I'll be playing Assassin's Creed while I wait...

Moderator: Cartographers
AndyDufresne wrote:1) Simple
Classic
Africa
Ancient Greece
Arctic
Asia
Australia
Battle For Australia
Brazil
British Isles
Cairns Coral Coast
Canada
Caribbean Islands
Doodle Earth
France
Germany
Hong Kong
Iberia
Indochina
Ireland
Mongol Empire
Middle Earth
Middle East
North America
Portugal
Puget Sound
Scotland
South America
USA
U.S. Senate
2) Moderate
Alexander's Empire
American Civil War
BeNeLux
CCU
Chinese Checkers
Circus Maximus
Discworld
Europe
Extreme Global Warming
Great Lakes
Italy
Madness
Malta
Midkemdil
Montreal
Philippines
San Francisco
Tamriel
World 2.1
WWII Eastern Front
3) Complex
Bamboo Jack
Battle Of Actium
Berlin 1961
Crossword
Duck and Cover
D-Day: Omaha Beach!
Space
Siege!
USApocalypse
Valley Of The Kings
WWII Iwo Jima
WWII Western Front
8 Thoughts
4) Hardcore/Extreme
Age Of Merchants
Age of Realms: Magic
Age of Realms: Might
Conquer Man
Feudal Wars
King of the Mountains
Pearl Harbor
Rail USA
Solar System
==============
Something like that...maybe.
--Andy
You're too easily insulted lately and I'm not quite sure how to deal with it.cairnswk wrote:I actually am quite enraged and insulted that you might have a "Freaking Weird" category especially when most of my maps which i don't consider that hard appear to be in that category as derived by other persons. I prefer the term Hardcore/Extreme.
I will add your votes into the list I have and repost it. I think extreme is what we'll be going with. I thought Freaking Weird was funny and I couldn't think of anything else at the time. Hardcore could also inadvertently offend some pornophobe or something.rebelman wrote:i replied before i saw the request for no more lists but i think my list should be considered carefully as i have tried to reflect views i have heard expressed in live chat as well as my own experiences of playing all the maps.
PS Dim change that sig having read all 7 pages now im sick of the boobs on the cat already
i also prefer the phrase hardcore / extreme
Conflict Level Map Name S M C E
-------------- -------------------- ----- ----- ----- -----
3 Italy 6 7 0 0
i think M is the best choice here. it has the city bonuses and it has the dual language legend that could pose a problem for the idiots out there.
4 Mongol Empire 7 6 0 0
this one is an M because the different impassables that aren't explained anywhere and because of the trade route.(i previously explained the trade route confusion)
4 BeNeLux 6 7 0 0
an M for this one also. don't have any particular reason except the cities.
4 Philippines 6 7 0 0
the naval bases that attack eachother and offer bonuses are the reason i say this is an M.
4 American Civil War 0 7 6 0
also an M here. even if it would fit towards the upper section of M is still think it's not C material.
5 8 Thoughts 0 6 7 0
the dual continent terits and the unusual grouping of the bonuses makes me tend towards a C. it's not very complex but it can sure pop a lot of questions.
Confused Siege! 2 5 6 0
a 3-way split. but despite that i'm sure it's a C. one way attacks and the grouping of the bonuses make it very problematic for the noobs. especially the one way attacks. they are clear arrows and yet i've seen so many people asking about them. especially the tunnel 1way.
Confused Duck and Cover 1 6 6 0
here i'd go with C. towards the lower end of C but still. the bombardments still pose a lot of problems for new players. i don't know why. perhaps better instructions on the site should be done. and since this map has excessive bombardments i'd say C.
Confused King of the Mountain 0 6 5 2
i know i rated this extreme and to be honest i still stand by my decision despite being in the minority. this map has the kings the shapes the helipads the one way attacks, i've seen noobs that can't understand why kings can't attack other kings despite being clear in the legend. however since i'm in a minority here if the choice isn't to put it as E then at least put it as C. it is in no way just moderate. it's at least complex.
Coleman wrote:By the way, thanks for being a good sport about this so far. I know this isn't really something you're liking right now.
rebelman wrote:PS Dim change that sig having read all 7 pages now im sick of the boobs on the cat already
Coleman wrote:I'm all for just doing what DiM said (except for maybe some of the closer to call ones, we'll argue those a bit more). Let me show you how that would look in a little bit.
DiM wrote:Too Close
Bamboo Jack (Extreme)
King of the Mountains (Complex)
WWII Iwo Jima (Complex)
Coleman wrote:First off... I can't accept people thinking Bamboo Jack is extreme. It just doesn't feel right to me, at all. It has a lot of continents, fine, that's not an extreme characteristic. Some of the continents are really huge, still not an extreme characteristic. It has that odd building orientation... I'll sit on the fence with that one.
Coleman wrote:My Thoughts (mine in blue)
Alexander's Empire (Simple or Moderate)
Moderate: You can play on the water and it's dead space. If CCU is moderate (which we agreed it is apparently) then so is this.
agreed
American Civil War (Moderate or Complex)
Complex: There is too much going on for this to fit in with our other Moderate votes.
agreed
Bamboo Jack (Complex or Extreme)
Complex: Other then a lot of continents and the unusual building orientation there really isn't a lot going on. I hardly think you need BOB for this...
disagree i played this in fog of war and holy sh1t was it confusing and i love complex maps but this is the most extreme on cc so im saying extreme for this one its a head wrecker
BeNeLux (Simple or Moderate)
Simple: I'm surprised this was so close, what makes this Moderate?
agreed
Duck and Cover (Moderate or Complex)
Complex: Bombardments are going to throw a new user nearly every time. Unfortunately...
agreed
Europe (Simple or Moderate)
Simple: The one way paths are clearly explained right next to where they are, it's not confusing.
agreed
Italy (Simple or Moderate)
Simple: Seriously people....
agreed
King of the Mountains (Moderate or Complex)
Moderate: A lot of purists play or have played this and seem to not hate it. That would make me think there isn't anything too obtrusive about it.
i disagree here its definitely a complex map especially when you compare it to the others in the moderate category -
Mongol Empire (Simple or Moderate)
Simple: I'm again confused by the Moderate here, that trading route is just dotted lines connecting stuff, and it's the only weird thing on here, and it really isn't that weird.
disagree a bit like crossword in a way this map seems to be seen by players as more complicated than it actually is
Philippines (Simple or Moderate)
Moderate: This is just bias on my part, I find it a bit confusing and can't explain why.
agree
Rail USA (Complex or Extreme)
Complex: If you figure out the naming system it all falls into place. It's not as simple as moderate by any means, but extreme is a stretch.
disagree this should be extreme you need bob for this one and its not for the faint hearted
Siege! (Moderate or Complex)
Moderate: The one way routes are again, easily explained and drawn right where they happen. The split continents aren't that bad either, but this might be my bias again.
disagree maybe its the haunted ducks but this map is possessed by evil spirits so complex
USApocalypse (Moderate or Complex)
Complex: It's design and the weird logs it sends you confuse many a player.
agreed
WWII Iwo Jima (Moderate or Complex)
Moderate: I think simple, but that's not an option... I can tell you this map has no gimmicks. Yeah, that's right. No gimmicks as we defined them. So why is it complex?
agreed
WWII Western Front (Moderate or Complex)
Complex: If we think Eastern Front is Moderate... (We Do) Then it's only reasonable to say this is Complex.
agreed
8 Thoughts (Moderate or Complex)
No freaking clue. I'll side with Complex...
agreed
_________________Coleman
WWII Iwo Jima. I'll say this again, we came up with this huge list of non standard features. Iwo Jima doesn't have any of those. Not a one. I'm not even comfortable calling this Moderate, but I'm in the minority there. To say it is Complex seems outrageous to me. Is qwert so skilled that he can make nothing but Classic Features confusing?
Coleman wrote:I like that logic... You have swayed me.
Coleman wrote:Still disagree with these enough to want to fight about it:DiM wrote:Too Close
Bamboo Jack (Extreme)
King of the Mountains (Complex)
WWII Iwo Jima (Complex)
Coleman wrote:First off... I can't accept people thinking Bamboo Jack is extreme. It just doesn't feel right to me, at all. It has a lot of continents, fine, that's not an extreme characteristic. Some of the continents are really huge, still not an extreme characteristic. It has that odd building orientation... I'll sit on the fence with that one.
Other then those three things I don't know what else you can argue might be extreme, and since my opinion has two of those as complex, and fence sitting on the other, the complex side is heavier.
Coleman wrote:For King of the Mountains, I see so many people playing it multiple times that normally only play simple maps. To suddenly say it is Complex in the face of that also feels wrong to me. I think WidowMakers did a great job of giving something non-standard a simple interface that can make what would be complex features for someone else passably moderate in the eyes of the player.
Coleman wrote:WWII Iwo Jima. I'll say this again, we came up with this huge list of non standard features. Iwo Jima doesn't have any of those. Not a one. I'm not even comfortable calling this Moderate, but I'm in the minority there. To say it is Complex seems outrageous to me. Is qwert so skilled that he can make nothing but Classic Features confusing?
Coleman wrote:
So BeNeLux is now 2 v 1
Europe is now 2 v 1
King of the Mountains is now 2 v 2
WWII Iwo Jima is 2 v 1.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users