a buck and change or less per person if you're smart and it's good food. Cant buy a fucking 1500 calorie hungry man TV dinner for that
riskllama wrote:Koolbak wins this thread.
If you were to measure out the amount of individual ingredients in many processed foods and compared them with the cost of buying those ingredients as wholefoods, you'd find that it's cheaper to cook at home. We cook all our meals from mostly wholefoods, accept difficult to make ingredients like like pasta, soy sauce and the likes. When we were younger and less house trained, we would buy ready meals and it definitely worked out to be more expensive.Dukasaur wrote:I'm rather sceptical about that. Can't buy cheese, even crappy cheese, for less than about $5/lb. Can't buy beef, even crappy beef, for less than about $7/lb, so unless you raise your own cattle, I'd be very sceptical about what kind of lasagne you can make for $1.50/lb. At that price it has to be mostly pasta and fillers, and very skimpy on the meat and cheese.KoolBak wrote:You can buy a 4 lb frozen lasagne for $4? Decent prepackaged frozen lasagne here is about $2 - $3 / lb (and no where near as good as homemade ;o). My homemade lasagne is about $1.50 / lb and 100% better.....waauw wrote:to be fair, tkr4lf isn't entirely wrong. I don't know about the food in your countries but over here Bio-vegetables/fruit are more expensive than their less healthy counterparts.
For the same price you can buy large family lasagna's at Aldi over here, and those include meat and take no time to prepare.KoolBak wrote:Yeah I call bullshit on processed food being cheaperDone all the shopping and cooking for our family of 4 (20 years now) and its a hell of a lot cheaper to buy a bag of rice / pasta and ingredients (fresh veggies, cheap protein, generic shit to make sauces)....meal comes to a buck and change or less per person if you're smart and it's good food. Cant buy a fucking 1500 calorie hungry man TV dinner for that
Of course, but most people can't make head nor tail of what is written on ingredients labels, and they are also being misled by an industry and it's lackeys in government who tell them that this kind of food is absolutely fine to eat 'in moderation', but that means nothing when the food is being designed to make sure moderation is not on the menu.mrswdk wrote:Don't you guys have labeling on your food?Dualta wrote:There's also ignorance involved. Many people simply don't know the full extent of junk in the food supply. We all know that chocolate, pastries and fast food are fattening, but so many people are not aware of how much fat and sugar is being put into what we would normally consider to be relatively healthy foods, like salad dressings, pasta sauces, curry sauces and so on.
People don't know they're addicted. Again, it's back to ignorance. Who here thinks it's possible to be addicted to a kind of food? Hardly anyone. But we now know, through scientific inquiry and the sort of excellent investigative journalism that I linked in the above article, that that is exactly what is happening, and not by accident, but by design, the design of those who manufacture this food to ensure that the consumer will keep coming back for more.mrswdk wrote:Exactly. I don't see why you're so convinced that it's difficult for other people to also do that.Dualta wrote:Most people are not greedy for food. The average person will eat their fill and leave it at that. The problem is, processed foods are highly calorie laden and our bodies can't tell the difference between 100g of spinach and 100g of white bread. We can eat to full on whole foods or processed foods but only the latter will make us fat. I eat a whole foods diet, with minimal processed foods, and I eat to full four or five times a day, and at lunch and dinner I'm at 'need-to-sit-down-for-a-bit full', yet I have a near perfect BMI for my age and height.
Ignorance has nothing to do with intellect. Even very highly intelligent people are ignorant about a lot of things. I was just as ignorant about food once, but then I made diet choices based on ethical considerations that required research to do right, and in doing so I learned a lot about the food supply, the production, economics, public policy, and marketing involved and the unethical behaviour (profiteering) of many of the people involved in these activities.mrswdk wrote:So what makes you different? Are you simply just gifted with a superior intellect to most of your fellow nationals?
mrswdk wrote: the broken dreams of Indian orphans.
Somehow I now picture you living in a hobbit-hole with an immensely filled pantry.KoolBak wrote:Course you have to buy bulk amounts of food and many don't swing that way.....your food prices suck,......hoser......
don't forget the GMO's!mrswdk wrote:Watch out, the NWO is selling you vegetables filled with puppy bones and the broken dreams of Indian orphans.
waauw wrote:Somehow I now picture you living in a hobbit-hole with an immensely filled pantry.KoolBak wrote:Course you have to buy bulk amounts of food and many don't swing that way.....your food prices suck,......hoser......
riskllama wrote:Koolbak wins this thread.