To anyone who thinks homosexuality is a choice, you should try your hardest to become sexually attracted to your own gender for a while. I think you'll find that no matter how much you try you won't be able to.

Xero-88 wrote:pw plz?

sent

http://images.fanpop.com/images/image_uploads/IQ-vs-Religion-debate-253441_510_289.gif

That looks totally legit.

At least I (and most people here) can say that my IQ is off the chart! That's a real confidence booster. :lol:

A good point john.

Do we have a chart which goes as far above the ...

speaking of intelligent life

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sBNr6BI2zm8

am i the only one whos upload is alot higher than download?

pw plz

i used to have it but quit for about a year

thanks

but the problem with THIS is if SJ (5393) beats Alangary(1), then SJ would get :

((1/5393)*20-((5393-1)/1000) = 0-5.4 = -5.4 (rounded), a NEGATIVE number! He'd lose points, even though he won. THAT would stop farming cooks!

Well there could be a bottom cap at 1 or 0, there is a top cap at 100 ...

Um, I didn't read the whole thread, but I think what he's suggesting is basically

((opponents score/your score)^2) * 20 if you win. So basically just square it before multiplying by 20.

with this, a 3,200 point player say, beating a 800 point player, would normally get 5 points, would now get 1 ...

maxatstuy wrote:this was NOT an "I dont care what people think of me" thread ... I couldnt care less about whether people have respect for me or not ... Have fun trying to insult me or flame me because I couldnt care less...

lol, are you sure it isnt?

To all of the people saying that it would be useless because it would just depend on when you check your games relative to the person before you:

Most people play enough games for the times between you and the person before you to even out. Even if the player before you checks at 9pm, then you ...

I checked old suggestions and was surprised this has never been suggested before, since it really only combines a few already existing modes.

Concise description:
- Add two new modes, Doubles Terminator and Doubles Assassin.

Specifics:
- These modes can only be applied when there are more than ...

They just like to farm noobs a lot for easy points, if you search 1v1 freestyle games every now and then, you'll find a few a day to get points off of.

10 New Games:

8 Player, Standard, Sequential, Escalating, Chained, Sunny.

3178990 - Classic ... full
3178992 - Australia ... full
3178994 - British Isles ... full
3178995 - Canada ... full
3178998 - France ... full
3179002 - Greater China ... full
3179003 - Mongol Empire
3179006 ...

The only problem I see with having multiple scoreboards and having all score adjustments based on overall score, is that someone could abuse one scoreboard by losing a bunch of games in one type to lower their overall, then winning alot in another category, and repeating so they always win alot in ...

I've noticed a lot of people complain about how people will join, or not join a game because of the scores of players in the game, and will play differently depending on the scores also.
High rank players might take out low rank players to avoid a huge point loss, and low rank players might take out ...

I would think the easiest solution would be to make 2 separate categories for medals: Gameplay medals, and Contribution medals.

And also it's highly unlikely that anyone on this site will have <10 points. Right now the lowest score on the site is 65.

the minimum loss of 10 points makes it much easier to get player with <10 points though.

This is why I highly doubt a new formula would be implemented, all the low ranks ...

err I just realized I messed up the formulas a bit, the (loser's points)/(winner's points) is actually multiplied by 20, not just left as it is..so change my formula to
10+(10)(loser's points)/(winner's points), that makes more sense.

I think the best way to stop these extreme low or high point gains would be to change the point formula, but I'm sure that will never happen.

If it did though, I think this would be the best way to go:

Current formula: (loser's points)/(winner's points)
New formula: 10 + (.5)(loser's points ...

EDIT: nevermind, just forgot to install greasemonkey

Mentos- wrote:6 Player // Standard // Freestyle // Escalating // Chained // Fogless

1241199 - Classic -- 2 Opennings

Standard Password

does my link work?

6 Player // Standard // Freestyle // Escalating // Chained // Fogless

1241199 - Classic -- 2 Opennings

Standard Password

In that map if you control all castles you win the game. Sorry for not mentioning that in the original post hehe

But would you get everybodys points or would you get no points?

What happens in the Age of Might map when someone captures all the castles in a terminator game?