Seamus76 wrote:I like the new graphics a lot, nice work.
thank you
Seamus76 wrote:I still can't read the text very well though.
better?
Oneyed
Moderator: Cartographers
Seamus76 wrote:I like the new graphics a lot, nice work.
Seamus76 wrote:I still can't read the text very well though.
sannemanrobinson wrote:What do you mean with Attacks with conditional borders? If AEF only functions to fort between London and Bordeaux there is not much use in it.
AndyDufresne wrote:The upper left legend misspells 'capital' next to the auto-deploy.
Dukasaur wrote:I'm trying to figure out the bonus structure.
Does "bonus valid once" mean that you cannot have more than one bonus?
If I hold Italy and Ottoman, what do I get?
Oneyed wrote:Dukasaur wrote:I'm trying to figure out the bonus structure.
Does "bonus valid once" mean that you cannot have more than one bonus?
If I hold Italy and Ottoman, what do I get?
there are not written bonuses for states. my bad...
"bonus valid once" is for occupied regions, not for state bonuses. and it is valid for the states of the same power only.
so if you hold German Empire and A, B, C, D non CP regions you get +2 for occupied regions. when you also hold Ottoman Empire you do not get next +2 for A, B, C, D non CP regions.
could you help me witht text here to write this correctly but short?
then the list:Override bonus:
Hold one complete Major Power in either alliance (Central Powers or Entente) and get a bonus army for every two territories occupied inside an enemy power. You can collect only one override bonus.
Entente:UK
Central Powers:
France
Russia
ItalyGermany
Austria-Hungary
Ottoman
Bulgaria
Override bonus:
Hold one complete Central Power and get a bonus army for every two territories occupied inside an Entente power.
Override bonus:
Hold one complete Entente nation and get a bonus army for every two territories occupied inside a Central power.Entente:UK
Central Powers:
France
Russia
ItalyGermany
Austria-Hungary
Ottoman
Bulgaria
You can only hold one override bonus on each side.
Dukasaur wrote:I'm thinking something like:Override bonus:
Hold one complete Major Power in either alliance (Central Powers or Entente) and get a bonus army for every two territories occupied inside an enemy power. You can collect only one override bonus.
Dukasaur wrote:On a related note, I think Bulgaria may be too easy to hold. Might want to sacrifice historical accuracy for the sake of playability there and leave Bulgaria as a minor power only.
Dukasaur wrote:Then again Italy doesn't really belong with the Entente, either. It was original signatory to Central Powers pact. But all this can be discussed later.
Dukasaur wrote:Now, the above is okay if you can only hold one side or the other. But if it is possible to hold an override bonus on both sides, then we have to go something like this:
Override bonus:
Hold one complete Central Power and get a bonus army for every two territories occupied inside an Entente power.
Override bonus:
Hold one complete Entente nation and get a bonus army for every two territories occupied inside a Central power.
Dukasaur wrote:You can only hold one override bonus on each side.
iancanton wrote:i very much like the concept here of invasion routes thru the trenches only via the battlefields.
Oneyed wrote:iancanton wrote:i very much like the concept here of invasion routes thru the trenches only via the battlefields.
wait. with battlefield you mean current version with "only" opposite armies (without battlefields as regions) or this* old version with battlefields as regions?
iancanton wrote:the explanation of the conditional borders is not clear at all and u will need a different wording.
Oneyed wrote:thanks. yes the legend and wording is allways nightmare for me
Oneyed wrote:iancanton wrote:the map tries to cover too much territory, with the result that western and central europe, where the war was largely won and lost, looks tiny, while the ottoman empire has too many regions shown compared with its role in the war.
I know problem about Ottoman Empire. becasue the Ottoman Empire is easy to secure I add there more regions to gain this bonus harder. also this side of map is a little "closed" with a little maneuver possibilities. this needs to be solved...
Oneyed wrote:iancanton wrote:i recommend that u draw a line roughly from petrograd to alexandria and delete all regions that are east of this line.
but we "need" Caucasus because the connection between Russian Empire and Ottoman Empire here is the bigest problem...
Oneyed wrote:iancanton wrote:u're attempting to show the russian revolution too, which adds unnecessary complexity to the bonuses: the russian empire by itself is enough, while moscow, samara, the railway and the don cossacks participated in the russian revolution rather than the great war.
yes on one side you are right, but on the another side the revolution was part of these times and it adds realistic feature. maybe if we try more simple way how to add revolution there?
iancanton wrote:do u receive a +1 bonus for holding f2 and g3, but -2 if u have neither burgundy nor bavaria, making a total of -1?
iancanton wrote:can u give an example of how u want it to work?
iancanton wrote:we can solve the above situations by adding the russian black sea fleet and letting it one-way bombard constantinople.
iancanton wrote:the trouble is that the russian revolution removed russia from the war, so the two conflicts were only weakly linked.
iancanton wrote:there are inconsistencies caused by showing a railway only in russia but nowhere else and creating a russian empire bonus that is pointless because it can never be held except by holding the soviet bonus.
tkr4lf wrote:I don't really have any useful comments here, just wanted to drop in and say that the current version of the map looks amazing. Very nice artwork, Oneyed.
Oneyed wrote:iancanton wrote:do u receive a +1 bonus for holding f2 and g3, but -2 if u have neither burgundy nor bavaria, making a total of -1?
yes. my idea was that when you lost region in which is army located you can not supply army. but after your notice I see that this can not works this way...
so +2 for both opposite armies would be better?
Oneyed wrote:the conditional borders for one way moving troops from capital to town with the same flag is only as reinforce, not for attacks. therefore you must hold both (capital and town and also entire capitals state).
example: you hold Ottoman Empire (with Constantinople ofcourse) but you can not attack Alexandria from Constantinople. but when you take Alexandria from Egypt (and you still hold Ottoman Empire) you can reinforce troops from Constantinople to Alexandria.
Oneyed wrote:what about add to Black sea Russian ship which could bombards Angora, Constantinople and Ottoman ship. and add there also Ottoman ship which could bombard Ukraine, Russia and Russian ship.
to show later Ottoman weakness their ship could:
- lose any armies each round?
- or revets to neutral?
- or maybe can not bombard Russian ship?
Oneyed wrote:iancanton wrote:the trouble is that the russian revolution removed russia from the war, so the two conflicts were only weakly linked.
I can not agreed totaly here. the revolution was important event:
- Central powers moved all troops to western front
- Central powers gained all Ukraine, Batlic States, Belorusia
- Entete powers had new problem with support White Russians
so we could anyway shows revolution here.iancanton wrote:there are inconsistencies caused by showing a railway only in russia but nowhere else and creating a russian empire bonus that is pointless because it can never be held except by holding the soviet bonus.
to hold Russian Empire you do not need Samara and Moscow, so you can hold Russian Empire without Soviet Union.
Oneyed wrote:I strongly thought about more railways (Berlin-Wilhemshaven-Munich-Vienna-Budapest-Belgrade-Sofia). we could add any railways when central europe will be larger, I think.
Oneyed wrote:iancanton wrote:delete the sea route from marseille, so that france can attack italy only thru lombardy, which keeps more of the play in the middle of europe.
will be not Italy too closed? only Lombardy and Cyrenaica must be secured to hold Kingdom of Italy.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users