Ruben Cassar wrote:Is a small version of the maps available by any chance?
On a small map the army shadows are more cluttered and that might be a factor worth considering as well when deciding what are the right army shadow.
This is worth repeating.
Moderator: Cartographers
Ruben Cassar wrote:Is a small version of the maps available by any chance?
On a small map the army shadows are more cluttered and that might be a factor worth considering as well when deciding what are the right army shadow.
yeti_c wrote:I find it Ironic that White 60 (new classic) is beating Black 60 (old classic)...
Therefore any and all posts I made about the people who hated the new map being in the minority - were all fully justified... I will accept apologies now.
C.
wicked wrote:yeti_c wrote:I find it Ironic that White 60 (new classic) is beating Black 60 (old classic)...
Therefore any and all posts I made about the people who hated the new map being in the minority - were all fully justified... I will accept apologies now.
C.
you could only infer that if those were the only two choices.
joecoolfrog wrote:yeti_c wrote:I find it Ironic that White 60 (new classic) is beating Black 60 (old classic)...
Therefore any and all posts I made about the people who hated the new map being in the minority - were all fully justified... I will accept apologies now.
C.
In the last couple of days you have really come across as an arrogant arse, you certainly are not doing much for the reputation of the foundry. Lack can you please comment on the possibility of also retaining the old map, it would seemingly cut a lot of opposition at a stroke.
Etoh wrote:That's a good point: why is there not the option to keep the map the way it was?
yeti_c wrote:joecoolfrog wrote:yeti_c wrote:I find it Ironic that White 60 (new classic) is beating Black 60 (old classic)...
Therefore any and all posts I made about the people who hated the new map being in the minority - were all fully justified... I will accept apologies now.
C.
In the last couple of days you have really come across as an arrogant arse, you certainly are not doing much for the reputation of the foundry. Lack can you please comment on the possibility of also retaining the old map, it would seemingly cut a lot of opposition at a stroke.
The irony of course is that I don't make Maps... I just write XML for Mapmakers.
C.
sarascara wrote:It's called Classic for a reason. Keep it the way it was.
jiminski wrote:But 'No shadows' (surely that is the original map?) is beating the combined 50% + 60% White vote (i think the first Re-touch ended with 55.5% or something close so i added them together.)
Users browsing this forum: No registered users