How are looking after children disgusting?Neutrino wrote:No, his grammar, and his point, are both reasonably accurate.brooksieb wrote:
And children is disgusting? you blame my english and yet you make the same mistake?
Moderator: Community Team
Read the sentence back obeying the rule that text in brackets can be ignored. It makes perfect sense.brooksieb wrote:How are looking after children disgusting?Neutrino wrote:No, his grammar, and his point, are both reasonably accurate.brooksieb wrote:
And children is disgusting? you blame my english and yet you make the same mistake?
qwert wrote:Can i ask you something?What is porpose for you to open these Political topic in ConquerClub? Why you mix politic with Risk? Why you not open topic like HOT AND SEXY,or something like that.
Ergo, you're disgusting.brooksieb wrote:yes them looking after us and children are disgusting?
well we are all on this world to look after eachother, what's wrong with people looking after other people these days? my mum and dad looked after me when i was young.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
You immense imbecile... Go back and re-read the sentence. Ignore the bit in brackets if it will help you. Then try and comprehend what possible point he's trying to make...brooksieb wrote:yes them looking after us and children are disgusting?
well we are all on this world to look after eachother, what's wrong with people looking after other people these days? my mum and dad looked after me when i was young.
qwert wrote:Can i ask you something?What is porpose for you to open these Political topic in ConquerClub? Why you mix politic with Risk? Why you not open topic like HOT AND SEXY,or something like that.