Moderator: Community Team
chapcrap wrote:Tried to make a different post. Didn't work. I also made a new topic to see if that would work and a mod could move the post. Also didn't work, but it made a topic with no post in it... Idk guys
ZaBeast wrote:ZaBeast wrote:jfm10 wrote:My mail says i am fresh water but unless you are a sponge even the salt water one doesn't appear to be very dangerous.
Do any of you have their habitat stated in the role pm in one way or the other? Because I don't, and neither does the example role pmjfm10 wrote:For post above i was referring to the links provided at the time of the statement.Go back and read for yourself.
Except you specifically say your PM has that info
I am just asking a simple question to the rest of town, is it mentionned in anyone's role pm whether they are saltwater or freshwater?
BuJaber wrote:I do not think the approach of dakky and chap to paint certain things as scummy ever comes from town.
It sounds like they had a pre-planned agenda they are following.
Also I was hit with a post restriction which I believe came from scum. This might be egotistical but I think my posting in day 1 was contributing positively to the discussion, so for me to be silenced is an anti-town move. If I were suspected by a townie who thought I could be scum it doesn't make sense for them to silence me because that only makes it harder to sort me. Town would want me to talk more so they have more stuff to analyze.
This coupled with the fact that chapcrap is trying to paint the people not posting as scummy THIS EARLY in the day makes him incredibly suspicious.
Vote chapcrap
BuJaber wrote:Pikanchion wrote:BuJaber, are you able to say any more about the nature of your PR?
I was not allowed to post until a VC was posted that had at least 2 votes on a single wagon.
I was not told what the consequences of breaking said restriction would have been.
strike wolf wrote:Poisoner being town seems less likely to me than scum or third party. I'm pretty sure I've seen it happen in a non-wacky balanced game, it's just not super commo n as a town role. Honestly it's not super common period but has popped up more often as a secondary mafia kill or a variation of a Serial Killer. If town/third party, it doesn't really have a bearing on Blacky's alignment. If scum, it would be indicative of Blacky being town. We can't prove the alignment of the poisoner and 3rd party to me seems as likely as any other option, this would really only be a very slight town tell for Blacky. I also don't see much reason for Blacky to lie about being poisoned at the moment so I am going forth on the assumption he is telling the truth.
TX AG 90 wrote:Is it possible the poisoner has a passive ability. Maybe Blacky's night action triggered the passive effect.
Care to share Blacky?
Tobikera wrote:OK, OK.... I was going to wait until Monday when the full contingent is here, but you verbose types might add 15 more pages by then. Here's what I am (in part, not giving away everything) and what I know from my night action. I will probably need some protection tonight, although as stated earlier, my night actions can harm town as well as scum....
I am not a bus driver, or a water taxi driver, but I last night I could mis-direct someone's action. According to the mod, my abilities will be different on N2, but that's neither here nor there. My role is a TOWN role.
I am a squid and last night I squirted ink on a chosen person to mis-direct them.
I chose Metsfanmax.
I believe he is the poisoner. He was after someone else (no clue who), and my ink re-directed his action to blacky (who can still be scum, or can be town). I assume the action which was re-directed is targeted at a random player (in this case black). Could it be that the person actually targeted by Metsfanmax was told they were attacked, but weren't killed because of my action...don't know.
OK, that's what happened, believe it, or not. I am not going to reveal any more details of my role or future actions for obvious reasons.
If some sort of protector is out there, think of me tonight.
![]()
UNVOTE
VOTE METSFANMAX
Metsfanmax wrote:TX wrote:I still wonder if Blacky did something to trigger a poisoning. It would help if he shared his night action with us if it isn't too compromising.
What? No, stop fishing. Blacky's N1 action could not have influenced what someone else's N1 action was.
dakky21 wrote:You should all be aware this is probably a bastard setup as I know how Razorvich thinks and over complicating it is just going to steer away from real conversation. He also said this is his first attempt at hosing a mafia game so expect more shits to happen. It reminds me of my setups when I tried to host a game but said it's a bastard, and not much players joined. Here he offers credits and that's the incentive, but any tries to think logically (if I'm correct) are futile.
Metsfanmax wrote:Skoffin wrote: The point is that I was attacked by scum.
These types of statements are exactly why you deserve scrutiny. What you claim to know for sure is that you were attacked. The bit about the attack being by scum is speculation, not a fact, as you state here. And in that same post, you state that you suspect there's also an SK. So the statement-as-fact "I was attacked by scum" is suspicious.
BuJaber wrote:As far as I'm concerned there is definitely scum among those voting for jfm on day 1 and that's where I'd like to focus on. When we have enough info that we can actually piece together some of the night actions with a reasonable amount of confidence we can lynch based on that then.
Ragian wrote:@Pika, who would you vote now? I mean, if you had to...
chapcrap wrote:TX AG 90 wrote:Is it possible the poisoner has a passive ability. Maybe Blacky's night action triggered the passive effect.
Care to share Blacky?
Why are you asking blacky for claim information at this point? Scummy
UNVOTE
VOTE METSFANMAX
Metsfanmax wrote:TX wrote:I still wonder if Blacky did something to trigger a poisoning. It would help if he shared his night action with us if it isn't too compromising.
What? No, stop fishing. Blacky's N1 action could not have influenced what someone else's N1 action was.
blacky365 wrote:These are the facts;
1. I did not go for food, I played my night action
2. I did not get a response for my actual night action
3. The result I received was that I was poisoned
4. Going on the wording on the PM, it seems there is a healer/doctor role who can reverse the poison, thus saving me
IMO one of the following has occurred;
1. I was directly targeted by scum/3rd party
2. My night action triggered a defensive mechanism causing me to be poisoned
3. I was never the intended target but was poisoned due to redirection/bussing
chapcrap wrote:
aage and TX, why are you voting me? You don’t want to use information gathered from our failed lynch? You just want to go with your “gut”?
TX AG 90 wrote:chapcrap wrote:
aage and TX, why are you voting me? You don’t want to use information gathered from our failed lynch? You just want to go with your “gut”?
You were one of my leading candidates coming out of Day 1 and you have done nothing to convince me you are town.
However, there are several others I have put in the possible scum bucket with you. I'll unvote for now.
Unvote chapcrap
TX AG 90 wrote:At some point in the game, if we are 100% that Blacky is town (and we conclude the poisoner was passive), we may need him to tell us who he targeted N1 so the rest of us can avoid them.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
blacky365 wrote:TX AG 90 wrote:At some point in the game, if we are 100% that Blacky is town (and we conclude the poisoner was passive), we may need him to tell us who he targeted N1 so the rest of us can avoid them.
I want to say who I targeted last night, but do not want to give that individual the time to prepare a defense story.
I am waiting to see if they reveal anything so I can trap them in a lie...
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
blacky365 wrote:TX AG 90 wrote:At some point in the game, if we are 100% that Blacky is town (and we conclude the poisoner was passive), we may need him to tell us who he targeted N1 so the rest of us can avoid them.
I want to say who I targeted last night, but do not want to give that individual the time to prepare a defense story.
I am waiting to see if they reveal anything so I can trap them in a lie...
Pikanchion wrote:blacky365 wrote:TX AG 90 wrote:At some point in the game, if we are 100% that Blacky is town (and we conclude the poisoner was passive), we may need him to tell us who he targeted N1 so the rest of us can avoid them.
I want to say who I targeted last night, but do not want to give that individual the time to prepare a defense story.
I am waiting to see if they reveal anything so I can trap them in a lie...
Unless you actually have something relatively concrete please don't claim based on passive-poisoner speculation and rolefishing by TX AG 90, speaking of, @Ragian TX AG 90 has certainly jumped up my list of lynch candidates for today.
— FP'd by strike wolf —
Well, that certainly changes things... I don't have time right now, so I'll come back to that later.
TX AG 90 wrote:Question for the group.
Are scum allowed to communicate with each other outside of voting on a night target? Or do they have to communicate openly on this board?
In other words, if Scum A used an ability to find out what Townie B's abilities are, could they message the rest of their scum buddy's?
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users