He never had time. That's what happens when you never post...Aimless wrote:No one. But Greece never claimed.Primate wrote:Yeah, I just spent 5 mins digging through the thread to find them.
Who counterclaimed Greece?
Moderator: Community Team
You REALLY need to read the thread, as opposed to making rash accusations about shit you know nothing about it.Primate wrote:I personally reckon that speedlynching is most inherently stupid thing in mafia. Because people were so impatient, we lost our cop day 1.
I don't see how it's remotely his fault. It's everyone elses for not waiting that 12 hours or whatever. Lynching people without getting claims from them is fairly obviously wrong on a fairly basic level.
I don't think it's suspicious, really, it's just stupid.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Sadly, about half the players here won't claim even if you give them time.Primate wrote:I personally reckon that speedlynching is most inherently stupid thing in mafia. Because people were so impatient, we lost our cop day 1.
I don't see how it's remotely his fault. It's everyone elses for not waiting that 12 hours or whatever. Lynching people without getting claims from them is fairly obviously wrong on a fairly basic level.
I don't think it's suspicious, really, it's just stupid.
I'm not disagreeing with you here, AD, just speaking in general. This crowd seems far to prone to lynching, and I hardly ever see anyone claim, even when they have a power role.Anarkistsdream wrote:He had plenty of time... He posted on page 1 and page 12.... He knew... He chose his idiocy.
Well, that is why invitations are a good idea...Aimless wrote:I'm not disagreeing with you here, AD, just speaking in general. This crowd seems far to prone to lynching, and I hardly ever see anyone claim, even when they have a power role.Anarkistsdream wrote:He had plenty of time... He posted on page 1 and page 12.... He knew... He chose his idiocy.
Basically, almost everyone here plays as if their role was "survivor," not "townie."
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
He's modded a game before. He should know better.Aegnor wrote:Is he acting like that on purpose, misleading us into thinking that he is a noob and thus look more innocent. Or is he really that dumb to edit a post in a mafia game?
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
I know. It's a matter of the board culture here. As for not having a lynch - it is okay to force a lynch if we're up against a deadline. If the deadline is not close, then it is always better for the town to wait for the player to claim.The1exile wrote:Aimless, it's true that we go for lynches but that's simply because there's no point in not having a lynch. We talked before about how interest wanes if no-one contributes.
Well, we don't have a day deadline I think. Then it's just a matter often of wanting to get the deed done and dusted (because we don't want this mafia game to be taken over by our grandchildrenAimless wrote:I know. It's a matter of the board culture here. As for not having a lynch - it is okay to force a lynch if we're up against a deadline. If the deadline is not close, then it is always better for the town to wait for the player to claim.The1exile wrote:Aimless, it's true that we go for lynches but that's simply because there's no point in not having a lynch. We talked before about how interest wanes if no-one contributes.
Well, I can understand their motivation, but meh. It's true that it's the worst thing to do objectively, but subjectively, I can see it's appeal. (I don't play enough games as a townie to form a proper opinion, thoughAimless wrote:Likewise, it is always better for the town for the player to claim; the reticence I see with some players, not claiming out of spite for being lynched, baffles me.
He was on 3 votes at 18:00 on the 18th. two hours later, he was lynched. There was no deadline, and no reason to lynch him that quickly. Throughout the rest of the day, no-one had even mentioned the merest hint of the possibility of a chance that claiming might be a spiffy thing for to do. I think that pretty squarely falls under the banner of a claim-resisting speedlynch, don't you?Anarkistsdream wrote:You REALLY need to read the thread, as opposed to making rash accusations about shit you know nothing about it.Primate wrote:I personally reckon that speedlynching is most inherently stupid thing in mafia. Because people were so impatient, we lost our cop day 1.
I don't see how it's remotely his fault. It's everyone elses for not waiting that 12 hours or whatever. Lynching people without getting claims from them is fairly obviously wrong on a fairly basic level.
I don't think it's suspicious, really, it's just stupid.
No offense, but that's a fact... Read the first three or so pages... He had plenty of time, and knew exactly what he was doing... Then, he disappeared... It was stupid of him, not of anyone else.
Translated Japanese Pikachu Wikipedia Article wrote:Hard nut in the lightning burn it in a soft, then eat with wisdom.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
I think it was a Day One lynch, done on a newbie...Primate wrote:He was on 3 votes at 18:00 on the 18th. two hours later, he was lynched. There was no deadline, and no reason to lynch him that quickly. Throughout the rest of the day, no-one had even mentioned the merest hint of the possibility of a chance that claiming might be a spiffy thing for to do. I think that pretty squarely falls under the banner of a claim-resisting speedlynch, don't you?Anarkistsdream wrote:You REALLY need to read the thread, as opposed to making rash accusations about shit you know nothing about it.Primate wrote:I personally reckon that speedlynching is most inherently stupid thing in mafia. Because people were so impatient, we lost our cop day 1.
I don't see how it's remotely his fault. It's everyone elses for not waiting that 12 hours or whatever. Lynching people without getting claims from them is fairly obviously wrong on a fairly basic level.
I don't think it's suspicious, really, it's just stupid.
No offense, but that's a fact... Read the first three or so pages... He had plenty of time, and knew exactly what he was doing... Then, he disappeared... It was stupid of him, not of anyone else.
@everyone discussing editing: you either think that he is scum editing out suspicious stuff, or you think he made a mistake. If you think that he edited out something suspcious, then please, dears, say what it is you think he removed. Simply editing is not, in itself, suspicious, surely? (admittedly, it is still against the rules, and should be punished but editing doesn't make someone any more likely to be mafia.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.