And you just admitted you have no clue on how to find the Thing D3 :
"and when did I said we are gonna find the Thing D3?"
Not a clue big enough to justify no vig tonight that is
Moderator: Community Team
"and when did I said we are gonna find the Thing D3?"
Votanic wrote:I don't agree with Traf either on this. I don't see any reason to adamantly push for a 'no vig'.
Vigging tonight might very well be a great idea... but of course that depends on who gets vigged, doesn't it?
I get that finding the recruiter would be better than finding the recruited... though finding any scum with more certainty, is better than acting on no real evidence.
In any case, it doesn't help for players who aren't actually proven town to keep adding themselves to the proven town list. So far strike, Trav, and Charle have all glibly announced they are above suspicion. Actually, it doesn't work that way...
Traf's no vig campaign does make him seem scummier... maybe...
.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Ragian wrote:To be honest, I feel like Traf's latest posts ring town. For me, it's between Charle, EW, Swang, and Votanic (in alphabetical order). I'll cast a vote later today.
Ragian wrote:To be honest, I feel like Traf's latest posts ring town. For me, it's between Charle, EW, Swang, and Votanic (in alphabetical order). I'll cast a vote later today.
Ragian wrote:Look, Sonic... I'm well aware of your view on Traf this game. I think that even the zeroes and ones of the CC platform know your standpoint. However, it's problematic that you storm in like a drunk uncle at a wedding every time that Traf says anything. To me, it obscures the game. Let's say that you're right about Traf. The tenacity and persistence of your attack on him blur that point. It ends up coming across as a schoolyard argument. You're making it hard to concentrate, mate.
I'm going back to see who snug in on the BT today to see if something stands out apart from what I already think is awful gameplay.
Ragian wrote:Swang initiated the BT on me when the discussion was going stale. Charle was incredibly quick to get in on the action. It gets more interesting when EW limps in despitessaying that he doesn't think I'm The Thing. Votanic limps in shortly after. Both, I believe, while I'm away. Sonic then drops the hammer. All of them wasting a BT.
Swang is too aggressive to how I would play it. I'm discounting him right now. For the moment, I'm ignoringaanyone not in on the BT.
I'll take cases for Charle, EW, and Sonic under consideration if you would, please. I need other people's eyes on this.
I'm discounting Votanic because I'm the only one thinking he's counterproductive to an extent where it hurts town.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Ragian wrote:Swang initiated the BT on me when the discussion was going stale. Charle was incredibly quick to get in on the action. It gets more interesting when EW limps in despitessaying that he doesn't think I'm The Thing. Votanic limps in shortly after. Both, I believe, while I'm away. Sonic then drops the hammer. All of them wasting a BT.
Swang is too aggressive to how I would play it. I'm discounting him right now. For the moment, I'm ignoringaanyone not in on the BT.
I'll take cases for Charle, EW, and Sonic under consideration if you would, please. I need other people's eyes on this.
I'm discounting Votanic because I'm the only one thinking he's counterproductive to an extent where it hurts town.
Ragian wrote:I wanted to BT you, but when people went for me, I wanted a lynch in return. Didn't get it. Won't get it. I have moved on despite finding your play scummy in a non-committal way.
I realise that you have a hard time looking beyond your own nose, but I'm asking for cases on the ones mentioned. The only thing you're doing is trying to justify your own actions in a "he started it" fashion. Could you play ball, or are you going to stay in that corner?
Votanic wrote:Ragian wrote:I wanted to BT you, but when people went for me, I wanted a lynch in return. Didn't get it. Won't get it. I have moved on despite finding your play scummy in a non-committal way.
I realise that you have a hard time looking beyond your own nose, but I'm asking for cases on the ones mentioned. The only thing you're doing is trying to justify your own actions in a "he started it" fashion. Could you play ball, or are you going to stay in that corner?
I have already given multiple insightful, read lists. Not incomplete, but targeted (and largely evidence-free) finger-points like some players, but analytical reads.
I will do so go again now. (Indeed, I out-did myself this time, I can only hope everybody appreciates this... )
Btw, I wish there was a 'draw' feature on the forums. I know it would soon get over-used and abused, but it would also be really helpful for whipping up x-y graphs and Venn diagrams.
= good townie or good at faking it...
= Confirmed Townie (with issues...)
= popular scum candidate, but it ain't necessarily so...
quiet type...
LOUD type
1. Pixar N1 Killed - Clark Vanilla![]()
2. Extreme- He posts regularly, and gives analyses, none are particularly hostile, or memorable. After trying to process the drama of Sonic, Traf, and ragian posts, I kind-of shrug at EWs... Hmm, maybe that is the reaction he wants?
3. TrafCircumstances have made him a perennial suspect... and the strain has turned him into the anti-Sonic. Players (who act) wiser than me, often point fingers at him. They might be right! I said I might vote for him myself, and I mean it... but then again, the guy driving his bandwagon is Sonic (and formerly Ragian).
4. Dega![]()
, formerly
Fairly quiet, His former BT remains a talking point. He also got sick of Sonic's antics, but was also fine with lynching traf which does come off as level-headed and reasonable to me... but he could be stealthy recruited scum. That possibility exists.
5. RagianTown, Not recruiter... I'm not trying to feud with him, but in truth his randomish and changeable lists of good guys and bad guys aren't really extra insightful, just because he passed his BT.
6. Charle![]()
That post where he struck out on his own and said damn it all, lynch Traf! was refreshingly outspoken... and possibly scummy. See, see what happens when you say anything bold and assertive around here. Easy-going townie or stealthy scum. That is for each of us to decide...
7. Swang![]()
![]()
Very quiet. Pixar posts more and he's dead (that was a joke). His last two very short posts were five pages ago. He said no to BTing Sonic, but yes to vigging him (
) He was also fine with lynching Traf or strike, hmm? His detachment means... scummy...? RL issues...? just 'over' this kooky game...? idk.
8. Sonic![]()
And again..., is he scum or does he just act that way? My vote is still on Sonic because he still seems like the closest thing to an evidence-based guess, but I don't know for sure. Slowly, we all are getting used to his 'style'... The irony is that he is now becoming more likely to be ignored than lynched. Perhaps that is just desserts for a bad townie, but it is also a face-palming victory for the wiliest of scum.
9. StrikeLast read, I joked he was the unofficial mayor of town, but lately he to has been getting some flack too. Does this come from scummy (or misguided) attempts to push a perfect townie off his pedestal....or from the RL understanding that the worst vices will purposely hide behind the most virtuous facades. I mean in actuality, his reads aren't any more evidence-backed or consistent than anyone else's, are they? Is he Tom Hanks... or Bill Cosby??
10. Votan In truth, I am, but probably perceived as some mix of
![]()
and
Yes, I can engage in repeated, circular arguments based on mere conjecture and politics. I try to make it fun and interesting, but I don't really enjoy it. I want evidence, which usually only comes about when somebody is killed... or temporarily when they are blood-tested.
I know very little for certain, but if another bandwagon/randwagon rolls around, I just might jump on it, mostly out of sheer bored desperation at this point. I'm ready for this long day to be over.. .
Votanic wrote:I have already given multiple insightful, read lists. Not incomplete, but targeted (and largely evidence-free) finger-points like some players, but analytical reads.
Ragian wrote:Votanic wrote:I have already given multiple insightful, read lists. Not incomplete, but targeted (and largely evidence-free) finger-points like some players, but analytical reads.
![]()
![]()
Ragian wrote:I just love it that he is allowed to inflate to a point where hyperbole isn't even fitting. Contrast that with him taking offence the minute anyone claims that they're town.
Vote Strike
He says all the right things, he wants to structure D3 to an extent where he can get two townies for the price of one, and he has been careful with his voting. He seems to play this exactly like I would if I were The Thing.
Sorry m8 but you have not been "Sonic Pondering " over this."I've pondered over this and was hoping to see more people jump on responses."
gives me a bad vibeEasiest case for me is that I didnt hammer Traf when I could, and was the first to actually state that I think he's town.
SoN!c wrote:I agree but im gonna keep my word voting whatever Ragian decides.Sorry m8 but you have not been "Sonic Pondering " over this."I've pondered over this and was hoping to see more people jump on responses."![]()
You pondered too little, i've pondered too much. It is what it is. Thats life.
Lesson learned
Also, your on my 2nd position "recruited list"
Sogives me a bad vibeEasiest case for me is that I didnt hammer Traf when I could, and was the first to actually state that I think he's town.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users