Reagan VS. Clinton

[Aradhus]

Baron Von PWN means consistently support freedom, and not just support it when it suits your goals.

[Phatscotty]

Baron Von PWN means consistently support freedom, and not just support it when it suits your goals.

wow, you listened to the speech pretty quickly.....or,,,maybe.....STILL .......you are clueless on the subject matter.

[Phatscotty]

Ronald Reagan made it LEGAL for US citizens to own gold again in 1986.....that is the #1 pre-requisite of freedom. I consider the right to own Gold to credit more cause to freedom than almost anything else

[Baron Von PWN]

It's pretty annoying that the US has consistently supported repressive regimes in order to stop democratic ones it doesn't like. It would be nice to have the leader of the free world support freedom.

perhaps you should listen to reagans speech, just before he says "Tear Down this Wall!" You will see a leader supporting freedom., it can be found on page 1 of this thread, not more than 3 mintues

Wow it's great he made a nice speech about freedom, too bad he supported repressive dictatorships across the globe.

[Phatscotty]

It's pretty annoying that the US has consistently supported repressive regimes in order to stop democratic ones it doesn't like. It would be nice to have the leader of the free world support freedom.

perhaps you should listen to reagans speech, just before he says "Tear Down this Wall!" You will see a leader supporting freedom., it can be found on page 1 of this thread, not more than 3 mintues

Wow it's great he made a nice speech about freedom, too bad he supported repressive dictatorships across the globe.

who then, is qualified.....to put an end to supporting repressive dictatorships across the globe? Who do you recommend? Do you have representative government? Who have you contacted to bring about the issue? you throw it around pretty good on a forum. whats your shpeel

[spurgistan]

It's pretty annoying that the US has consistently supported repressive regimes in order to stop democratic ones it doesn't like. It would be nice to have the leader of the free world support freedom.

perhaps you should listen to reagans speech, just before he says "Tear Down this Wall!" You will see a leader supporting freedom., it can be found on page 1 of this thread, not more than 3 mintues

Wow it's great he made a nice speech about freedom, too bad he supported repressive dictatorships across the globe.

who then, is qualified.....to put an end to supporting repressive dictatorships across the globe? Who do you recommend? Do you have representative government? Who have you contacted to bring about the issue? you throw it around pretty good on a forum. whats your shpeel

That doesn't make Ronald Reagan not a hypocrite.

[Baron Von PWN]

who then, is qualified.....to put an end to supporting repressive dictatorships across the globe? Who do you recommend? Do you have representative government? Who have you contacted to bring about the issue? you throw it around pretty good on a forum. whats your shpeel

I dunno who, just pointing out Reagan is a douche. What I would like to see a US government do, I don't care which administration any administration will do, is stop giving money and arms to dictatorships. You don't have to go in and overthrow them, or even put trade sanctions on them. Just stop giving them money and stop giving them weapons.

[Phatscotty]

who then, is qualified.....to put an end to supporting repressive dictatorships across the globe? Who do you recommend? Do you have representative government? Who have you contacted to bring about the issue? you throw it around pretty good on a forum. whats your shpeel

I dunno who, just pointing out Reagan is a douche. What I would like to see a US government do, I don't care which administration any administration will do, is stop giving money and arms to dictatorships. You don't have to go in and overthrow them, or even put trade sanctions on them. Just stop giving them money and stop giving them weapons.

those are not real world strategies. dictators will exist, and we have to find some way to trade/deal with them. Everything isn't rose petals

[Baron Von PWN]

who then, is qualified.....to put an end to supporting repressive dictatorships across the globe? Who do you recommend? Do you have representative government? Who have you contacted to bring about the issue? you throw it around pretty good on a forum. whats your shpeel

I dunno who, just pointing out Reagan is a douche. What I would like to see a US government do, I don't care which administration any administration will do, is stop giving money and arms to dictatorships. You don't have to go in and overthrow them, or even put trade sanctions on them. Just stop giving them money and stop giving them weapons.

those are not real world strategies. dictators will exist, and we have to find some way to trade/deal with them. Everything isn't rose petals

Fine trade with them, but don't give them guns and aid.

[Phatscotty]

who then, is qualified.....to put an end to supporting repressive dictatorships across the globe? Who do you recommend? Do you have representative government? Who have you contacted to bring about the issue? you throw it around pretty good on a forum. whats your shpeel

I dunno who, just pointing out Reagan is a douche. What I would like to see a US government do, I don't care which administration any administration will do, is stop giving money and arms to dictatorships. You don't have to go in and overthrow them, or even put trade sanctions on them. Just stop giving them money and stop giving them weapons.

those are not real world strategies. dictators will exist, and we have to find some way to trade/deal with them. Everything isn't rose petals

Fine trade with them, but don't give them guns and aid.

question dodger. WHO? or even how? your'e still up....

[Baron Von PWN]

who then, is qualified.....to put an end to supporting repressive dictatorships across the globe? Who do you recommend? Do you have representative government? Who have you contacted to bring about the issue? you throw it around pretty good on a forum. whats your shpeel

I dunno who, just pointing out Reagan is a douche. What I would like to see a US government do, I don't care which administration any administration will do, is stop giving money and arms to dictatorships. You don't have to go in and overthrow them, or even put trade sanctions on them. Just stop giving them money and stop giving them weapons.

those are not real world strategies. dictators will exist, and we have to find some way to trade/deal with them. Everything isn't rose petals

Fine trade with them, but don't give them guns and aid.

question dodger. WHO? or even how? your'e still up....

I dunno I'm not fammiliar with all american politicians. It's pretty easy to not give dictatorships guns or aid. You just don't send it.

[Phatscotty]

I dunno who, just pointing out Reagan is a douche. What I would like to see a US government do, I don't care which administration any administration will do, is stop giving money and arms to dictatorships. You don't have to go in and overthrow them, or even put trade sanctions on them. Just stop giving them money and stop giving them weapons.
those are not real world strategies. dictators will exist, and we have to find some way to trade/deal with them. Everything isn't rose petals

Fine trade with them, but don't give them guns and aid.
question dodger. WHO? or even how? your'e still up....

I dunno I'm not fammiliar with all american politicians. It's pretty easy to not give dictatorships guns or aid. You just don't send it.

wow, Baron just discovered world peace with one bold sentence! for the win...

[Baron Von PWN]

wow, Baron just discovered world peace with one bold sentence! for the win...

Certainly not world peace. It would at least make the USA act on its supposed ideals.

[Aradhus]

Baron Von PWN means consistently support freedom, and not just support it when it suits your goals.

wow, you listened to the speech pretty quickly.....or,,,maybe.....STILL .......you are clueless on the subject matter.

What the f*ck does that have to do with what I said? There is no connect between what I said, and this idiotic comment of yours. The point I was clarifying is that when you only push freedom when it serves your agenda, that makes you a hypocrite, just using the concept of freedom to serve your own end. Jesus you're fucking stupid.

(and not that it matters, but I've heard and read the speech before, simpleton)

[Titanic]

Getting it back on topic I think Clinton was much better as he was the kind of president who would react quickly to issues and calm them down, but also have a good long term strategy to counter the much harder problems. I can't talk too specifically about Reagan here, but a lot of leaders and politicians just make knee-jerk policies. Also Clinton practised what he preached (most of the time) unlike Reagan who often went back on himself and contradicted his own arguament with his actions.

[pimpdave]

http://www.theonion.com/content/video/z ... from_grave

[Baron Von PWN]

This seems relevant.

http://www.virtualvideomap.com/the_worl ... eagan.html

[Titanic]

This seems relevant.

http://www.virtualvideomap.com/the_worl ... eagan.html

Ah, been a while since I last saw that.

[Phatscotty]

Baron Von PWN means consistently support freedom, and not just support it when it suits your goals.

wow, you listened to the speech pretty quickly.....or,,,maybe.....STILL .......you are clueless on the subject matter.

What the f*ck does that have to do with what I said? There is no connect between what I said, and this idiotic comment of yours. The point I was clarifying is that when you only push freedom when it serves your agenda, that makes you a hypocrite, just using the concept of freedom to serve your own end. Jesus you're fucking stupid.

(and not that it matters, but I've heard and read the speech before, simpleton)

because, in the very speech, almost a mirror reflection for what you said he should have talked about.....thats all. I heard you speak, and you sounded like Reagan for a minute to me

[Snorri1234]

Baron Von PWN means consistently support freedom, and not just support it when it suits your goals.

wow, you listened to the speech pretty quickly.....or,,,maybe.....STILL .......you are clueless on the subject matter.

What the f*ck does that have to do with what I said? There is no connect between what I said, and this idiotic comment of yours. The point I was clarifying is that when you only push freedom when it serves your agenda, that makes you a hypocrite, just using the concept of freedom to serve your own end. Jesus you're fucking stupid.

(and not that it matters, but I've heard and read the speech before, simpleton)

because, in the very speech, almost a mirror reflection for what you said he should have talked about.....thats all. I heard you speak, and you sounded like Reagan for a minute to me

He didn't mean "talk about", he meant "actually do". They should've given Reagan the Nobel peace Prize like Obama if saying you support freedom is all that's needed.

[Phatscotty]

Baron Von PWN means consistently support freedom, and not just support it when it suits your goals.

wow, you listened to the speech pretty quickly.....or,,,maybe.....STILL .......you are clueless on the subject matter.

What the f*ck does that have to do with what I said? There is no connect between what I said, and this idiotic comment of yours. The point I was clarifying is that when you only push freedom when it serves your agenda, that makes you a hypocrite, just using the concept of freedom to serve your own end. Jesus you're fucking stupid.

(and not that it matters, but I've heard and read the speech before, simpleton)

because, in the very speech, almost a mirror reflection for what you said he should have talked about.....thats all. I heard you speak, and you sounded like Reagan for a minute to me

He didn't mean "talk about", he meant "actually do". They should've given Reagan the Nobel peace Prize like Obama if saying you support freedom is all that's needed.

WRONG, he specifically said "talk about"

Lib Fail

[Snorri1234]

He didn't mean "talk about", he meant "actually do". They should've given Reagan the Nobel peace Prize like Obama if saying you support freedom is all that's needed.

WRONG, he specifically said "talk about"

Lib Fail

Okay, humour me and point to where he said "talk about".

[Phatscotty]

He didn't mean "talk about", he meant "actually do". They should've given Reagan the Nobel peace Prize like Obama if saying you support freedom is all that's needed.

WRONG, he specifically said "talk about"

Lib Fail

Okay, humour me and point to where he said "talk about".

i dont have to point out shit, but I'll give you a hint, its in a post made sometime before this one. think before you blurt

[Snorri1234]

He didn't mean "talk about", he meant "actually do". They should've given Reagan the Nobel peace Prize like Obama if saying you support freedom is all that's needed.

WRONG, he specifically said "talk about"

Lib Fail

Okay, humour me and point to where he said "talk about".

i dont have to point out shit, but I'll give you a hint, its in a post made sometime before this one. think before you blurt

Baron Von PWN means consistently support freedom, and not just support it when it suits your goals.

So that pretty much means "do" as support is an action.

[Phatscotty]

you guys are really stretching there....