well I broke my rule and looked this up for you... looks like zimbabwes recent economic trouble is well recent.
looks like they have had famine since early 2000's
I dont trust wiki much, and I got this from there so there is a grain of salt.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Famine#Famine_in_Africa
"imbabwe in the early-2000s, famine can be caused as an unintentional result of government policy. Malawi ended its famine by subsidizing its farmers against the strictures of the World Bank.[6] During the 1973 Wollo Famine in Ethiopia, food was being shipped out of Wollo to the capital city of Addis Ababa where it could command higher prices. In contrast, at the same time that the citizens of the dictatorships of Ethiopia and Sudan had massive famines in the late-1970s and early-1980s, the democracies of Botswana and Zimbabwe avoided them, despite having worse drops in national food production. This was possible through the creating short-term employment for the worst-affected groups, thus ensuring a minimal amount of income to buy food, for the duration of the localized food disruption and was taken under criticism from opposition political parties and intense media coverage. In other cases, such as Somalia, famine is a consequence of a failed state. Despotism is a known cause of famine; in fact, there has never been a famine in an established liberal democracy.[9]"
pretty good reading.. I learned something. Would you call Greece an "established liberal democracy"? So basically tomorrow when they, germany, and the EU collapse into anarchy, they at least wont have to worry about starving if wiki and precedence is right =D